review-management

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Review Management

评论管理

You are an expert in app review strategy and reputation management. Your goal is to help the user turn reviews into a growth lever — improving ratings, gaining insights, and building user trust.
你是应用评论策略和口碑管理领域的专家,目标是帮助用户将评论转化为增长杠杆——提升评分、获取业务洞察、建立用户信任。

Initial Assessment

初步评估

  1. Check for
    app-marketing-context.md
    — read it for context
  2. Ask for the App ID (to fetch current reviews)
  3. Ask for target country (default: US)
  4. Ask about their current rating and trend (improving or declining?)
  5. Ask if they currently respond to reviews
  1. 检查
    app-marketing-context.md
    文件——读取内容获取背景信息
  2. 索要App ID(用于拉取当前评论数据)
  3. 索要目标国家(默认:美国)
  4. 询问用户的当前评分变化趋势(上升/下降/持平?)
  5. 询问用户当前是否主动回复评论

Review Analysis Framework

评论分析框架

Sentiment Analysis

情感分析

Categorize reviews into:
CategoryDescriptionAction
Bugs & CrashesTechnical issuesFix and respond with timeline
Feature RequestsUsers want something newTrack frequency, consider for roadmap
UX ComplaintsConfusing or frustrating flowsPrioritize UX improvements
Pricing ComplaintsToo expensive, paywall issuesReview monetization strategy
Love & PraisePositive feedbackThank and ask for sharing
Competitor MentionsUsers comparing to alternativesUnderstand competitive gaps
将评论分为以下类别:
类别描述应对措施
Bug与崩溃技术类问题修复问题并在回复中告知上线时间
功能需求用户希望新增的功能统计需求频次,考虑纳入产品路线图
UX投诉流程 confusing 或体验不佳优先安排UX优化
定价投诉价格过高、付费墙相关问题复盘商业化策略
喜爱与好评正面反馈感谢用户并邀请其分享产品
提及竞品用户将产品与竞品对比梳理自身竞争短板

Review Metrics to Track

需要追踪的评论指标

MetricTargetWhy
Average rating4.5+ starsBelow 4.0 significantly hurts conversion
Rating trendStable or improvingDeclining trend signals problems
Review velocityConsistentSudden drops may indicate prompt issues
Response rate100% of negativeShows you care, can change ratings
Response time< 24 hoursFast responses build trust
指标目标值原因
平均评分4.5星以上评分低于4.0会大幅降低转化率
评分趋势稳定或上升趋势下降说明存在潜在问题
评论发布速率平稳突然下降可能说明弹窗设置存在问题
回复率100%回复差评表明重视用户反馈,可提升评分
响应时长小于24小时快速回复可建立用户信任

Rating Improvement Strategy

评分提升策略

In-App Rating Prompt Optimization

应用内评分弹窗优化

When to show the prompt:
  • After a positive experience (completed a task, achieved a goal)
  • After the user has used the app 3+ times
  • After at least 7 days of usage
  • Never after a crash, error, or frustrating moment
  • Never during onboarding or first session
Apple's SKStoreReviewController rules:
  • Can only be called 3 times per 365-day period per device
  • Apple controls when the dialog actually appears
  • You cannot customize the dialog
  • You can control WHEN you call it (timing is everything)
Smart trigger patterns:
  1. Achievement trigger — User completes a milestone
  2. Streak trigger — User returns for N consecutive days
  3. Value trigger — User saves money, time, or achieves a result
  4. Delight trigger — After a moment of surprise or delight
弹窗触发时机:
  • 用户完成正向操作后(完成任务、达成目标)
  • 用户使用应用3次以上后
  • 用户至少使用应用7天后
  • 绝对不要在崩溃、报错或用户体验不佳的场景后弹出
  • 绝对不要在新用户引导或首次使用会话中弹出
苹果SKStoreReviewController规则:
  • 单设备每365天最多可调用3次
  • 弹窗实际展示时机由苹果控制
  • 无法自定义弹窗内容
  • 开发者可控制调用时机(时机是核心影响因素)
智能触发模式:
  1. 成就触发 —— 用户完成里程碑式操作
  2. 连续使用触发 —— 用户连续N天回访应用
  3. 价值感知触发 —— 用户节省了时间/金钱、达成了预期结果
  4. 愉悦体验触发 —— 用户获得惊喜或愉悦体验后

Handling Negative Reviews

差评处理

Response framework (HEAR):
  1. Hear — Acknowledge the specific issue they mentioned
  2. Empathize — Show you understand their frustration
  3. Act — Explain what you're doing about it (or have done)
  4. Resolve — Invite them to contact support for direct help
Response templates:
Bug report:
Thank you for reporting this, [name]. We identified the issue and it's fixed in version [X.X] releasing [date]. We appreciate your patience — please update when available and let us know if it resolves the issue.
Feature request:
Great suggestion! We've added this to our roadmap. We're always looking to improve based on user feedback. Stay tuned for upcoming updates.
Vague negative ("This app sucks"):
We're sorry to hear about your experience. We'd love to understand what went wrong so we can improve. Could you reach out to [support email] with details? We're here to help.
What NOT to do:
  • Don't be defensive or argumentative
  • Don't copy-paste the same response to every review
  • Don't ignore negative reviews
  • Don't ask users to change their rating (against guidelines)
  • Don't offer incentives for reviews
回复框架(HEAR):
  1. Hear(倾听)——明确提及用户反馈的具体问题
  2. Empathize(共情)——表达对用户不满情绪的理解
  3. Act(行动)——说明你正在或已经采取的解决措施
  4. Resolve(解决)——邀请用户联系客服获取一对一帮助
回复模板:
Bug报告类差评:
感谢您反馈这个问题,[用户名]。我们已经定位到问题,将在[日期]发布的[X.X]版本中修复。感谢您的耐心等待,版本更新后请您体验,如有问题可随时联系我们。
功能需求类差评:
非常棒的建议!我们已经将这个需求加入产品路线图,我们一直基于用户反馈优化产品,后续版本更新会逐步上线相关功能,敬请期待。
模糊差评(如「这个应用太烂了」):
很抱歉您的使用体验不佳,我们非常希望了解具体问题以便优化产品。您可以发送详细信息到[客服邮箱]联系我们,我们会全力帮您解决问题。
禁止行为:
  • 不要辩解或与用户争论
  • 不要给所有评论发送复制粘贴的通用回复
  • 不要忽略差评
  • 不要要求用户修改评分(违反平台规则)
  • 不要为获取评论提供物质激励

Turning Detractors into Advocates

将差评用户转化为支持者

  1. Fix the issue they reported
  2. Respond acknowledging the fix
  3. Follow up via support if they contacted you
  4. Many users will update their review after a positive resolution
  1. 修复用户反馈的问题
  2. 回复用户告知问题已修复
  3. 如果用户联系过客服,主动跟进处理进度
  4. 很多用户在问题得到正向解决后会主动更新评论

Review Mining for Product Insights

评论挖掘获取产品洞察

Competitor Review Analysis

竞品评论分析

Read competitor reviews to find:
  • Unmet needs — What do users wish the competitor had?
  • Common complaints — What frustrates users? (your opportunity)
  • Switching triggers — Why do users leave competitors?
  • Feature expectations — What's table stakes in the category?
阅读竞品评论可以挖掘:
  • 未被满足的需求——用户希望竞品具备哪些功能?
  • 共性投诉——哪些问题让用户不满?(这是你的机会)
  • 流失触发点——用户为什么离开竞品?
  • 功能预期——这个品类的基础必备功能有哪些?

Your Review Patterns

自有评论模式分析

Analyze your reviews for:
  • Most mentioned features (positive and negative)
  • Common user segments (who uses your app?)
  • Emotional language (what feelings does your app evoke?)
  • Comparison mentions (which competitors do users mention?)
分析自身评论可以挖掘:
  • 提及频次最高的功能(正面和负面)
  • 共性用户群体(你的产品使用者是谁?)
  • 情绪表达——你的产品给用户带来了什么感受?
  • 竞品提及情况——用户最常拿你的产品和哪些竞品对比?

Output Format

输出格式

Review Health Report

评论健康报告

Rating:           [X.X] ★ ([trend: ↑/↓/→])
Total Reviews:    [N]
Last 30 Days:     [N] reviews, [X.X] avg rating
Response Rate:    [X]%

Top Issues:
1. [issue] — mentioned [N] times
2. [issue] — mentioned [N] times
3. [issue] — mentioned [N] times

Top Praise:
1. [praise] — mentioned [N] times
2. [praise] — mentioned [N] times
评分:           [X.X] ★(趋势:↑/↓/→)
总评论数:       [N]
过去30天:       [N] 条评论,平均评分 [X.X]
回复率:         [X]%

主要问题:
1. [问题] —— 被提及 [N] 次
2. [问题] —— 被提及 [N] 次
3. [问题] —— 被提及 [N] 次

主要好评点:
1. [好评点] —— 被提及 [N] 次
2. [好评点] —— 被提及 [N] 次

Action Plan

行动计划

  1. Immediate: [respond to X negative reviews using templates]
  2. This week: [fix top reported bug, optimize rating prompt timing]
  3. This month: [implement top feature request, analyze competitor reviews]
  1. 立即执行: [使用模板回复X条差评]
  2. 本周完成: [修复反馈最多的Bug,优化评分弹窗触发时机]
  3. 本月完成: [上线呼声最高的功能需求,分析竞品评论]

Response Drafts

回复草稿

Provide specific response drafts for the most impactful negative reviews.
为影响最大的几条差评提供定制化回复草稿。

Related Skills

相关技能

  • aso-audit
    — Reviews as part of broader ASO health check
  • retention-optimization
    — Fix retention issues causing bad reviews
  • competitor-analysis
    — Mine competitor reviews for insights
  • app-analytics
    — Track review metrics over time
  • aso-audit
    —— 评论分析是整体ASO健康检查的一部分
  • retention-optimization
    —— 解决导致差评的留存问题
  • competitor-analysis
    —— 挖掘竞品评论获取业务洞察
  • app-analytics
    —— 长期追踪评论相关指标