<!-- Copyright Elasticsearch B.V. and/or licensed to Elasticsearch B.V. under one
or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
this work for additional information regarding copyright
ownership. Elasticsearch B.V. licenses this file to you under
the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
software distributed under the License is distributed on an
"AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
specific language governing permissions and limitations
under the License. -->
Check Kibana OAS
You are reviewing a Kibana PR from
against the
Elastic API docs checklist,
core guidelines, and
Kibana quickstart. Output a concrete action list. Every item names the file and line to change.
Input
is a PR number or URL. Extract the PR number. Examples:
/docs-check-kibana-oas 289719
/docs-check-kibana-oas https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/289719
/docs-check-kibana-oas https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/289719/changes
If no PR number is given, ask for one.
Key principle: YAML is generated, TypeScript is the source of truth
The files under
(
,
) are auto-generated from TypeScript route definitions. CI regenerates them on push. Use the YAML diff to detect problems (missing
, wrong stability label, empty values), but every action you output must point at the TypeScript source that generates it. Never suggest manually editing the YAML.
Workflow
1. Fetch the PR
bash
gh pr diff <PR_NUMBER> --repo elastic/kibana
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --repo elastic/kibana --json title,body,files,headRefName
Save the full diff. You will scan it multiple times.
2. Check out the PR branch
Find a local Kibana clone. Check, in order:
- Current working directory (if it is inside a repo)
Then check out the PR branch:
bash
cd <KIBANA_DIR> && gh pr checkout <PR_NUMBER>
If no local clone is found at either location, tell the user and ask them for the path to their Kibana checkout.
Read the actual source files from this checkout for exact line numbers. Never compute line numbers from diff hunk headers.
3. Classify the changes
From the diff, sort changed files into:
- Route definitions: files under registering endpoints
- Schema definitions: files with / / etc. used in route validation
- Generated YAML: — scan for diagnostic signals only
- Example files: YAML under
- Other: types, tests, mocks — note but do not audit
4. Audit
Apply every rule from the rules section below against the diff. Use the generated YAML as a cross-check signal. If the YAML looks wrong (missing
, empty
, wrong label), trace it back to the TypeScript source to find the root cause.
For every finding, read the actual file from the checked-out branch to confirm the exact line number. Point at the line where the developer needs to make the change.
5. Cross-check sibling routes
When the PR adds a new route to an existing resource, read the existing routes from the checked-out branch to compare conventions. Look for patterns like narrative doc links, tag usage, or example files that siblings use but the new route does not.
6. Output
Print a flat action list, then a summary. Be terse. No diagnosis essays.
Linking to files
Every file reference must be a clickable markdown link into the PR's "Files changed" view:
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/<PR_NUMBER>/files#diff-<SHA256_OF_PATH>
Compute the anchor:
bash
echo -n "<full-repo-relative-path>" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-64
Link like:
[agents.ts:689](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/290353/files#diff-<hash>)
If you cannot compute the hash, link to the PR files page with the bare path.
Format
## OAS review — PR #<NUMBER>
**<PR title>**
### Actions
1. ❌ **Add `stability` to availability** — [agents.ts:689](<link>)
`availability: { since: '9.5.0' }` → `availability: { stability: 'experimental', since: '9.5.0' }`
2. ❌ **Add description for `user_id` path param** — [agents.ts:140](<link>)
Path parameters must have `meta: { description: '...' }`.
3. ❌ **Add narrative doc link** — [attachments.ts:105](<link>)
Sibling conversation routes link to the agent chat docs. Consider adding a similar link.
4. ❌ **Summary exceeds 45 characters** — [agents.ts:684](<link>)
`'Get all agent builder conversation attachments for a user'` → shorten to ~40 chars.
### Passes
- ✅ `summary` and `description` present — [agents.ts:684](<link>)
- ✅ Path params have `meta.description` — [agents.ts:700](<link>)
- ✅ Tags include `oas-tag` — [agents.ts:680](<link>)
- ✅ Example file referenced — [agents_get.yaml](<link>)
### Verdict
**N actions** (X required, Y suggested)
Rules:
- ❌ for actions the author needs to address
- ✅ for passes — list briefly, one line each
- Tag pre-existing issues as "(pre-existing)" so the PR author knows what they introduced vs. inherited
- Always include the before → after when the fix is a one-liner
- Every file reference is a markdown link to the PR files view
Rules
These rules come from the
Elastic API docs checklist, the
core guidelines, the
organize and annotate guide, and the
Kibana quickstart. They also incorporate conventions observed across existing Kibana routes.
1. Route-level availability (lifecycle status)
Every new route MUST have
in its
block with both
and
. This powers the version badges and tech preview labels in the published API docs.
Valid
values and their rendered labels:
| Value | Rendered label | Meaning |
|---|
| Experimental | Can change or be removed in future versions |
| Technical preview | Pre-release, may change |
| Generally available | Stable for production use (default if omitted, but be explicit) |
is a version string like
. It marks the version when the API first shipped. It appears in Elastic Stack docs and is omitted from serverless docs.
Correct pattern:
typescript
router.versioned.get({
path: '...',
options: {
tags: ['...', 'oas-tag:Agent builder'],
availability: {
stability: 'experimental',
since: '9.6.0',
},
},
})
What to flag:
- ❌ block missing entirely
- ❌ missing from
- ❌ missing from
- ❌ has an invalid value
2. Route summary
Every new route MUST have a
. Summaries appear in IDEs, search results, and documentation overviews.
Summary guidelines:
- 5–45 characters — keep it short because space is limited in many contexts
- Start with a verb — "Get", "Create", "Update", "Delete"
- Use basic verbs — "Get" not "Retrieve", "Update" not "Modify"
- Include articles — "Delete a space", "Delete spaces"
- Sentence case — capitalize only the first word and proper nouns
- No trailing period
What to flag:
- ❌ missing
- ❌ Summary exceeds 45 characters
- ❌ Summary does not start with a verb
- ❌ Summary uses title case or ends with a period
3. Route description
Every new route MUST have a
. Descriptions support markdown formatting and should cover:
- Purpose and impact: what does this operation do and why would a user need it?
- Prerequisites or context: what should users know before calling this endpoint?
- Constraints: valid values, formats, size limits, rate limits
- Relationships: how parameters interact, how multiple values are handled
A good description adds detail beyond the summary. A bad description just restates it.
Good:
'Create a new conversation with an agent. The conversation persists across sessions and can be shared with other users via access control. To learn more, refer to the [agent chat documentation](https://www.elastic.co/docs/...).'
Bad:
'Creates a conversation.'
(restates the summary, adds nothing)
What to flag:
- ❌ missing
- ❌ Description is just a copy or restatement of the summary
- ❌ Description omits constraints or prerequisites that a user would need
4. Narrative documentation link
Route descriptions should include a trailing sentence linking to the relevant narrative docs page. This is a convention observed across existing Kibana routes. It is most important when sibling routes on the same resource already include such a link.
Pattern:
typescript
description:
'List all conversations. To learn more, refer to the [agent chat documentation](https://www.elastic.co/docs/...).',
How to check: compare against sibling routes. If other routes on the same resource include a "To learn more..." or "refer to the docs" link and the new route does not, flag it.
What to flag:
- ❌ Missing narrative doc link when siblings include one (warning, not error — the link might not exist yet for a brand-new feature)
5. Tags
Routes MUST have at least one
entry in their
array. Tags group APIs by feature in the published docs.
Tag guidelines:
- Use sentence case: not
- Use consistent tag names across related routes
- One per route for clean navigation
What to flag:
- ❌ No in the tags array
- ❌ Tag name uses inconsistent casing vs. sibling routes
- ❌ Multiple entries on a single route
6. Path parameter descriptions
Every path parameter MUST have
meta: { description: '...' }
in its schema definition.
Correct pattern:
typescript
params: schema.object({
conversation_id: schema.string({
meta: { description: 'The unique identifier of the conversation.' },
}),
}),
What to flag:
- ❌ A path parameter has no or no inside
7. Property descriptions
Every new request body, query, or response property MUST have
meta: { description: '...' }
.
A good property description explains what the value controls, its format, and any constraints:
- ❌ — vague, no constraints, no default
- ✅
'The maximum number of results to return. Must be between 1 and 1000. Defaults to 20.'
What to flag:
- ❌ New property has no at all
- ❌ exists but has no
- ❌ Description is a single generic phrase that restates the property name (for example, on a property called )
8. Enum value descriptions
When a property uses
or
to define a fixed set of values, each value should be described, either in the property description or in the individual schema options.
Skip documenting values that are self-explanatory:
- / , / , / — obvious from the name
- / / — not obvious; what does grant beyond ?
- / / — not obvious; what concretely changes at each level?
What to flag:
- ❌ Enum values with no descriptions when the meaning or behavioral difference is unclear from the name
9. Default values
Optional parameters and properties should document their defaults. In Kibana route schemas, this means using
schema.maybe(schema.string({ defaultValue: '...' }))
or documenting the server-side default in the description.
Correct pattern:
typescript
page_size: schema.maybe(
schema.number({
defaultValue: 20,
meta: { description: 'Number of results per page. Defaults to 20.' },
})
),
When the default is set server-side (not in the schema), document it in the description instead:
'Sort order. The server defaults to descending if not specified.'
How to check: compare against sibling routes on the same resource. If a sibling documents its
default but the new route does not, flag it.
What to flag:
- ❌ Optional parameter with an undocumented default when the behavior changes based on the value
10. Property-level availability
When a new property is added to an existing route's schema, and that property ships in a later version than the route itself, the property MUST have its own
with
and
.
How to detect: look for added
or
fields inside an existing route's validation block. If the route has
and the new property ships in
, the property needs its own availability.
Correct pattern:
typescript
new_field: schema.maybe(
schema.string({
meta: {
availability: { stability: 'experimental', since: '9.6.0' },
description: 'Description of the new field.',
},
})
),
What to flag:
- ❌ New property on an older route has no
- ❌ Property has but is missing or
11. Deprecation
Deprecated routes or properties should be marked. In Kibana, the route's
supports a
flag, and property descriptions should explain the deprecation.
What to flag:
- ❌ A property or route is described as deprecated in comments or description text but has no marker
- ❌ Deprecated property has no description explaining what to use instead
12. Response examples
New routes SHOULD have an example file referenced via
. Examples significantly improve API documentation usability.
Inline TypeScript examples (type-checked at dev time):
typescript
.addVersion({
version: '2023-10-31',
options: {
oasOperationObject: () => ({
requestBody: {
content: {
'application/json': {
examples: {
example1: {
summary: 'An example request',
value: { name: 'Example' } as MyType,
},
},
},
},
},
}),
},
})
YAML file examples:
typescript
import path from 'node:path';
.addVersion({
version: '2023-10-31',
options: {
oasOperationObject: () => path.join(__dirname, 'examples/my_route.yaml'),
},
})
Example YAML structure (in
):
yaml
requestBody:
content:
application/json:
examples:
example1:
summary: Example request
description: An example of creating a resource
value:
name: 'Example'
responses:
200:
content:
application/json:
examples:
success:
summary: Successful response
value:
id: '12345'
name: 'Example'
Example guidelines:
- Use realistic data, not placeholders
- Write clear summaries (under 45 characters) for each example
- Include at least one success response example (HTTP 200)
- Consider adding for cURL and Console examples
What to flag:
- ❌ No reference (warning — strongly recommended)
- ❌ Example file contains placeholder or empty values
- ❌ No response example for the success case
13. Operation ID (advisory only — do not include in the Actions list)
Public routes can optionally set an explicit
. SDK and CLI generators use this ID as the method/command name; if omitted, the generator derives one from the method and path (for example,
), which is often unclear.
Correct pattern:
typescript
router.versioned.post({
path: '/api/foo',
access: 'public',
summary: 'Create a foo resource',
operationId: 'create-foo',
options: { ... },
});
Guidelines:
- Use kebab-case names, for example , , .
- Keep operation IDs stable across versions of the same route — don't rename gratuitously.
This is a suggestion, not a compliance rule — do not add it to the ❌ Actions list or count it against the verdict. Only raise it as a one-line side note ("Consider adding an explicit
") when the user specifically asks about SDK/CLI generation, operation IDs, or when a route in the diff already sets one inconsistently with the kebab-case
convention.
14. Cross-check: generated YAML as a diagnostic signal
The YAML files under
are auto-generated. Never suggest editing the YAML directly. Every fix goes in the TypeScript source.
Use the YAML
values to detect problems:
| YAML | TypeScript meaning |
|---|
Experimental; added in 9.6.0
| availability: { stability: 'experimental', since: '9.6.0' }
|
Technical Preview; added in 9.2.0
| availability: { stability: 'tech_preview', since: '9.2.0' }
|
| (no label) | availability: { stability: 'stable', since: '9.0.0' }
|
| (no version) | Normal for — serverless omits |
| (empty string) | Missing in the TypeScript |
| Missing entirely | Missing block in the TypeScript |
What to flag (always pointing at the TypeScript file):
- ❌ Empty or missing → trace to the TS route and flag missing or
- ❌ YAML label does not match TS stability → flag the TS mismatch
- The serverless YAML omitting is expected, not a finding