Loading...
Loading...
Compare original and translation side by side
CRITICAL: Do NOT usetool — it blocks Write/Edit/Task tools. Follow the workflow below.EnterPlanMode
重要提示: 请勿使用工具——它会阻止Write/Edit/Task工具。请遵循以下工作流程。EnterPlanMode
$ARGUMENTS## Plan Context/plan$ARGUMENTS## Plan Context/plan| Category | Check |
|---|---|
| Structure | Has plan.md with YAML frontmatter (title, status, effort)? |
| Structure | Phases numbered and linked correctly? |
| Logic | Dependencies between phases mapped? |
| Logic | Risk assessment present with mitigations? |
| Patterns | Uses platform patterns (not custom solutions)? |
| Patterns | Files in correct project locations? |
| Completeness | Success criteria defined and measurable? |
| Completeness | All edge cases considered? |
| Best Practices | Follows YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles? |
| Best Practices | No over-engineering or premature abstraction? |
| 类别 | 检查项 |
|---|---|
| 结构 | 是否包含带有YAML前置元数据(标题、状态、工作量)的plan.md文件? |
| 结构 | 阶段是否已编号且链接正确? |
| 逻辑 | 是否梳理了各阶段之间的依赖关系? |
| 逻辑 | 是否包含风险评估及缓解措施? |
| 模式 | 是否采用平台既定模式(而非自定义解决方案)? |
| 模式 | 文件是否存放于项目的正确位置? |
| 完整性 | 是否定义了可衡量的成功标准? |
| 完整性 | 是否考虑了所有边缘情况? |
| 最佳实践 | 是否遵循YAGNI/KISS/DRY原则? |
| 最佳实践 | 是否存在过度设计或过早抽象的问题? |
✅ Plan Review: APPROVED
- Structure: Valid
- Logic: Sound
- Patterns: Compliant
- Completeness: Adequate
- Best Practices: Followed
Proceeding to implementation...⚠️ Plan Review: NEEDS REVISION
Issues:
1. [Category] [File:Line] Issue description → Fix suggestion
2. [Category] [File:Line] Issue description → Fix suggestion
Update plan before proceeding.✅ Plan Review: APPROVED
- Structure: Valid
- Logic: Sound
- Patterns: Compliant
- Completeness: Adequate
- Best Practices: Followed
Proceeding to implementation...⚠️ Plan Review: NEEDS REVISION
Issues:
1. [Category] [File:Line] Issue description → Fix suggestion
2. [Category] [File:Line] Issue description → Fix suggestion
Update plan before proceeding.