[IMPORTANT] Use
to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.
Quick Summary
Goal: Generate comprehensive 26-section business feature documentation with mandatory code evidence for all test cases, plus AI companion file.
Workflow:
- Detect & Gather — Auto-detect modules from git changes OR user-specified module, read existing docs
- Investigate Code — Grep/glob codebase to gather evidence ( format) for every test case
- Write Documentation — Follow exact 26-section structure, place in
docs/business-features/{Module}/
- Generate AI Companion — Create file (max 300 lines) with domain model, file locations, key expressions
- Verification — 3-pass system: evidence audit, domain model verification, cross-reference audit
Key Rules:
- EVERY test case MUST ATTENTION have verifiable code evidence (), no exceptions
- Output must have exactly 26 sections matching the master template
- Always update CHANGELOG.md and Version History (Section 26) when modifying docs
- When writing Section 17 test cases: include an field pointing to the test file and method name. Format:
IntegrationTest: Orders/OrderCommandIntegrationTests.cs::{MethodName}
. If no integration test exists yet, set .
- Verify every TC-{MOD}-XXX in Section 17 has a corresponding
[Trait("TestSpec", "TC-{MOD}-XXX")]
in the integration test codebase. If missing, flag as .
- If third verification pass finds >5 issues, HALT and re-run verification
Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).
docs/project-reference/domain-entities-reference.md
— Domain entity catalog, relationships, cross-service sync (read when task involves business entities/models) (content auto-injected by hook — check for [Injected: ...] header before reading)
Project Pattern Discovery
Before implementation, search your codebase for project-specific patterns:
- Search for: , ,
- Look for: existing feature doc folders, 26-section templates, AI companion files
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Read the
feature-docs-reference.md
companion doc for project-specific patterns and code examples.
If file not found, continue with search-based discovery above.
Feature Documentation Generation & Verification
Generate comprehensive feature documentation following project conventions and folder structure.
GOLD STANDARD References:
Search your codebase for existing feature docs to use as reference:
bash
find docs/business-features -name "README.*.md" -type f | head -5
Template File:
docs/templates/detailed-feature-docs-template.md
AI Companion Template:
docs/templates/feature-docs-ai-template.md
[CRITICAL] MANDATORY CODE EVIDENCE RULE
EVERY test case MUST ATTENTION have verifiable code evidence. This is non-negotiable.
Evidence Format
markdown
**Evidence**: `{RelativeFilePath}:{LineNumber}` or `{RelativeFilePath}:{StartLine}-{EndLine}`
Valid vs Invalid Evidence
| Valid | Invalid |
|---|
| (template) |
| (no line) |
interviews.service.ts:115-118
| "Based on CQRS pattern" (vague) |
Output Structure
All documentation MUST ATTENTION be placed in the correct folder structure:
docs/
├── BUSINESS-FEATURES.md # Master index (UPDATE if new module)
├── templates/
│ └── detailed-feature-docs-template.md # MASTER TEMPLATE
└── business-features/
├── {Module}/ # One folder per service/module in your project
│ ├── README.md # Complete module documentation
│ ├── INDEX.md # Navigation hub
│ ├── API-REFERENCE.md # Endpoint documentation
│ ├── TROUBLESHOOTING.md # Issue resolution guide
│ └── detailed-features/
│ ├── README.{FeatureName}.md # Comprehensive (human-facing, 1000+ lines)
│ └── README.{FeatureName}.ai.md # AI companion (code-focused, 300-500 lines)
└── ...
Module Mapping
Search your codebase to discover the module-to-folder mapping:
bash
# Find all service directories
ls -d src/Services/*/
# Find all existing feature doc modules
ls -d docs/business-features/*/
Map each module code to its folder name and service path. Example pattern:
| Module Code | Folder Name | Service Path |
|---|
| {Module1} | | |
| {Module2} | | |
MANDATORY 26-SECTION STRUCTURE
All feature documentation MUST ATTENTION follow this section order:
| # | Section | Stakeholder Focus |
|---|
| 1 | Executive Summary | PO, BA |
| 2 | Business Value | PO, BA |
| 3 | Business Requirements | PO, BA |
| 4 | Business Rules | BA, Dev |
| 5 | Process Flows | BA, Dev, Architect |
| 6 | Design Reference | BA, UX, Dev |
| 7 | System Design | Dev, Architect |
| 8 | Architecture | Dev, Architect |
| 9 | Domain Model | Dev, Architect |
| 10 | API Reference | Dev, Architect |
| 11 | Frontend Components | Dev |
| 12 | Backend Controllers | Dev |
| 13 | Cross-Service Integration | Dev, Architect |
| 14 | Security Architecture | Dev, Architect |
| 15 | Performance Considerations | Dev, Architect, DevOps |
| 16 | Implementation Guide | Dev |
| 17 | Test Specifications | QA |
| 18 | Test Data Requirements | QA |
| 19 | Edge Cases Catalog | QA, Dev |
| 20 | Regression Impact | QA |
| 21 | Troubleshooting | Dev, QA, DevOps |
| 22 | Operational Runbook | DevOps |
| 23 | Roadmap and Dependencies | PO, BA |
| 24 | Related Documentation | All |
| 25 | Glossary | PO, BA |
| 26 | Version History | All |
Stakeholder Quick Navigation
| Audience | Sections |
|---|
| Product Owner | Executive Summary, Business Value, Roadmap |
| Business Analyst | Business Requirements, Business Rules, Process Flows, Domain Model |
| Developer | Architecture, Domain Model, API Reference, Implementation Guide |
| Technical Architect | System Design, Cross-Service Integration, Security, Performance |
| QA/QC | Test Specifications, Test Data, Edge Cases, Regression Impact |
| DevOps/Support | Troubleshooting, Operational Runbook |
Phase 1: Module Detection & Context Gathering
Step 1.0: Auto-Detect Modules from Git Changes (Default)
When no module or feature is explicitly specified, automatically detect affected modules from git changes:
- Run
git diff --name-only HEAD
(captures both staged and unstaged changes)
- If no uncommitted changes, run
git diff --name-only HEAD~1
(last commit)
- Extract unique module names from changed file paths using the Module Mapping table
- For each detected module, check if a business feature doc exists in
docs/business-features/{Module}/
- If docs exist → proceed to Phase 1.5 (Update Mode) for each module
- If no docs exist → skip (do not create docs from scratch without explicit user request)
- If no service-layer files changed (e.g., only , , config files) → report "No business feature docs impacted" and exit
Path-to-Module Detection Rules:
Search your codebase to build the path-to-module mapping. Common patterns:
| Changed File Path Pattern | Detected Module |
|---|
| {Module} |
{frontend-apps-dir}/{app-name}/**
| {Module} (map app name to module) |
{frontend-libs-dir}/{domain-lib}/src/{feature}/**
| {Module} (map feature to module) |
Build a project-specific mapping by examining:
bash
ls -d src/Services/*/
ls -d {frontend-apps-dir}/*/
Step 1.1: Identify Target Module
Determine which module the feature belongs to by:
- User explicitly specifies module name
- Feature name/domain implies module (search codebase to verify mapping)
- Search codebase for feature-related entities/commands
- Auto-detected from git diff (Step 1.0 above) — used when invoked as a workflow step without explicit module
Step 1.2: Read Existing Documentation
Before creating new docs, read existing structure:
- Read
docs/BUSINESS-FEATURES.md
(master index)
- Read
docs/business-features/{Module}/INDEX.md
(if exists)
- Read
docs/business-features/{Module}/README.md
(if exists)
- Identify what already exists vs what needs creation/update
Step 1.3: Codebase Analysis
Gather evidence from source code:
- Entities:
src/Services/{Module}/{Module}.Domain/Entities/
- Commands:
src/Services/{Module}/{Module}.Application/UseCaseCommands/
- Queries:
src/Services/{Module}/{Module}.Application/UseCaseQueries/
- Controllers:
src/Services/{Module}/{Module}.Service/Controllers/
- Frontend:
{frontend-apps-dir}/{app-name}/
or {frontend-libs-dir}/{domain-lib}/
Step 1.4: Feature Analysis
Build knowledge model in
.ai/workspace/analysis/[feature-name].md
.
Discovery Areas
- Domain Entity Discovery: Entities, value objects, enums
- Workflow Discovery: Commands, Queries, Event Handlers, Background Jobs
- API Discovery: Controllers, endpoints, DTOs
- Frontend Discovery: Components, Services, Stores
- Cross-Service Discovery: Message Bus messages, producers, consumers
Phase 1.5: Update Mode (when updating existing docs)
When UPDATING an existing business feature document (not creating from scratch):
Step 1.5.1: Diff Analysis
- Identify the source of changes (git diff, branch comparison, commit history)
- Categorize changes by type: backend entity, command, query, frontend component, i18n, etc.
- Map each change to impacted documentation sections (use table below)
Step 1.5.2: Section Impact Mapping
| Change Type | Impacted Sections |
|---|
| New entity property | 3 (Business Requirements), 9 (Domain Model), 10 (API Reference) |
| New API endpoint | 10 (API Reference), 12 (Backend Controllers), 14 (Security) |
| New frontend component | 11 (Frontend Components) |
| New filter/query | 3 (Business Requirements), 10 (API Reference) |
| New i18n keys | 11 (Frontend Components) |
| Any new functionality | 17 (Test Specs), 18 (Test Data), 19 (Edge Cases), 20 (Regression Impact) — MANDATORY |
| Any change | 1 (Executive Summary), 26 (Version History) — ALWAYS UPDATE |
Step 1.5.3: Mandatory Test Coverage (Sections 17-20)
CRITICAL: When documenting ANY new functionality, you MUST ATTENTION update:
-
Section 17 (Test Specifications): Add test cases (TC-{MOD}-XXX) for new features with GIVEN/WHEN/THEN format. Each TC entry should include:
markdown
#### TC-GM-001: Create SMART Goal Successfully
**Priority**: P0-Critical
**Status**: Tested | Untested
**IntegrationTest**: `Orders/OrderCommandIntegrationTests.cs::SaveOrder_WhenValidData_ShouldCreateSuccessfully`
**Evidence**: `{Service}.Application/{Feature}/Commands/Save{Feature}Command.cs:42-68`
-
Section 18 (Test Data): Add seed data required for new test cases
-
Section 19 (Edge Cases): Add edge cases for boundary conditions, error states, permission checks
-
Section 20 (Regression Impact): Add regression risk rows for impacted areas, update test suite counts
Failure to update test sections is a blocking quality issue.
Step 1.5.4: CHANGELOG Entry
Always create/update
entry under
following Keep a Changelog format.
Phase 2: Documentation Generation
Generate at
docs/business-features/{Module}/detailed-features/README.{FeatureName}.md
.
Key Format Examples
Business Requirements (FR-XX):
markdown
#### FR-{MOD}-01: {Requirement Title}
| --------------- | --------------------------------- |
| **Description** | {What this requirement enables} |
| **Scope** | {Who can use / affected entities} |
| **Evidence** | `{FilePath}:{LineRange}` |
User Stories (US-XX):
markdown
#### US-{MOD}-01: {Story Title}
**As a** {role}
**I want** {goal/desire}
**So that** {benefit/value}
**Acceptance Criteria**:
- [ ] AC-01: {Criterion with evidence reference}
- [ ] AC-02: {Criterion with evidence reference}
**Related Requirements**: FR-{MOD}-01, FR-{MOD}-02
**Evidence**: `{FilePath}:{LineRange}`
Test Summary Table (MANDATORY):
markdown
| ----------- | :-----------: | :-------: | :---------: | :------: | :-----: |
| {Category1} | {N} | {N} | {N} | {N} | {N} |
| **Total** | **{N}** | **{N}** | **{N}** | **{N}** | **{N}** |
Test Case Format (TC-XX):
markdown
#### TC-{MOD}-001: {Test Name} [P0]
**Acceptance Criteria**:
- {Passing criteria 1}
- {Passing criteria 2}
**GIVEN** {initial context}
**WHEN** {action performed}
**THEN** {expected outcome}
**Edge Cases**:
- {Invalid scenario} → {Expected error/behavior}
**Evidence**: `{FilePath}:{LineRange}`
Troubleshooting Format:
markdown
#### {Issue Title}
**Symptoms**: {Observable problem}
**Causes**:
1. {Cause 1}
2. {Cause 2}
**Resolution**:
- {Step 1}
- {Step 2}
Permission Matrix:
markdown
| Role | View | Create | Edit | Delete | Special |
| ----- | :--: | :----: | :--: | :----: | ----------- |
| Admin | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Full access |
Phase 2.5: AI Companion Generation
Generate AI-agent optimized companion file alongside the comprehensive documentation.
Output:
docs/business-features/{Module}/detailed-features/README.{FeatureName}.ai.md
Template:
docs/templates/detailed-feature-docs-template.ai.md
AI Companion Structure (10 Sections, ~260 lines)
| Section | Content | Source from Full Doc |
|---|
| Context | Purpose, entities, service | Executive Summary |
| File Locations | Exact paths to all key files | Implementation Guide |
| Domain Model | Properties, expressions | Domain Model |
| API Contracts | Endpoints, request/response shapes | API Reference |
| Business Rules | Validation, state transitions | Business Rules |
| Patterns | Required / Anti-patterns | Architecture |
| Integration | Events, dependencies | Cross-Service Integration |
| Security | Authorization matrix | Security Architecture |
| Test Scenarios | Key GIVEN/WHEN/THEN cases | Test Specifications |
| Quick Reference | Decision tree, code snippets | Implementation Guide |
Compression Rules
- Tables over prose - Convert paragraphs to table rows
- Paths over descriptions - over "located in..."
- Signatures over examples -
{ id: string } → { entity: Dto }
over full code
- Decisions over explanations - What to do, not why
AI Companion Extended (6-Section Variant, ~420 lines)
For larger features, use the extended companion format:
- Quick Reference (~40 lines) - Module, service, file locations
- Domain Model (~80 lines) - Entities, enums, value objects (condensed)
- API Contracts (~100 lines) - Signatures with DTOs only
- Validation Rules (~80 lines) - BR-XX table format
- Service Boundaries (~60 lines) - Cross-service integration
- Critical Paths (~60 lines) - Key workflows as decision trees
AI Companion Header
markdown
# {FeatureName} Feature - AI Context
> AI-optimized context file for code generation tasks.
> Full documentation: [README.{FeatureName}Feature.md](./README.{FeatureName}Feature.md)
> Last synced: {YYYY-MM-DD}
Skip These Sections in AI Companion
- Troubleshooting (operational)
- Operational Runbook (DevOps)
- Business Value (stakeholder)
- Version History (changelog)
- Glossary (definitions)
AI Companion Quality Check
Phase 3: Master Index Update
After creating/updating module docs, update
docs/BUSINESS-FEATURES.md
:
- Read current content
- Verify module is listed in the "Detailed Module Documentation" table
- Add link if missing:
markdown
| **{Module}** | [Description] | [View Details](./business-features/{Module}/README.md) |
Anti-Hallucination Protocols
<!-- SYNC:evidence-based-reasoning -->
Evidence-Based Reasoning — Speculation is FORBIDDEN. Every claim needs proof.
- Cite , grep results, or framework docs for EVERY claim
- Declare confidence: >80% act freely, 60-80% verify first, <60% DO NOT recommend
- Cross-service validation required for architectural changes
- "I don't have enough evidence" is valid and expected output
BLOCKED until: Evidence file path (
)
Grep search performed
3+ similar patterns found
Confidence level stated
Forbidden without proof: "obviously", "I think", "should be", "probably", "this is because"
If incomplete → output:
"Insufficient evidence. Verified: [...]. Not verified: [...]."
<!-- /SYNC:evidence-based-reasoning -->
DOCUMENTATION_ACCURACY_CHECKPOINT
Before writing any documentation:
- "Have I read the actual code that implements this?"
- "Are my line number references accurate and current?"
- "Can I provide a code snippet as evidence?"
TEST CASE EVIDENCE VERIFICATION
For EVERY test case:
- Read the Evidence file at claimed line number
- Verify: Does code at that line support test assertion?
- Check Edge Cases: Find error constants in
- Fix immediately if line numbers wrong
Phase 3.5: Verification (3 Passes)
First Pass - Test Case Evidence Audit
For EVERY test case in documentation:
- Read the Evidence file at the claimed line number
- Verify match: Does the code at that line support the test assertion?
- Check Edge Cases: Find error message constants in
- Fix immediately if line numbers are wrong
Second Pass - Domain Model Verification
- Read EACH entity file referenced in Domain Model section
- Verify property names, types, and line numbers
- Check enum values exist in actual source
- Remove any documented properties not found in source
Third Pass - Cross-Reference Audit
- Test Summary counts match actual test case count
- All internal links work
- No template placeholders remain (, )
- ErrorMessage.cs constants match edge case messages
CRITICAL: If ANY pass finds hallucinated content, re-investigate and fix before completing.
Quality Checklist
Structure
Test Case Evidence (MANDATORY)
Anti-Hallucination
Related
Closing Reminders
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using BEFORE starting
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ the following files before starting:
<!-- SYNC:evidence-based-reasoning:reminder -->
- IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite evidence for every claim. Confidence >80% to act, <60% = do NOT recommend.
<!-- /SYNC:evidence-based-reasoning:reminder -->