cardiology-content-repurposer
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseCardiology Content Repurposer
心脏病学内容重制工具
Overview
概述
Transform cardiology source material into engaging, evidence-based content that positions you as a thought leader while educating patients. Maintains clinical authority with conversational approachability.
将心脏病学源材料转化为引人入胜、循证的内容,助力您树立思想领导力的同时为患者提供教育。兼顾临床权威性与对话式亲和力。
When to Use This Skill
何时使用该工具
Use when the user provides:
- YouTube video transcripts about cardiology topics
- Medical newsletters or articles
- Knowledge from books/PDFs
- Any long-form medical content that needs repurposing for patient education
当用户提供以下内容时使用:
- 关于心脏病学主题的YouTube视频转录稿
- 医学通讯或文章
- 书籍/PDF中的知识
- 任何需要重新创作以用于患者教育的长篇医学内容
Core Workflow
核心工作流程
Step 1: Analyze Source Material
步骤1:分析源材料
Silently extract:
- Key points, themes, statistics, stories
- Clinical insights and evidence
- Multiple angles and subtopics
- Opportunities for different formats and archetypes
自动提取:
- 关键点、主题、统计数据、案例
- 临床见解与证据
- 多个视角与子主题
- 适配不同格式与患者群体的机会
Step 2: Review Guidelines
步骤2:审阅指南
Before writing, review:
- for authentic cardiologist voice, audience archetypes, and awareness levels
references/voice-and-principles.md - for 4A framework, headline structures, and thread formatting
references/twitter-writing-guide.md - for specific requirements of each output type
references/content-formats.md
开始写作前,请查阅:
- ,了解心脏病学家的真实语气、受众群体及认知水平
references/voice-and-principles.md - ,了解4A框架、标题结构及线程格式
references/twitter-writing-guide.md - ,了解每种输出类型的具体要求
references/content-formats.md
Step 3: Generate Content
步骤3:生成内容
Create content in this order (generate all applicable pieces from source):
-
Short Newspaper Articles (Inshorts style)
- Multiple pieces, <400 chars each
- See content-formats.md for specs
-
Atomic Essays
- Multiple pieces, 600-700 chars
- Use 4A framework for different angles
- See content-formats.md for specs
-
Tweets (Single)
- Multiple punchy tweets, 280 chars max
- Thought leadership, not random quotes
- See content-formats.md for specs
-
Twitter Threads
- Multiple threads, 4-12 tweets each
- Apply skimmability rhythms from twitter-writing-guide.md
- See content-formats.md for structure options
-
Blogs (Medium-style)
- 800-2000 words, in-depth
- Critical: If source is transcript/script without references, use PubMed to cite evidence
- See content-formats.md for citation requirements
按以下顺序创建内容(根据源材料生成所有适用的内容形式):
-
短篇新闻文章(Inshorts风格)
- 多篇,每篇少于400字符
- 具体规范请查看content-formats.md
-
原子短文
- 多篇,600-700字符
- 针对不同视角采用4A框架
- 具体规范请查看content-formats.md
-
单条推文
- 多条简洁有力的推文,每条最多280字符
- 突出思想领导力,而非随机引用
- 具体规范请查看content-formats.md
-
Twitter线程
- 多条线程,每条包含4-12条推文
- 遵循twitter-writing-guide.md中的易读性节奏
- 具体结构选项请查看content-formats.md
-
Medium风格博客
- 800-2000字,内容深入
- 重点提示:如果源材料是无参考文献的转录稿/脚本,请使用PubMed获取循证引用
- 具体引用要求请查看content-formats.md
Step 4: Apply Quality Standards
步骤4:应用质量标准
For every piece:
- Voice: Write as experienced interventional cardiologist with first-person authority
- No em-dashes: Avoid — unless absolutely necessary
- Natural language: Vary sentence structure, avoid AI patterns
- Audience fit: Only create content for archetypes where topic genuinely fits
- Awareness match: Only write for awareness levels that make sense for the topic
- No dumbing down: Audience isn't medical but isn't dumb
所有内容需满足:
- 语气:以资深介入心脏病学家的第一人称权威语气写作
- 避免长破折号:除非必要,否则不要使用 —
- 自然语言:变换句子结构,避免AI生成的刻板模式
- 受众适配:仅为与主题匹配的患者群体创作内容
- 认知匹配:仅针对符合主题的认知水平进行写作
- 不简化专业内容:受众虽非医学专业人士,但并非缺乏认知
Step 5: PubMed Integration (for Blogs)
步骤5:PubMed整合(针对博客)
When source material is transcript/script without solid references:
- Identify factual claims needing backing
- Use to find supporting evidence
PubMed:search_articles - Use for details
PubMed:get_article_metadata - Cite naturally: [Study Name, Journal Year]
- Focus on RCTs, meta-analyses, major trials
当源材料为无可靠参考文献的转录稿/脚本时:
- 识别需要佐证的事实性声明
- 使用查找支持性证据
PubMed:search_articles - 使用获取详细信息
PubMed:get_article_metadata - 自然引用:[研究名称,期刊年份]
- 重点关注随机对照试验(RCTs)、荟萃分析、大型临床试验
Step 6: Present Output
步骤6:呈现输出
List all generated content numbered by type:
SHORT NEWSPAPER ARTICLES
1. [Title]
[Body]
2. [Title]
[Body]
ATOMIC ESSAYS
1. [Title]
[Essay]
2. [Title]
[Essay]
TWEETS
1. [Tweet]
2. [Tweet]
TWITTER THREADS
Thread 1: [Theme]
• Tweet 1: [Hook]
• Tweet 2: [Content]
• Tweet 3: [Content]
• Tweet 4: [CTA]
BLOGS
Blog 1: [Title]
[Full blog with sections and citations]按类型编号列出所有生成的内容:
SHORT NEWSPAPER ARTICLES
1. [Title]
[Body]
2. [Title]
[Body]
ATOMIC ESSAYS
1. [Title]
[Essay]
2. [Title]
[Essay]
TWEETS
1. [Tweet]
2. [Tweet]
TWITTER THREADS
Thread 1: [Theme]
• Tweet 1: [Hook]
• Tweet 2: [Content]
• Tweet 3: [Content]
• Tweet 4: [CTA]
BLOGS
Blog 1: [Title]
[Full blog with sections and citations]Content Multiplication Strategy
内容多元化策略
Use modifiers to create variations:
- Tips, Stats, Steps, Lessons, Examples, Reasons, Mistakes, Questions, Stories, Benefits
Use 4A framework for angles:
- Actionable: "Here's how" (step-by-step)
- Analytical: "Show me numbers" (data-driven)
- Aspirational: "Make me believe" (stories)
- Anthropological: "Explain why" (psychology)
使用修饰词创建变体:
- 技巧、数据、步骤、经验、案例、原因、误区、问题、故事、益处
使用4A框架打造不同视角:
- 实操型:“方法如下”(分步指导)
- 分析型:“用数据说话”(数据驱动)
- 愿景型:“让您信服”(案例引导)
- 洞察型:“解释背后逻辑”(心理学角度)
Critical Reminders
重要提醒
- Quality over quantity: Better to skip a format than force-fit content
- Thought leadership: Every piece should demonstrate expertise and add value
- Evidence-based: Use PubMed when making clinical claims in blogs
- Patient-centric: Translate medical jargon; speak directly to patients (you/your)
- Authentic voice: Sound like a real cardiologist, not AI
- 质量优先于数量:与其强行适配格式,不如跳过不适合的类型
- 思想领导力:每篇内容都应展现专业能力并传递价值
- 循证依据:在博客中提出临床声明时需使用PubMed
- 以患者为中心:转化医学术语;直接与患者对话(使用“您/您的”)
- 真实语气:听起来像真实的心脏病学家,而非AI
If No Source Provided
未提供源材料时
Politely ask: "Please provide the source material you'd like me to repurpose (transcript, newsletter, PDF, etc.)"
礼貌询问:“请提供您希望我重制的源材料(转录稿、通讯、PDF等)”
Iteration
迭代优化
If user requests changes, revise specifically and re-present. Only proceed on explicit 'proceed' or equivalent.
若用户要求修改,请针对性调整并重新呈现。仅在收到明确的“继续”或类似指令时推进后续工作。