Skill
4
Agent
All Skills
Search
Tools
中文
|
EN
Explore
Loading...
Back to Details
quality-checklist
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English
🇨🇳
Translation
Chinese
Quality Checklist
质量检查表
A systematic pass through every dimension of design quality.
对设计质量的各个维度进行系统化检查。
How to use
使用方法
/quality-checklist
Run a quality evaluation on any design in this conversation.
/quality-checklist
在本次对话中对任意设计运行质量评估。
Constraints
检查维度
Hierarchy
层级结构
Clear primary element on every screen
Visual weight matches content priority
No unintentional competing elements at the same hierarchy level
Eye path follows the intended reading order
每个页面都有清晰的核心元素
视觉权重与内容优先级匹配
同一层级下无意外的竞争元素
视觉动线符合预设的阅读顺序
Typography
排版设计
Type scale uses a consistent ratio
Weight usage is systematic with named purposes
Line height varies appropriately (tighter headlines, looser body)
No more than 4-6 sizes per screen with clear justification
Typeface matches product voice
字体大小比例保持一致
字重使用系统化,且有明确的用途定义
行高根据场景合理调整(标题更紧凑,正文更宽松)
每个页面的字体大小不超过4-6种,且有明确使用理由
字体风格与产品调性匹配
Color
色彩系统
Every color has a clear, non-overlapping role
Semantic colors are consistent everywhere
Neutrals do 80-90% of the heavy lifting
Sufficient contrast for accessibility (WCAG AA minimum)
每种色彩都有清晰且不重叠的用途
语义色彩在所有场景下保持一致
中性色承担80-90%的视觉呈现工作
色彩对比度符合无障碍要求(至少达到WCAG AA标准)
Space
空间布局
Spacing follows a consistent scale
Proximity signals correct relationships
Density matches the use case
Margins create appropriate breathing room
间距遵循统一的尺度规范
元素间距传递正确的关联关系
信息密度与使用场景匹配
边距提供合适的视觉呼吸感
Craft
设计工艺
Border radii consistent across element types
Alignment pixel-perfect where intended
All states covered: loading, empty, error, success, overflow
Transitions purposeful and consistently timed
不同元素类型的圆角半径保持一致
需对齐的元素实现像素级精准对齐
覆盖所有状态:加载中、空态、错误、成功、溢出
过渡动画有明确目的,且时长保持一致
System
系统扩展性
Design could scale to 10 more screens without breaking
Another designer could extend this without asking questions
Components are reusable, not one-offs
System breaks are intentional, not accidental
设计可扩展至10个以上页面且不破坏规范
其他设计师无需询问即可进行扩展设计
组件具备可复用性,非一次性设计
规范的突破是有意为之,而非意外情况
Anti-Patterns
反模式
Checking only visual polish and ignoring information architecture
Treating the checklist as pass/fail instead of diagnostic
Running the checklist once and never revisiting
仅检查视觉细节,忽略信息架构
将检查表视为合格/不合格的评判标准,而非诊断工具
仅运行一次检查表,后续不再复查