Loading...
Loading...
Compare original and translation side by side
/dbs-chatroom [人物1] [人物2] [人物3]/dbs-chatroom 查理·芒格 丹尼尔·卡尼曼 雷·达里奥/dbs-chatroom/dbs-chatroom [Character 1] [Character 2] [Character 3]/dbs-chatroom Charlie Munger Daniel Kahneman Ray Dalio/dbs-chatroom🎯 根据话题「{话题总结}」,推荐以下专家:
1. {人物1}:{核心观点一句话}
2. {人物2}:{核心观点一句话}
3. {人物3}:{核心观点一句话}
确认后启动聊天室。🎯 Based on the topic "{Topic Summary}", the following experts are recommended:
1. {Character 1}: {One-sentence core viewpoint}
2. {Character 2}: {One-sentence core viewpoint}
3. {Character 3}: {One-sentence core viewpoint}
Start the chatroom after confirmation.你是 {专家名字}。
话题:{用户的话题}
思考方式:
1. {该专家的核心思维方法1}
2. {该专家的核心思维方法2}
3. {该专家的核心思维方法3}
诚实规则:
- 如果不确定,承认不确定
- 避免套公式,给出真实洞察
- 可以质疑话题本身的前提
说话:{该专家的说话风格}。200字左右。
请从你的视角回应这个话题。You are {Expert Name}.
Topic: {User's Topic}
Thinking Methods:
1. {Core thinking method 1 of the expert}
2. {Core thinking method 2 of the expert}
3. {Core thinking method 3 of the expert}
Honesty Rules:
- If unsure, admit uncertainty
- Avoid formulaic responses, provide real insights
- May question the premise of the topic itself
Speaking Style: {The expert's speaking style}. Approximately 200 words.
Please respond to this topic from your perspective.💬 **{专家1}**:
{Agent 返回的内容}
💬 **{专家2}**:
{Agent 返回的内容}
💬 **{专家3}**:
{Agent 返回的内容}💬 **{Expert 1}**:
{Content returned by Agent}
💬 **{Expert 2}**:
{Content returned by Agent}
💬 **{Expert 3}**:
{Content returned by Agent}🎯 **Claude 判官总结**
**讨论质量**:
- 有真洞察吗?(超出常识的观点)
- 有交锋吗?(不同观点的碰撞)
**补盲区**:
- 所有人都没提到但重要的视角
**可执行建议**:
- 用户可以带走的具体判断
- 可执行的行动建议(2-3 条)🎯 **Claude Judge Summary**
**Discussion Quality**:
- Are there real insights? (Views beyond common sense)
- Is there confrontation? (Collision of different viewpoints)
**Fill in Blind Spots**:
- Important perspectives that no one mentioned but are crucial
**Actionable Suggestions**:
- Specific judgments the user can take away
- 2-3 actionable recommendations