targeted-chatroom: Targeted Chat Room

Workflow

Step 1: Detect Mode

• Format:

  /定向聊天室 [Character 1] [Character 2] [Character 3]

• Example:

  /定向聊天室 查理·芒格 丹尼尔·卡尼曼 雷·达里奥

• Action: Skip directly to Step 3

• Format:

  /定向聊天室

  (or other trigger words)
• Action: Proceed to Step 2

Step 2: Recommend Characters (Scenario B only)

🎯 Based on the topic 「{topic summary}」, the following experts are recommended:

1. {Character 1}: {One-sentence core viewpoint}
2. {Character 2}: {One-sentence core viewpoint}
3. {Character 3}: {One-sentence core viewpoint}

Start the chat room after confirmation.

Step 3: Generate Conversations (use Agent tool)

Prompt Template Structure

You are {expert name}.

Topic: {user's topic}

Thinking methods:
1. {Core thinking method 1 of the expert}
2. {Core thinking method 2 of the expert}
3. {Core thinking method 3 of the expert}

Honesty rules:
- If you are not sure, admit uncertainty
- Avoid rigid formulas, provide real insights
- You can question the premise of the topic itself

Speaking style: {speaking style of the expert}. Around 200 words.

Please respond to this topic from your perspective.

Key points for dynamically generating expert prompts

1. Thinking methods: Extract the 3 core thinking methods of the expert
   • For example, Munger: 「Reverse thinking」, 「Multiple thinking models」, 「Incentive mechanism analysis」
   • For example, Adler: 「Teleological perspective」, 「Social situation analysis」, 「Courage psychology」
2. Honesty rules: Use the above template uniformly to ensure that experts will not force answers
3. Speaking style: Summarize the expression characteristics of the expert in one sentence
   • For example, Munger: 「Direct, sharp, speaks with business cases」
   • For example, Adler: 「Gentle but sharp, uses life scenarios as examples, emphasizes action」
4. Around 200 words: Clear requirement to ensure the output has substantive content

Output Format

💬 **{Expert 1}**:
{Content returned by Agent}

💬 **{Expert 2}**:
{Content returned by Agent}

💬 **{Expert 3}**:
{Content returned by Agent}

Step 4: Judge's Summary

🎯 **Claude Judge Summary**

**Discussion quality**:
- Are there real insights? (Views beyond common sense)
- Is there any confrontation? (Collision of different views)

**Blind spot supplement**:
- Important perspectives that no one mentioned

**Actionable suggestions**:
- Specific judgments that users can take away
- Actionable suggestions (2-3 items)

Notes

1. Must use Agent tool: Each expert corresponds to an independent Agent, called in parallel
2. Must wait for confirmation in recommendation mode: Do not start the conversation on your own initiative
3. Judge summary is mandatory: This is the core value of the skill
4. Around 200 words: Each expert's reply should have substantive content and not be too short
5. Dynamically generate prompts: Customize thinking methods and speaking styles according to the characteristics of experts