crit-work
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseRead and run it on the user's work in progress.
../crit-shared/METHOD.md阅读 ,并对用户的创作中作品执行该方法。
../crit-shared/METHOD.mdSeeing the work
观察作品
Look at the work yourself before the first round:
- Pasted images or screenshots: view them directly.
- Figma links: use the Figma tools (,
get_screenshot).get_design_context - Open Photoshop files: use and
photoshop_get_preview.photoshop_get_layers - Motion: ask for keyframes, a frame strip, or a description of timing and easing.
The crit is read-only: question the work, leave the file untouched. Fixes belong in a separate request the user makes afterward.
在第一轮评审之前,先亲自查看作品:
- 粘贴的图片或截图:直接查看。
- Figma 链接:使用 Figma 工具(、
get_screenshot)。get_design_context - 打开的 Photoshop 文件:使用 和
photoshop_get_preview。photoshop_get_layers - 动态内容:索取关键帧、帧序列条,或关于时间安排与缓动的说明。
评审过程仅限只读:可以对作品提出问题,但不要修改文件。修改应由用户在之后单独提出请求。
The tree
评审框架
Root branches:
- Intent: what is this meant to do, and for whom? Ask before judging.
- First read: what you see first, second, third — and whether that matches the intent.
- Discipline craft: the bank for this discipline in METHOD.md.
- What's working: name it, so it survives the next iteration.
- Versions: 2–3 directions the next iteration could take.
Frame each observation as a question with a recommendation ("The headline and image compete for first read — which should win? ➡️ the image; drop the headline a weight"), so the designer's judgement makes the call.
Done when every observation has a decision or is parked. Next command: if the next iteration will use AI tools, or again on the revision.
/crit-prompt/crit-work根分支:
- 意图:这件作品要做什么,面向哪些用户?评判之前先询问。
- 初读体验:你首先、其次、第三个注意到什么?这是否符合创作意图?
- 专业技法:METHOD.md 中对应专业领域的技法库。
- 值得保留之处:明确指出有效之处,使其能在下一轮迭代中保留下来。
- 版本方向:下一轮迭代可以尝试的 2–3 个方向。
将每项观察表述为一个带有建议的问题(“标题和图像在争夺第一视觉焦点——应该由谁胜出?➡️ 图像;降低标题的视觉权重”),让设计师自行作出判断。
完成标准:每项观察都已有明确决定,或被暂时搁置。下一条命令:如果下一轮迭代将使用 AI 工具,则执行 ;如果要对修改稿继续评审,则再次执行 。
/crit-prompt/crit-work