workshop-facilitation

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Purpose

目的

Provide the canonical facilitation pattern for interactive skills: one step at a time, with clear progress, adaptive recommendations at decision points, and predictable interruption handling.
为交互式技能提供标准化的引导模式:逐步推进,进度清晰,在决策点提供自适应建议,并可处理可预见的中断。

Key Concepts

核心概念

  • One-step-at-a-time: Ask a single targeted question per turn.
  • Session heads-up + entry mode: Start by setting expectations and offering
    Guided
    ,
    Context dump
    , or
    Best guess
    mode.
  • Progress visibility: Show user-facing progress labels like
    Context Qx/8
    and
    Scoring Qx/5
    .
  • Decision-point recommendations: Use enumerated options only when a choice is needed, not after every answer.
  • Quick-select response options: For regular context/scoring questions, provide concise numbered answer options plus
    Other (specify)
    when useful.
  • Flexible selection parsing: Accept
    #1
    ,
    1
    ,
    1 and 3
    ,
    1,3
    , or custom text, then synthesize multi-select choices.
  • Context-aware progression: Build on previous answers and avoid re-asking resolved questions.
  • Interruption-safe flow: Answer meta questions directly (for example, "how many left?"), restate status, then resume.
  • Fast path: If the user requests a single-shot output, skip multi-turn facilitation and deliver a condensed result.
  • 逐步推进: 每一轮仅提出一个针对性问题。
  • 会话提示 + 进入模式: 开场先明确预期,提供
    Guided
    (引导式)、
    Context dump
    (上下文导入)或
    Best guess
    (最佳推测)模式。
  • 进度可见性: 向用户展示进度标签,如
    Context Qx/8
    Scoring Qx/5
  • 决策点建议: 仅在需要做出选择时使用编号选项,而非在每个回答后都提供。
  • 快速选择响应选项: 对于常规的上下文/评分问题,提供简洁的编号回答选项,必要时添加“Other (specify)”(其他(请说明))。
  • 灵活选择解析: 接受
    #1
    1
    1 and 3
    1,3
    或自定义文本,然后整合多选选项。
  • 上下文感知推进: 基于之前的回答推进流程,避免重复询问已解决的问题。
  • 抗中断流程: 直接回答元问题(例如“还剩多少个问题?”),说明当前状态后再继续流程。
  • 快速通道: 如果用户要求一次性输出,跳过多轮引导,直接提供精简结果。

Application

应用步骤

  1. Start with a brief heads-up on estimated time and number of questions.
  2. Ask the user to choose an entry mode:
    • 1
      Guided mode (one question at a time)
    • 2
      Context dump (paste known context; skip redundancies)
    • 3
      Best guess mode (infer missing details and label assumptions)
  3. Run one question per turn and wait for an answer before continuing.
  4. Keep questions plain-language; include a short example response format when helpful.
  5. Show progress each turn:
    • Context Qx/8
      during context collection
    • Scoring Qx/5
      during assessment/scoring
  6. Ask follow-up clarifications only when they materially improve recommendation quality.
  7. For regular context/scoring questions, offer quick-select numbered response options when practical:
    • Keep options concise and mutually exclusive when possible.
    • Include
      Other (specify)
      if likely answers are open-ended.
    • Accept multi-select responses like
      1,3
      or
      1 and 3
      .
  8. Provide numbered recommendations only at decision points:
    • after context synthesis,
    • after maturity/profile synthesis,
    • during priority/action-plan selection.
  9. Accept numeric or custom choices, synthesize multi-select choices, and continue.
  10. If interrupted by a meta question, answer directly, then restate progress and pending question.
  11. If the user says stop/pause, halt immediately and wait for explicit resume.
  12. End with a clear summary, decisions made, and (if best guess mode was used) an
    Assumptions to Validate
    list.
  1. 开场简要说明预计耗时和问题数量。
  2. 请用户选择进入模式:
    • 1
      Guided模式(逐步提问)
    • 2
      Context dump模式(粘贴已知上下文;跳过重复内容)
    • 3
      Best guess模式(推断缺失细节并标注假设)
  3. 每轮提出一个问题,等待回答后再继续。
  4. 使用通俗易懂的语言提问;必要时附上简短的示例回复格式。
  5. 每轮展示进度:
    • 上下文收集阶段显示
      Context Qx/8
    • 评估/评分阶段显示
      Scoring Qx/5
  6. 仅当后续澄清能切实提升建议质量时,才提出跟进问题。
  7. 对于常规的上下文/评分问题,尽可能提供快速选择的编号响应选项:
    • 选项应简洁,尽可能互斥。
    • 如果可能的答案具有开放性,添加“Other (specify)”。
    • 接受
      1,3
      1 and 3
      这类多选回复。
  8. 仅在决策点提供编号建议:
    • 上下文整合后
    • 成熟度/概况整合后
    • 优先级/行动计划选择期间
  9. 接受数字或自定义选择,整合多选选项后继续流程。
  10. 如果被元问题打断,直接回答后,说明当前进度和待处理问题。
  11. 如果用户表示停止/暂停,立即中止流程,等待明确的恢复指令。
  12. 流程结束时提供清晰的总结、已做出的决策,以及(若使用了Best guess模式)“Assumptions to Validate”(待验证假设)列表。

Examples

示例

Opening: "Quick heads-up: this should take about 7-10 minutes and around 10 questions. How do you want to start?
  1. Guided mode
  2. Context dump
  3. Best guess mode"
User: "2"
Facilitator: "Paste what you already know. I’ll skip answered areas and ask only what’s missing."
Decision point after synthesis:
  1. Prioritize Context Design (Recommended)
  2. Prioritize Agent Orchestration
  3. Prioritize Team-AI Facilitation
User: "1 and 3"
Facilitator: "Great. We’ll run Context Design first, with Team-AI Facilitation in parallel."
开场: "温馨提示:此流程约需7-10分钟,包含约10个问题。您希望以哪种方式开始?
  1. Guided模式
  2. Context dump模式
  3. Best guess模式"
用户: "2"
引导者: "请粘贴您已知的内容。我会跳过已涵盖的部分,仅询问缺失的信息。"
整合后的决策点:
  1. 优先处理上下文设计(推荐)
  2. 优先处理Agent编排
  3. 优先处理团队-AI协作引导
用户: "1和3"
引导者: "好的。我们将先开展上下文设计,同时并行推进团队-AI协作引导。"

Common Pitfalls

常见误区

  • Asking multiple questions in the same turn.
  • Offering recommendations after every answer (creates interaction drag).
  • Using shorthand labels without plain-language questions.
  • Hiding progress, so users don't know how much remains.
  • Ignoring the user's chosen option or custom direction.
  • Failing to label assumptions when running in best-guess mode.
  • 同一轮提出多个问题。
  • 在每个回答后都提供建议(增加交互负担)。
  • 使用简写标签而不搭配通俗易懂的问题。
  • 隐藏进度,导致用户不清楚剩余工作量。
  • 忽略用户选择的模式或自定义指令。
  • 使用Best guess模式时未标注假设。

References

参考资料

  • Use as the source of truth for interactive facilitation behavior.
  • Apply alongside workshop skills in
    skills/*-workshop/SKILL.md
    and advisor-style interactive skills.
  • 作为交互式引导行为的权威参考依据。
  • skills/*-workshop/SKILL.md
    中的工作坊技能以及顾问式交互式技能配合使用。