workshop-facilitation
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChinesePurpose
目的
Provide the canonical facilitation pattern for interactive skills: one step at a time, with clear progress, adaptive recommendations at decision points, and predictable interruption handling.
为交互式技能提供标准化的引导模式:逐步推进,进度清晰,在决策点提供自适应建议,并可处理可预见的中断。
Key Concepts
核心概念
- One-step-at-a-time: Ask a single targeted question per turn.
- Session heads-up + entry mode: Start by setting expectations and offering ,
Guided, orContext dumpmode.Best guess - Progress visibility: Show user-facing progress labels like and
Context Qx/8.Scoring Qx/5 - Decision-point recommendations: Use enumerated options only when a choice is needed, not after every answer.
- Quick-select response options: For regular context/scoring questions, provide concise numbered answer options plus when useful.
Other (specify) - Flexible selection parsing: Accept ,
#1,1,1 and 3, or custom text, then synthesize multi-select choices.1,3 - Context-aware progression: Build on previous answers and avoid re-asking resolved questions.
- Interruption-safe flow: Answer meta questions directly (for example, "how many left?"), restate status, then resume.
- Fast path: If the user requests a single-shot output, skip multi-turn facilitation and deliver a condensed result.
- 逐步推进: 每一轮仅提出一个针对性问题。
- 会话提示 + 进入模式: 开场先明确预期,提供(引导式)、
Guided(上下文导入)或Context dump(最佳推测)模式。Best guess - 进度可见性: 向用户展示进度标签,如和
Context Qx/8。Scoring Qx/5 - 决策点建议: 仅在需要做出选择时使用编号选项,而非在每个回答后都提供。
- 快速选择响应选项: 对于常规的上下文/评分问题,提供简洁的编号回答选项,必要时添加“Other (specify)”(其他(请说明))。
- 灵活选择解析: 接受、
#1、1、1 and 3或自定义文本,然后整合多选选项。1,3 - 上下文感知推进: 基于之前的回答推进流程,避免重复询问已解决的问题。
- 抗中断流程: 直接回答元问题(例如“还剩多少个问题?”),说明当前状态后再继续流程。
- 快速通道: 如果用户要求一次性输出,跳过多轮引导,直接提供精简结果。
Application
应用步骤
- Start with a brief heads-up on estimated time and number of questions.
- Ask the user to choose an entry mode:
- Guided mode (one question at a time)
1 - Context dump (paste known context; skip redundancies)
2 - Best guess mode (infer missing details and label assumptions)
3
- Run one question per turn and wait for an answer before continuing.
- Keep questions plain-language; include a short example response format when helpful.
- Show progress each turn:
- during context collection
Context Qx/8 - during assessment/scoring
Scoring Qx/5
- Ask follow-up clarifications only when they materially improve recommendation quality.
- For regular context/scoring questions, offer quick-select numbered response options when practical:
- Keep options concise and mutually exclusive when possible.
- Include if likely answers are open-ended.
Other (specify) - Accept multi-select responses like or
1,3.1 and 3
- Provide numbered recommendations only at decision points:
- after context synthesis,
- after maturity/profile synthesis,
- during priority/action-plan selection.
- Accept numeric or custom choices, synthesize multi-select choices, and continue.
- If interrupted by a meta question, answer directly, then restate progress and pending question.
- If the user says stop/pause, halt immediately and wait for explicit resume.
- End with a clear summary, decisions made, and (if best guess mode was used) an list.
Assumptions to Validate
- 开场简要说明预计耗时和问题数量。
- 请用户选择进入模式:
- Guided模式(逐步提问)
1 - Context dump模式(粘贴已知上下文;跳过重复内容)
2 - Best guess模式(推断缺失细节并标注假设)
3
- 每轮提出一个问题,等待回答后再继续。
- 使用通俗易懂的语言提问;必要时附上简短的示例回复格式。
- 每轮展示进度:
- 上下文收集阶段显示
Context Qx/8 - 评估/评分阶段显示
Scoring Qx/5
- 上下文收集阶段显示
- 仅当后续澄清能切实提升建议质量时,才提出跟进问题。
- 对于常规的上下文/评分问题,尽可能提供快速选择的编号响应选项:
- 选项应简洁,尽可能互斥。
- 如果可能的答案具有开放性,添加“Other (specify)”。
- 接受或
1,3这类多选回复。1 and 3
- 仅在决策点提供编号建议:
- 上下文整合后
- 成熟度/概况整合后
- 优先级/行动计划选择期间
- 接受数字或自定义选择,整合多选选项后继续流程。
- 如果被元问题打断,直接回答后,说明当前进度和待处理问题。
- 如果用户表示停止/暂停,立即中止流程,等待明确的恢复指令。
- 流程结束时提供清晰的总结、已做出的决策,以及(若使用了Best guess模式)“Assumptions to Validate”(待验证假设)列表。
Examples
示例
Opening:
"Quick heads-up: this should take about 7-10 minutes and around 10 questions. How do you want to start?
- Guided mode
- Context dump
- Best guess mode"
User: "2"
Facilitator: "Paste what you already know. I’ll skip answered areas and ask only what’s missing."
Decision point after synthesis:
- Prioritize Context Design (Recommended)
- Prioritize Agent Orchestration
- Prioritize Team-AI Facilitation
User: "1 and 3"
Facilitator: "Great. We’ll run Context Design first, with Team-AI Facilitation in parallel."
开场:
"温馨提示:此流程约需7-10分钟,包含约10个问题。您希望以哪种方式开始?
- Guided模式
- Context dump模式
- Best guess模式"
用户: "2"
引导者: "请粘贴您已知的内容。我会跳过已涵盖的部分,仅询问缺失的信息。"
整合后的决策点:
- 优先处理上下文设计(推荐)
- 优先处理Agent编排
- 优先处理团队-AI协作引导
用户: "1和3"
引导者: "好的。我们将先开展上下文设计,同时并行推进团队-AI协作引导。"
Common Pitfalls
常见误区
- Asking multiple questions in the same turn.
- Offering recommendations after every answer (creates interaction drag).
- Using shorthand labels without plain-language questions.
- Hiding progress, so users don't know how much remains.
- Ignoring the user's chosen option or custom direction.
- Failing to label assumptions when running in best-guess mode.
- 同一轮提出多个问题。
- 在每个回答后都提供建议(增加交互负担)。
- 使用简写标签而不搭配通俗易懂的问题。
- 隐藏进度,导致用户不清楚剩余工作量。
- 忽略用户选择的模式或自定义指令。
- 使用Best guess模式时未标注假设。
References
参考资料
- Use as the source of truth for interactive facilitation behavior.
- Apply alongside workshop skills in and advisor-style interactive skills.
skills/*-workshop/SKILL.md
- 作为交互式引导行为的权威参考依据。
- 与中的工作坊技能以及顾问式交互式技能配合使用。
skills/*-workshop/SKILL.md