Loading...
Loading...
Compare original and translation side by side
skill-creatorundefinedskill-creatorundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined
**Manual evaluation**: See `references/evaluation_checklist.md`.
**手动评估**:请查看`references/evaluation_checklist.md`。Review Workflow:
- [ ] Clone repository to /tmp/
- [ ] Read ALL documentation first
- [ ] Identify author's intent
- [ ] Run evaluation checklist
- [ ] Generate improvement report评审工作流:
- [ ] 将仓库克隆到/tmp/目录
- [ ] 先阅读所有文档
- [ ] 明确作者的设计意图
- [ ] 执行评估检查表
- [ ] 生成改进报告Auto-PR Workflow:
- [ ] Fork repository (gh repo fork)
- [ ] Create feature branch
- [ ] Apply additive improvements only
- [ ] Self-review: respect check passed?
- [ ] Create PR with detailed explanation自动PR工作流:
- [ ] 复刻仓库(gh repo fork)
- [ ] 创建功能分支
- [ ] 仅做增量改进
- [ ] 自我评审:是否通过尊重性检查?
- [ ] 创建带有详细说明的PR| Category | Check | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Frontmatter | name present? | |
| description present? | ||
| description in third-person? | ||
| includes trigger conditions? | ||
| Instructions | imperative form? | |
| under 500 lines? | ||
| workflow pattern? | ||
| Resources | no hardcoded paths? | |
| scripts have error handling? |
references/evaluation_checklist.md| 分类 | 检查项 | 状态 |
|---|---|---|
| 前置元数据 | 是否包含名称? | |
| 是否包含描述? | ||
| 描述是否为第三人称? | ||
| 是否包含触发条件? | ||
| 操作说明 | 是否为祈使句式? | |
| 内容是否少于500行? | ||
| 是否包含工作流模式? | ||
| 资源文件 | 是否存在硬编码路径? | |
| 脚本是否包含错误处理? |
references/evaluation_checklist.md❌ "Removed metadata.json (non-standard)"
✅ "Added marketplace.json (metadata.json preserved)"
❌ "Rewrote README in English"
✅ "Added README.en.md (Chinese preserved as default)"❌ “移除了metadata.json(非标准文件)”
✅ “添加了marketplace.json(保留原metadata.json)”
❌ “将README重写为英文”
✅ “添加了README.en.md(保留中文为默认语言)”undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedmkdir -p .claude-pluginmkdir -p .claude-plugin
See `references/marketplace_template.json`.
请查看`references/marketplace_template.json`。❌ "Your skill doesn't follow best practices"
✅ "This PR aligns with best practices for better discoverability"
❌ "Fixed the incorrect description"
✅ "Improved description with trigger conditions"❌ “你的技能不符合最佳实践”
✅ “本次PR调整以符合最佳实践,提升技能可发现性”
❌ “修复了错误的描述”
✅ “为描述添加了触发条件,进行了优化”references/pr_template.mdreferences/pr_template.mdRespect Check:
- [ ] No files deleted?
- [ ] No functionality removed?
- [ ] Original language preserved?
- [ ] Author's design decisions respected?
- [ ] All changes are additive?
- [ ] PR explains the "why"?尊重性检查:
- [ ] 未删除任何文件?
- [ ] 未移除任何功能?
- [ ] 保留了原始语言?
- [ ] 尊重了作者的设计决策?
- [ ] 所有修改均为增量改进?
- [ ] PR中说明了修改原因?references/evaluation_checklist.mdreferences/pr_template.mdreferences/marketplace_template.jsonreferences/evaluation_checklist.mdreferences/pr_template.mdreferences/marketplace_template.json