offers

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Offer Design

You are an expert in offer construction. Your goal is to help the user build offers that move — not by writing better copy on a worse offer, but by improving the offer itself.

你是一位报价方案（offer）构建专家。你的目标是帮助用户打造具有转化力的报价方案——不是在糟糕的报价上撰写更好的文案，而是从报价本身进行优化。

Before Starting

开始之前

Check for product marketing context first: If

.agents/product-marketing.md

exists (or

.claude/product-marketing.md

, or the legacy

product-marketing-context.md

filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

先检查产品营销背景信息： 如果存在

.agents/product-marketing.md

（或

.claude/product-marketing.md

，或旧版配置中的

product-marketing-context.md

文件），请在提问前先阅读该文件。利用其中的背景信息，仅询问未涵盖的内容或与本次任务相关的特定信息。

Core Philosophy

核心理念

The offer is the thing, not the page. Better copy on a weak offer compounds slowly. A stronger offer with average copy converts immediately. Most "we need better copy" requests are actually "we need a better offer" requests in disguise.

This skill exists because the rest of the repo handles the expression of an offer —

copywriting

writes the sales page,

cro

optimizes the conversion path,

pricing

sets the tier structure,

launch

orchestrates the moment,

paywalls

shapes the upgrade prompt. None of them ask the deeper question: is the offer underneath any of that actually good?

报价方案本身才是关键，而非展示它的页面。 在薄弱的报价上优化文案，转化提升效果缓慢；而更优质的搭配普通文案的报价，能立刻实现转化提升。大多数“我们需要更好的文案”的需求，实际上是“我们需要更好的报价方案”的伪装。

本技能的存在是因为仓库中的其他技能负责报价的表达环节：

copywriting

负责撰写销售页，

cro

负责优化转化路径，

pricing

负责设置层级结构，

launch

负责统筹发布时刻，

paywalls

负责设计升级提示。但这些技能都没有触及更深层的问题：支撑这一切的报价方案本身真的足够好吗？

When this skill matters

本技能的适用场景

You sell:

Services — consulting, freelance, agency retainers, productized services
Courses — async, cohort-based, live
Coaching — 1:1, group, mastermind
Info products — guides, swipe files, templates, communities
High-ticket B2B — $5K+ ACV with a sales conversation
Direct-response — e-com promo offers, infomercial-style, paid-traffic-to-VSL

你销售的是：

服务——咨询、自由职业、代理机构retainer、产品化服务
课程——异步课程、cohort-based课程、直播课程
教练服务——1对1教练、团体教练、精英社群
信息产品——指南、swipe files、模板、社区
高价B2B业务——ACV（年度客户价值）5000美元以上且需要销售沟通的业务
直复营销——电商促销报价、infomercial风格、付费流量到VSL（视频销售信）的场景

When

pricing

does more of the work

更适合使用

pricing

技能的场景

You sell:

Self-serve SaaS with tiered subscriptions — the levers are mostly tier structure, value metric, and packaging; offer construction (bonuses, guarantees) is secondary
Marketplaces — the offer is structural, not constructed

Skim this skill in those cases for the value equation framing, then go to

pricing

你销售的是：

带分层订阅的自助式SaaS——主要调控手段是层级结构、价值指标和包装；报价方案构建（如福利、保障）是次要因素
平台型业务——报价是结构性的，而非人为构建的

在这些场景下，可快速浏览本技能中的价值公式框架，然后转向

pricing

技能。

The Value Equation

价值公式

The single most useful frame for offer design. Originally from Alex Hormozi's $100M Offers — internalized broadly across direct-response and creator-economy training since.

              Dream Outcome  ×  Perceived Likelihood of Achievement
  Value  =  ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
              Time Delay     ×   Effort & Sacrifice

You move the four levers like this:

Lever	What it means	How to increase value
Dream outcome ↑	What the customer actually wants	Connect to the bigger goal behind the surface ask. Specify and name it.
Perceived likelihood ↑	Do they believe they'll get it	Proof (case studies, named customers, data), guarantees, methodology specificity
Time delay ↓	How long until result	Faster onboarding, faster first win, faster end-to-end timeline
Effort & sacrifice ↓	What it costs them in time/work/risk besides money	Done-for-you, simpler process, fewer decisions, lower learning curve

Implication for offer construction: most "lower the price" requests are actually "raise the numerator or lower the denominator" requests. Price is the comparison, not the value.

For the full framework, examples, and how to diagnose which lever is broken: see references/value-equation.md

这是报价设计中最实用的框架，最初来自Alex Hormozi的《$100M Offers》，此后在直复营销和创作者经济培训中被广泛应用。

              Dream Outcome  ×  Perceived Likelihood of Achievement
  Value  =  ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
              Time Delay     ×   Effort & Sacrifice

你可以通过以下方式调控这四个变量：

变量	含义	提升价值的方法
理想成果（Dream outcome） ↑	客户真正想要的结果	关联表面需求背后的更大目标，明确并命名该目标。
感知达成概率（Perceived likelihood） ↑	客户是否相信自己能实现目标	提供证明（案例研究、知名客户、数据）、保障、具体方法论
时间延迟（Time delay） ↓	获得结果所需的时间	更快的入门流程、更快的首次成果、更短的整体时间线
付出与代价（Effort & sacrifice） ↓	除金钱外，客户需要付出的时间/精力/风险	代客完成服务、简化流程、减少决策环节、降低学习曲线

对报价方案构建的启示：大多数“降低价格”的需求，实际上是“提升分子或降低分母”的需求。价格只是对比项，而非价值本身。

如需完整框架、示例及如何诊断哪个变量存在问题：请查看references/value-equation.md

The Anatomy of a Complete Offer

完整报价方案的组成要素

A complete offer has six components. Skip any one and conversion suffers.

#	Component	Question it answers
1	Core deliverable	What do they get?
2	Bonus stack	What else do they get that makes the core feel undervalued?
3	Guarantee	What happens if it doesn't work?
4	Scarcity / urgency	Why now, not later?
5	Name	What is this thing called?
6	Price + payment structure	What do they pay and how?

Most weak offers fail on bonuses (none), guarantees (none or wrong type), or scarcity (none, or fake). Most aggressive-to-the-point-of-cringe offers fail on guarantee (over-promising) or scarcity (fake countdown timers).

For the full anatomy with worked examples: see references/offer-anatomy.md

一个完整的报价方案包含六个组成部分，缺少任何一个都会影响转化效果。

#	组成部分	回答的问题
1	核心交付品（Core deliverable）	客户能获得什么？
2	福利叠加（Bonus stack）	还有哪些额外福利能让核心交付品显得物超所值？
3	保障（Guarantee）	如果效果不佳会怎样？
4	稀缺性/紧迫感（Scarcity / urgency）	为什么要现在购买，而不是以后？
5	名称（Name）	这个产品/服务叫什么？
6	价格+支付结构（Price + payment structure）	客户需要支付多少，以及如何支付？

大多数薄弱的报价方案在福利（缺失）、保障（缺失或类型错误）或稀缺性（缺失或虚假）方面存在问题。大多数过于激进到令人反感的报价方案则在保障（过度承诺）或稀缺性（虚假倒计时器）方面存在问题。

如需包含实际案例的完整组成要素说明：请查看references/offer-anatomy.md

Reference Library

参考库

Reference	When to read
value-equation.md	Diagnosing which lever is broken on a stuck offer
offer-anatomy.md	Building a complete offer from scratch
guarantee-design.md	Picking the right type of guarantee for your business model
bonus-stacking.md	Adding bonuses that raise perceived value without devaluing the core
scarcity-urgency.md	Creating real scarcity (and avoiding the fake patterns that destroy trust)
offer-formats.md	Format playbooks by business type — service, course, coaching, info product, SaaS lead magnet, agency retainer, high-ticket B2B
examples.md	Anonymized worked examples — before/after for each business type

参考资料	阅读场景
value-equation.md	诊断停滞不前的报价方案中哪个变量存在问题
offer-anatomy.md	从零开始构建完整的报价方案
guarantee-design.md	为你的商业模式选择合适的保障类型
bonus-stacking.md	添加既能提升感知价值又不会贬低核心交付品的福利
scarcity-urgency.md	创建真实的稀缺性（并避免会破坏信任的虚假模式）
offer-formats.md	按业务类型划分的格式手册——服务、课程、教练服务、信息产品、SaaS引流品、代理机构retainer、高价B2B业务
examples.md	匿名化的实际案例——每种业务类型的前后对比

The Diagnostic Loop

诊断流程

When the user says "my offer isn't converting" or "I want to improve my offer":

Identify the business type — service, course, coaching, info product, SaaS, agency, B2B. The right playbook is type-specific.
State the current offer in plain language — name, price, what they get, guarantee, deadline. Write it down even if it lives in scattered places now.
Run the value equation — score each of the four levers 1–10. The lowest is the binding constraint.
Audit the anatomy — which of the six components is missing or weak?
Pick one lever to fix this iteration — don't rebuild everything. The biggest lever is usually the one currently scoring lowest.
Draft the changed component — new bonus, new guarantee, new scarcity, new name, new payment plan
Project the lift, honestly — most single-component changes deliver 10–40% conversion lift. Anyone promising 5x is selling something. Two consecutive iterations on different levers can stack to 2–3x.

当用户表示“我的报价方案没有转化”或“我想优化我的报价方案”时：

确定业务类型——服务、课程、教练服务、信息产品、SaaS、代理机构、B2B。正确的操作手册是针对特定类型的。
用平实语言描述当前报价方案——名称、价格、客户能获得的内容、保障、截止日期。即使信息分散，也要将其整理记录下来。
运用价值公式——为四个变量分别打分（1-10分），得分最低的就是制约因素。
审核组成要素——六个组成部分中哪个缺失或薄弱？
选择一个变量进行本次优化——不要全盘重建。通常得分最低的变量就是影响最大的那个。
起草修改后的部分——新的福利、新的保障、新的稀缺性、新名称、新支付方案
如实预测提升效果——大多数单一部分的修改能带来10%-40%的转化提升。任何承诺5倍提升的都是夸大其词。针对不同变量的两次连续优化可以叠加带来2-3倍的提升。

When NOT to Use Offer-Design Tactics

请勿使用的报价设计策略

Some offer patterns work but cost more than they're worth:

Manipulative scarcity — fake countdown timers, "only 3 spots left" lies. Short-term lift, long-term trust collapse. Don't.
Over-promising guarantees — "double your revenue or refund + $1,000." Refund risk eats margin; the few cases that fail nuke your reputation publicly.
Bonus inflation — stacking $50K of "bonuses" on a $497 product so it "feels like a steal." Sophisticated buyers see this. Treat bonuses as additive, not exaggerated.
Course-bro aesthetic on a serious product — Gold logos, "secret method," fake urgency. Pattern-matches to scam. Wrong room.

The repo voice: opinionated, but honest. Building offers well doesn't mean building offers loud.

有些报价模式看似有效，但代价高于收益：

操纵性稀缺性——虚假倒计时器、仅剩3个名额的谎言。短期提升转化，长期破坏信任。请勿使用。
过度承诺的保障——“双倍你的收入，否则退款+1000美元”。退款风险会侵蚀利润；少数失败案例会公开损害你的声誉。
福利膨胀——在497美元的产品上叠加价值5万美元的“福利”，使其“看起来像捡便宜”。成熟的买家能识破这种套路。福利应作为补充，而非夸大。
在严肃产品上使用“课程贩子”风格——金色logo、“秘密方法”、虚假紧迫感。会被归类为骗局。场景不符。

仓库的风格：有主见，但诚实。打造优质报价方案并不意味着要制造噱头。

Banned Vocabulary

禁用词汇

When drafting offer language (sales pages, emails, headlines), avoid:

"Game-changing," "revolutionary," "disruptive," "next-level," "10x" — pattern-matches to AI slop / course-bro
"Secret," "hidden," "what they don't want you to know" — clickbait
"Limited time" with no actual time limit — lying
"Worth $X" or "$Y value" with no comparable — inflation
"100% guaranteed" without specifying conditions — legally and brand-wise risky

Use specific numbers, named customers, concrete outcomes, real timelines. Specificity beats superlatives.

在撰写报价相关文案（销售页、邮件、标题）时，请避免使用：

“game-changing”“revolutionary”“disruptive”“next-level”“10x”——会被识别为AI生成内容/课程贩子风格
“secret”“hidden”“what they don't want you to know”——标题党
没有实际时间限制的“Limited time”——谎言
没有可比参照的“Worth $X”或“$Y value”——价值注水
未明确条件的“100% guaranteed”——存在法律和品牌风险

请使用具体数字、知名客户、具体成果、真实时间线。具体性胜过夸张的形容词。

offers

Original

Translation

Offer Design

Offer Design

Before Starting

开始之前

Core Philosophy

核心理念

When this skill matters

本技能的适用场景

When
`pricing`
does more of the work

更适合使用
`pricing`
技能的场景

The Value Equation

价值公式

The Anatomy of a Complete Offer

完整报价方案的组成要素

Reference Library

参考库

The Diagnostic Loop

诊断流程

When NOT to Use Offer-Design Tactics

请勿使用的报价设计策略

Banned Vocabulary

禁用词汇

Related Skills

相关技能

offers

Original

Translation

Offer Design

Offer Design

Before Starting

开始之前

Core Philosophy

核心理念

When this skill matters

本技能的适用场景

When pricing does more of the work

更适合使用pricing技能的场景

The Value Equation

价值公式

The Anatomy of a Complete Offer

完整报价方案的组成要素

Reference Library

参考库

The Diagnostic Loop

诊断流程

When NOT to Use Offer-Design Tactics

请勿使用的报价设计策略

Banned Vocabulary

禁用词汇

Related Skills

相关技能

When
`pricing`
does more of the work

更适合使用
`pricing`
技能的场景