SOCRATIC METHOD
═══════════════

1. THESIS
   └── Interlocutor claims to know X

2. QUESTIONING
   └── Socrates elicits additional beliefs B₁, B₂, B₃...

3. CONTRADICTION
   └── Shows: B₁ + B₂ + B₃ → ¬X

4. APORIA
   └── Puzzlement: which belief to abandon?

5. ITERATION
   └── New thesis, repeat process

GOALS:
├── Expose false belief
├── Test consistency
├── Clear path for genuine knowledge
└── Intellectual humility

SOCRATIC PROTOCOL
═════════════════

1. ASK FOR DEFINITION
   "What is X?"

2. TEST WITH EXAMPLES
   "Is this case an X?"
   "What about this case?"

3. SEEK COUNTEREXAMPLES
   "Can something be X without Y?"
   "Can something have Y without being X?"

4. PROBE IMPLICATIONS
   "If X is Y, then wouldn't Z follow?"
   "Is that acceptable?"

5. REFINE OR ABANDON
   "Should we revise our definition?"
   "Or acknowledge we don't know?"

HEGELIAN DIALECTIC
══════════════════

THESIS (Immediate)
├── Initial position
├── One-sided, abstract
├── Contains seeds of its negation
│
▼
ANTITHESIS (Negation)
├── Opposite, negating position
├── Also one-sided
├── In tension with thesis
│
▼
SYNTHESIS (Negation of Negation)
├── Aufhebung: Cancel, preserve, elevate
├── Contains truth of both
├── Becomes new thesis...

DIALECTICAL EXAMPLES
════════════════════

MASTER-SLAVE DIALECTIC
├── Thesis: Master's consciousness (recognized)
├── Antithesis: Slave's consciousness (unrecognized)
├── Process: Slave works, transforms world
├── Synthesis: Slave achieves self-consciousness through labor
└── Reversal: Slave surpasses master

SENSE-CERTAINTY TO PERCEPTION
├── Thesis: Immediate knowledge of "this here now"
├── Antithesis: Particular vanishes, universal emerges
├── Synthesis: Perception (universal in particular)
└── Progress toward absolute knowing

ABSTRACT RIGHT TO MORALITY TO ETHICAL LIFE
├── Thesis: Abstract individual rights
├── Antithesis: Inner conscience, morality
├── Synthesis: Sittlichkeit (ethical life in family, society, state)
└── Concrete freedom

HEGELIAN PROTOCOL
═════════════════

1. IDENTIFY ONE-SIDEDNESS
   What does this position EXCLUDE?
   What opposite does it PRESUPPOSE?

2. DEVELOP THE OPPOSITE
   What is the negation?
   Why is the negation equally one-sided?

3. FIND THE SYNTHESIS
   What higher unity preserves both?
   How does it resolve the tension?
   What new contradictions does it generate?

4. ITERATE
   Synthesis becomes new thesis
   Continue until stable (if ever)

MARXIST DIALECTIC
═════════════════

BASE (Economic relations)
├── Mode of production
├── Relations of production
├── Class structure
│
SUPERSTRUCTURE (Ideas, culture)
├── Ideology
├── Law, politics
├── Religion, philosophy
│
CONTRADICTION
├── Forces of production vs. relations of production
├── Class struggle as motor of history
├── Revolutionary transformation
│
HISTORICAL STAGES
├── Primitive communism
├── Slave society
├── Feudalism
├── Capitalism
├── Socialism → Communism

CONTRADICTION DETECTION
═══════════════════════

INTERNAL CONTRADICTION
├── Position undermines itself
├── Example: "All claims are relative" (self-refuting)
└── Look for: Self-reference, performative issues

EXTERNAL CONTRADICTION
├── Position conflicts with others held
├── Example: Free market + welfare state
└── Look for: Tensions between commitments

DEVELOPMENTAL CONTRADICTION
├── Position generates its opposite over time
├── Example: Freedom → alienation → new freedom
└── Look for: Historical tendencies

undefined

---