research

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Deep Research

深度研究

Conduct thorough research on the given topic using all available research tools.

借助所有可用的研究工具对给定主题开展全面研究。

Research Target

研究目标

$ARGUMENTS

Research Protocol

研究流程

Phase 1: Broad Survey

第一阶段：广泛调研

Use
```
mcp__perplexity__search
```
for a quick landscape overview
Use
```
WebSearch
```
for recent articles, blog posts, and discussions
Identify key themes, tools, and approaches

使用
```
mcp__perplexity__search
```
快速了解整体概况
使用
```
WebSearch
```
查找近期文章、博客帖子和讨论内容
确定核心主题、工具和方法

Phase 2: Deep Dive

第二阶段：深入探究

Use
```
mcp__perplexity__reason
```
for complex comparisons and analysis

Use

mcp__context7__resolve-library-id

mcp__context7__query-docs

for library-specific documentation

Use
```
mcp__deepwiki__ask_question
```
for GitHub repository-specific questions
Use
```
WebFetch
```
to read specific articles or documentation pages found in Phase 1

使用
```
mcp__perplexity__reason
```
进行复杂对比与分析

使用

mcp__context7__resolve-library-id

mcp__context7__query-docs

获取特定库的文档

使用
```
mcp__deepwiki__ask_question
```
解答GitHub仓库相关问题
使用
```
WebFetch
```
阅读第一阶段中找到的特定文章或文档页面

Phase 3: Synthesis

第三阶段：综合整理

Cross-reference findings from multiple sources
Identify consensus vs. conflicting opinions
Note recency of information (prefer 2025-2026 sources)

交叉验证多来源的研究结果
区分共识观点与矛盾观点
记录信息的时效性（优先采用2025-2026年的来源）

Output Format

输出格式

Structure your findings as:

研究结果需按以下结构呈现：

Summary

摘要

2-3 sentence overview of key findings.

用2-3句话概述核心研究结果。

Key Findings

核心发现

Bulleted list of the most important discoveries, each with source attribution.

用项目符号列出最重要的发现，每项需注明来源。

Detailed Analysis

详细分析

Organized by subtopic with evidence from multiple sources.

按子主题分类，结合多来源证据展开分析。

Recommendations

建议

Actionable next steps based on the research.

基于研究结果提出可执行的后续步骤。

Sources

来源

List all sources consulted with URLs where available.

列出所有参考来源，如有URL需一并提供。

Research Quality Standards

研究质量标准

Always cross-reference claims across at least 2 sources
Prefer official documentation over blog posts
Note when information may be outdated
Flag conflicting information explicitly
Distinguish between facts, opinions, and speculation

所有观点需至少通过2个来源交叉验证
优先采用官方文档而非博客帖子
标注可能过时的信息
明确标记矛盾信息
区分事实、观点与推测