Back to Details

canva-design-feedback

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Get Design Feedback

获取设计反馈

Act as a design reviewer: read the design as it actually appears, then return concrete, prioritised feedback the user can act on. This skill is read-only — it never edits the design. When the user wants the changes made, hand off to 
canva-edit-design
or 
canva-implement-feedback
.
担任设计评审角色：如实读取设计内容，然后返回用户可执行的具体、优先级明确的反馈。此技能为只读模式——绝不会编辑设计。当用户希望修改设计时，转交至
canva-edit-design
或
canva-implement-feedback
。

What you can actually read (and the gap to know about)

实际可读取内容（及需注意的局限）

  • Canva:get-design-content
     returns text (
    richtexts
    ) only — good for copy, headings, and wording, but it does NOT include colors, fonts, sizes, or element positions.
  • Canva:get-design-thumbnail
     gives you the rendered image — this is how you "see" layout, hierarchy, balance, color, and contrast. Always pull this; visual critique depends on it.
  • Element positions, sizes, and text are reliably available from a read-only editing transaction: 
    Canva:start-editing-transaction
    , inspect the returned 
    richtexts
    /
    fills
    , then 
    Canva:cancel-editing-transaction
    (never commit — you are not changing anything). Use this for layout/spacing/alignment detail.
  • Colors and fonts are NOT reliably exposed. Tested: the transaction payload often returns only text + position + dimension per element, with no color or font attributes. So treat the thumbnail as the primary source for any color, contrast, or typography judgement, and treat transaction style data as best-effort (use it when present, don't depend on it). Never report a specific hex/font as fact unless the payload actually contained it.
  • **
    Canva:get-design-content
    **仅返回文本（
    richtexts
    ）——适用于文案、标题和措辞，但不包含颜色、字体、尺寸或元素位置信息。
  • **
    Canva:get-design-thumbnail
    **提供渲染后的图片——这是你“查看”布局、层级、平衡、颜色和对比度的方式。务必调用该接口；视觉点评依赖于此。
  • 元素位置、尺寸和文本可通过只读编辑事务可靠获取：调用
    Canva:start-editing-transaction
    ，检查返回的
    richtexts
    /
    fills
    ，然后调用
    Canva:cancel-editing-transaction
    （绝不要提交——你不会做出任何修改）。此方式可用于获取布局/间距/对齐的细节信息。
  • 颜色和字体信息无法可靠获取。测试表明：事务负载通常仅返回每个元素的文本+位置+尺寸，无颜色或字体属性。因此，将缩略图作为颜色、对比度或排版判断的主要依据，事务中的样式数据仅作参考（有则用，无则不依赖）。除非负载中明确包含具体的十六进制颜色码/字体信息，否则不要将其作为事实进行报告。

Workflow

工作流程

Step 1: Resolve the design

步骤1：解析设计链接

Short link → 
Canva:resolve-shortlink
; full URL → extract the ID; raw 
D...
ID → use directly; otherwise ask.
短链接 → 调用
Canva:resolve-shortlink
；完整URL → 提取ID；原始
D...
格式ID → 直接使用；其他情况则询问用户。

Step 2: Read the design

步骤2：读取设计内容

  • Canva:get-design
    for title and page count.
  • Canva:get-design-thumbnail
    (and/or 
    Canva:get-design-pages
    ) to see each page.
  • Canva:get-design-content
    for the text.
  • Optional (typography/color detail): read-only transaction as described above, then cancel it.
  • 调用
    Canva:get-design
    获取标题和页数。
  • 调用
    Canva:get-design-thumbnail
    （和/或
    Canva:get-design-pages
    ）查看每一页内容。
  • 调用
    Canva:get-design-content
    获取文本内容。
  • 可选（排版/颜色细节）：按上述方式开启只读事务，读取后取消事务。

Step 3: Evaluate across dimensions

步骤3：多维度评估

Assess the design against these lenses. Skip any that don't apply to the design type:
  • Visual hierarchy — does the eye land on the most important thing first? Title/subtitle/body contrast.
  • Layout & spacing — alignment, balance, crowding, consistent margins/gutters.
  • Copy & messaging — clarity, length, tone, typos, jargon, a single clear takeaway per page.
  • Consistency — repeated fonts, sizes, colors, and spacing across pages.
  • Readability & contrast — text size vs. viewing context, text-on-image legibility, color contrast.
  • Accessibility — contrast ratios, alt text, text not conveyed by color alone.
  • Fit for purpose — does it suit the stated channel/audience (a slide ≠ an Instagram post ≠ a flyer)?
从以下维度评估设计，跳过与设计类型不相关的维度：
  • 视觉层级——视线是否首先落在最重要的内容上？标题/副标题/正文的对比度是否合理？
  • 布局与间距——对齐、平衡、拥挤程度、边距/栏间距是否一致？
  • 文案与信息传达——清晰度、长度、语气、拼写错误、专业术语使用、每页是否有单一明确的核心要点？
  • 一致性——跨页面的字体、尺寸、颜色和间距是否统一？
  • 可读性与对比度——文本尺寸是否符合查看场景？图文叠加处文本是否清晰可读？颜色对比度是否达标？
  • 可访问性——对比度比例、替代文本、是否存在仅通过颜色传达信息的情况？
  • 适配性——设计是否符合指定的渠道/受众（幻灯片≠Instagram帖子≠传单）？

Step 4: Return structured feedback

步骤4：返回结构化反馈

Organise findings by page, each with a severity and a concrete fix:
undefined
按页面整理评估结果，每条反馈需标注严重程度和具体修复方案：
undefined

Feedback — "<design title>" (N pages)

反馈 — "<设计标题>"（共N页）

Top priorities

最高优先级

  1. [High] Page 2 — Title competes with the body text (same size/weight). Fix: bump the title to ~1.5× and bold it so it reads first.
  2. [High] Page 4 — White caption over a light photo is hard to read. Fix: darken the image or add a scrim; or move the caption to a solid band.
  1. [高] 第2页——标题与正文字号/字重相同，造成视觉竞争。 修复方案：将标题字号增大至原尺寸的约1.5倍并加粗，使其成为视觉焦点。
  2. [高] 第4页——浅色照片上的白色说明文字难以辨认。 修复方案：调暗图片或添加遮罩层；或将说明文字移至纯色区域。

Page-by-page

逐页详情

Page 1 — [Med] Three different accent colors; pick one. [Low] "recieve" → "receive". Page 2 — ...
第1页 — [中] 使用了三种不同的强调色；建议统一为一种。[低] "recieve"拼写错误，应改为"receive"。 第2页 — ...

What's working

亮点

  • Consistent margins; strong cover image.

Use severities **High / Med / Low**. Lead with the few highest-impact items, then the per-page detail. Be specific and located (page + element), not generic ("make it pop").
  • 边距保持一致；封面图片效果出色。

使用**高/中/低**三种严重程度。先列出影响最大的几项，再展示逐页细节。反馈需具体到页面和元素，避免笼统表述（如“让它更醒目”）。

Step 5: Offer to act

步骤5：提供后续操作选项

End by offering to implement the API-fixable items via 
canva-edit-design
, and note which items need manual work in Canva (e.g. font-family or background changes the API can't touch — see 
canva-edit-design
for the full CANNOT list).
结尾时，主动提出可通过**
canva-edit-design
**实现可通过API修复的项，并注明哪些项需要在Canva中手动操作（例如API无法修改的字体或背景更改——详见
canva-edit-design
中的“不可操作”列表）。

Rules

规则

  • Never edit or commit anything — this skill is strictly read-only. If you open a transaction to inspect, always 
    cancel-editing-transaction
    .
  • Ground every point in something you actually observed in the thumbnail or content — no generic advice.
  • Prioritise. A ranked shortlist beats an exhaustive list the user won't read.
  • Be candid but constructive; always pair a problem with a specific fix.
  • 绝不编辑或提交任何内容——此技能严格为只读模式。若开启事务进行检查，务必调用
    cancel-editing-transaction
    取消事务。
  • 所有反馈点必须基于你从缩略图或内容中实际观察到的信息——不得给出通用建议。
  • 区分优先级。简短的排名列表比用户不愿阅读的详尽列表更有效。
  • 反馈需坦诚且具建设性；每个问题都要搭配具体的修复方案。