Loading...
Loading...
Compare original and translation side by side
| Dimension | What it measures | Signs of weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Citation | Inbound references from quality sources | Few referring domains, low-authority linkers, no editorial links |
| Identity | Brand recognition and entity coherence | No branded search volume, no knowledge panel, inconsistent NAP |
| Trust | Legitimacy and manipulation absence | Spammy backlink profile, no HTTPS, thin content, manual actions |
| Eminence | Visibility and industry standing | Low organic traffic, no SERP features, no media mentions |
| 维度 | 衡量内容 | 薄弱信号 |
|---|---|---|
| 引用度 | 来自优质来源的入站引用 | 引荐域名少、链接来源站点权重低、无编辑类链接 |
| 辨识度 | 品牌认知度和实体一致性 | 无品牌搜索量、无知识面板、NAP(名称/地址/电话)信息不一致 |
| 可信度 | 合法性、无操纵行为 | 反向链接profile含垃圾内容、无HTTPS、薄内容、手动处罚 |
| 知名度 | 曝光度和行业地位 | 自然流量低、无SERP特征、无媒体提及 |
[topic] + "resources"[topic] + "useful links"[topic] + "tools"[topic] + "resources"[topic] + "useful links"[topic] + "tools"| Score | DR/DA Range | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | DR 70+ | Major publications, NYTimes, BBC |
| 4 | DR 50-69 | Industry publications, established blogs |
| 3 | DR 30-49 | Mid-tier blogs, growing companies |
| 2 | DR 15-29 | Small blogs, newer companies |
| 1 | DR <15 | New or thin sites |
| 得分 | DR/DA区间 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | DR 70+ | 主流出版物、纽约时报、BBC |
| 4 | DR 50-69 | 行业出版物、成熟博客 |
| 3 | DR 30-49 | 中等博客、成长型公司 |
| 2 | DR 15-29 | 小型博客、新成立公司 |
| 1 | DR <15 | 新站或者薄内容站点 |
| Score | Relevance Level |
|---|---|
| 5 | Exact match — same niche, same subtopic |
| 4 | Closely related — same industry, adjacent topic |
| 3 | Broadly related — same general field |
| 2 | Tangentially related |
| 1 | Unrelated |
| 得分 | 相关性等级 |
|---|---|
| 5 | 完全匹配——相同细分领域、相同子主题 |
| 4 | 高度相关——相同行业、相邻主题 |
| 3 | 大致相关——相同大领域 |
| 2 | 边缘相关 |
| 1 | 不相关 |
| Score | Monthly Traffic |
|---|---|
| 5 | 10,000+ |
| 4 | 1,000-9,999 |
| 3 | 100-999 |
| 2 | 10-99 |
| 1 | <10 |
| 得分 | 月流量 |
|---|---|
| 5 | 10,000+ |
| 4 | 1,000-9,999 |
| 3 | 100-999 |
| 2 | 10-99 |
| 1 | <10 |
| Score | Position |
|---|---|
| 5 | In-content, editorial mention |
| 4 | In-content, contextual resources section |
| 3 | Author bio or about section |
| 2 | Sidebar or dedicated links section |
| 1 | Footer, sitewide, or hidden |
| 得分 | 位置 |
|---|---|
| 5 | 内容内、编辑提及 |
| 4 | 内容内、上下文资源区 |
| 3 | 作者简介或者关于页面 |
| 2 | 侧边栏或者专门的链接区 |
| 1 | 页脚、全站链接、隐藏链接 |
| Score | Anchor Type |
|---|---|
| 5 | Descriptive, natural language |
| 4 | Partial keyword match, natural |
| 3 | Brand name |
| 2 | Naked URL |
| 1 | Generic ("click here", "read more") |
| 得分 | 锚文本类型 |
|---|---|
| 5 | 描述性自然语言 |
| 4 | 部分关键词匹配、自然 |
| 3 | 品牌名 |
| 2 | 裸URL |
| 1 | 通用文本("点击这里"、"阅读更多") |
| Score | Status |
|---|---|
| 5 | Dofollow, editorial |
| 4 | Dofollow, non-editorial |
| 3 | Sponsored (rel="sponsored") |
| 2 | UGC (rel="ugc") |
| 1 | Nofollow |
| 得分 | 状态 |
|---|---|
| 5 | Dofollow、编辑链接 |
| 4 | Dofollow、非编辑链接 |
| 3 | 赞助(rel="sponsored") |
| 2 | UGC(rel="ugc") |
| 1 | Nofollow |
LQS = (Authority x 0.25) + (Relevance x 0.25) + (Traffic x 0.15)
+ (Position x 0.15) + (Anchor x 0.10) + (Follow x 0.10)| LQS Range | Rating | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0-5.0 | Premium link | High priority — pursue aggressively |
| 2.5-3.9 | Acceptable link | Worth pursuing if outreach effort is low |
| 1.0-2.4 | Low quality | Skip — or review for risk if it's an existing backlink |
LQS = (Authority x 0.25) + (Relevance x 0.25) + (Traffic x 0.15)
+ (Position x 0.15) + (Anchor x 0.10) + (Follow x 0.10)| LQS区间 | 评级 | 操作建议 |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0-5.0 | 优质链接 | 高优先级——全力争取 |
| 2.5-3.9 | 合格链接 | 如果外展成本低值得争取 |
| 1.0-2.4 | 低质量链接 | 跳过——如果是现有反向链接则评估风险 |
| Metric | Healthy | Warning | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dofollow ratio | 60-80% | >90% | >95% |
| Exact match anchor % | <15% | 15-25% | >25% |
| Brand anchor % | 25-45% | <15% | <5% |
| Toxic link % | <5% | 5-10% | >10% |
| Average linking DR | 25+ | 15-25 | <15 |
| 指标 | 健康 | 警告 | 危险 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dofollow占比 | 60-80% | >90% | >95% |
| 精确匹配锚文本占比 | <15% | 15-25% | >25% |
| 品牌锚文本占比 | 25-45% | <15% | <5% |
| Toxic链接占比 | <5% | 5-10% | >10% |
| 链接来源平均DR | 25+ | 15-25 | <15 |
| Prospect | URL | Score | Strategy | Status | Date Sent | Response | Link Live? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | 8/10 | Guest post | Pitched | [date] | Interested | Pending |
| ... | ... | 7/10 | Broken link | Sent | [date] | No reply | — |
| 潜在合作方 | URL | 得分 | 策略 | 状态 | 发送日期 | 回复 | 链接是否生效? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | 8/10 | 客座发文 | 已投稿 | [日期] | 感兴趣 | 待确认 |
| ... | ... | 7/10 | 死链建设 | 已发送 | [日期] | 无回复 | — |
| Prospect | Score | Strategy | Contact | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Pro Tip: Use the free Domain Authority Checker to assess your current authority baseline and prospect domains. SEOJuice MCP users can runto see which domains link to you, identify lost links worth recovering, and assess link quality —/seojuice:backlink-auditfinds recently lost backlinks for broken link building.list_backlinks
| 潜在合作方 | 得分 | 策略 | 联系方式 | 备注 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
专业提示: 使用免费的Domain Authority Checker 评估你当前的权重基线和潜在合作方域名。SEOJuice MCP用户可以运行查看哪些域名链接到你的站点,识别值得恢复的丢失链接,评估链接质量——/seojuice:backlink-audit可以找到近期丢失的反向链接用于死链建设。list_backlinks