newsletter-creation-curation
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseNewsletter Creation & Curation Skill
新闻通讯创建与策划Skill
Use this skill to create B2B newsletters that match business context, not generic content templates.
Deep strategic guidance is in .
Use this file as the executable operating manual.
PLAYBOOK.md使用该Skill创建贴合业务场景的B2B新闻通讯,而非通用内容模板。
深度战略指引请查看。
请将此文件作为可执行操作手册使用。
PLAYBOOK.mdMode
Mode
Detect from context or ask: "Outline only, full edition, or full edition + calendar?"
| Mode | What you get | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Edition outline + 3 lead story angles, no writing | Planning, editorial direction |
| Full newsletter edition, all sections written | Publishing this week |
| Full edition + 4-week content calendar + audience segmentation recommendations | Launching or systematizing a newsletter |
Default: — use if they're still deciding what to write. Use if they're building a newsletter from scratch or scaling.
standardquickdeep根据上下文判断或询问:"仅大纲、完整刊期,还是完整刊期+日历?"
| Mode | 输出内容 | 适用场景 |
|---|---|---|
| 刊期大纲 + 3个头条故事方向,不撰写内容 | 规划、编辑方向确定 |
| 完整新闻通讯刊期,所有版块已撰写完成 | 本周发布 |
| 完整刊期 + 4周内容日历 + 受众细分建议 | 启动或系统化新闻通讯项目 |
默认模式: — 若用户仍在确定写作内容,使用模式;若用户从零搭建或规模化新闻通讯,使用模式。
standardquickdeepContext Loading Gates
Context Loading Gates
Before generating any newsletter content, collect:
- Company context: What product/service? Who is the ICP?
- Newsletter goal: Lead gen / thought leadership / personal brand / category ownership
- Industry vertical: Sales Tech / HR Tech / Fintech / Operations Tech
- Company stage: Series A / Series B / Series C+
- Role: Founder / VP-Director / PMM-Content / Enterprise employee
- Geography: US-first / India-first
- Prior issues: Any existing issues to maintain consistency and voice?
- Approval constraints: Does this need legal/brand/manager review?
Structured intake — answer all 5 dimensions before proceeding:
Goal: [lead_gen | thought_leadership | personal_brand | category_ownership]
Industry: [sales_tech | hr_tech | fintech | ops_tech]
Stage: [series_a | series_b | series_c_plus]
Role: [founder | vp_director | pmm_content | enterprise_employee]
Geography: [us_first | india_first]生成任何新闻通讯内容前,请收集以下信息:
- 企业背景: 提供何种产品/服务?理想客户画像(ICP)是谁?
- 新闻通讯目标: 获客(Lead gen)/ 思想领导力打造 / 个人品牌建设 / 品类主导权抢占
- 行业垂直领域: Sales Tech / HR Tech / Fintech / Operations Tech
- 企业阶段: Series A / Series B / Series C+
- 角色: Founder / VP-Director / PMM-Content / 企业员工
- 地域侧重: US-first / India-first
- 过往刊期: 是否有已发布的刊期以保持内容一致性和风格?
- 审批限制: 是否需要法务/品牌/经理审核?
结构化信息收集 — 完成以下5个维度的回答后再继续:
Goal: [lead_gen | thought_leadership | personal_brand | category_ownership]
Industry: [sales_tech | hr_tech | fintech | ops_tech]
Stage: [series_a | series_b | series_c_plus]
Role: [founder | vp_director | pmm_content | enterprise_employee]
Geography: [us_first | india_first]Phase 1: Context Analysis
Phase 1:背景分析
Before drafting, reason through:
- Template match: Which industry template best fits? (Sales Tech = data-heavy; HR Tech = research-led; Fintech = compliance-aware; Ops Tech = practical)
- Cadence match: Series A = weekly/bi-weekly for simplicity; Series B = weekly with process; Series C+ = media-grade weekly with pillars
- Role constraints: Founder = direct POV allowed; Employee = approval checkpoint required before final draft
- Geography adjustments: India-first = IST timing + local examples; US-first = EST/PST + US benchmarks
- Goal-content alignment: Lead gen needs a clear conversion CTA; thought leadership needs original insight, not general content
Output one-line strategy statement:
For [ICP], we publish [cadence] to achieve [goal] with [format].
开始撰写前,请梳理以下内容:
- 模板匹配: 哪种行业模板最适配?(Sales Tech = 重数据;HR Tech = 研究导向;Fintech = 合规优先;Ops Tech = 实用导向)
- 发布频次匹配: Series A阶段 = 每周/双周,保持简洁;Series B阶段 = 每周发布,具备流程化内容;Series C+阶段 = 媒体级每周发布,拥有固定栏目
- 角色限制: Founder = 可使用直接观点;员工 = 终稿前需经过审批节点
- 地域调整: India-first = 采用IST时区 + 本地案例;US-first = 采用EST/PST时区 + 美国行业基准
- 目标-内容对齐: 获客目标需要明确的转化CTA;思想领导力打造需要原创见解,而非通用内容
输出一句话战略声明:
For [ICP], we publish [cadence] to achieve [goal] with [format].
Phase 2: Issue Blueprint
Phase 2:刊期蓝图
Before writing full draft, produce an issue blueprint:
markdown
undefined撰写完整草稿前,请生成刊期蓝图:
markdown
undefinedIssue Blueprint
Issue Blueprint
Strategy: For [ICP], [cadence] to achieve [goal].
Industry tone: [tactical/research-led/compliance-aware/practical]
Approval required: [yes/no — who]
Sections:
- Subject lines (3 options) — [~words each]
- Hook — [target ~75 words]
- Core insight — [target ~200 words]
- Actionable playbook — [target ~150 words, 3-5 steps]
- CTA — [1 sentence, singular action]
Get confirmation or proceed to draft.
---Strategy: For [ICP], [cadence] to achieve [goal].
Industry tone: [tactical/research-led/compliance-aware/practical]
Approval required: [yes/no — who]
Sections:
- Subject lines (3 options) — [~words each]
- Hook — [target ~75 words]
- Core insight — [target ~200 words]
- Actionable playbook — [target ~150 words, 3-5 steps]
- CTA — [1 sentence, singular action]
获得确认后再开始撰写草稿。
---Phase 3: Full Issue Draft
Phase 3:完整刊期草稿
Generate complete publish-ready draft. Required structure — every issue:
生成可直接发布的完整草稿。每期必须包含以下结构:
Subject Line Options (3 required)
主题选项(需提供3个)
Produce 3 distinct angles:
- A: Curiosity/open loop ("The metric most [ICP] ignore")
- B: Specific + benefit ("How [Company type] achieves [X] in [timeframe]")
- C: Contrarian/bold ("Stop [common behavior]. Do this instead.")
提供3种不同角度:
- A: 好奇心/开放式("The metric most [ICP] ignore")
- B: 具体+利益导向("How [Company type] achieves [X] in [timeframe]")
- C: 反常识/大胆式("Stop [common behavior]. Do this instead.")
Hook
开篇钩子
- First 2 sentences must earn the read
- Lead with the problem + stakes
- Target: busy reader can extract the point in 60 seconds
- 前两句话必须抓住读者注意力
- 以问题+影响开篇
- 目标:忙碌的读者能在60秒内get核心要点
Core Insight
核心见解
- One primary takeaway per issue — not three
- Support with: data, framework, or named pattern
- Include specific numbers or named examples wherever possible
- 每期仅一个核心结论,而非三个
- 需辅以:数据、框架或知名模式
- 尽可能包含具体数字或知名案例
Actionable Playbook
可执行操作指南
- 3-5 steps or checklist items
- Each step must be implementable, not just conceptual
- Series A = simpler steps; Series C+ = more sophisticated process
- 3-5个步骤或清单项
- 每个步骤必须可落地,而非仅停留在概念层面
- Series A阶段 = 步骤更简单;Series C+阶段 = 流程更复杂精细
CTA
CTA(行动号召)
- ONE measurable action only
- Options: reply with [X], click [link], share [asset], book [demo]
- Never use vague CTAs ("Learn more")
- 仅包含一个可衡量的行动
- 可选行动:回复[X]、点击[链接]、分享[资产]、预约[演示]
- 切勿使用模糊的CTA(如“了解更多”)
Phase 4: Refinement Checklist
Phase 4:优化检查清单
Run before delivering:
- : Can a busy reader extract value in 60 seconds?
Clarity - : Does each section include concrete guidance or evidence?
Specificity - : Does tone match industry and role constraints?
Relevance - : For fintech/employee-led, is a legal/manager review step included?
Compliance - : Does voice align with prior issues (if any were provided)?
Consistency - : Is there exactly ONE measurable CTA — not two, not zero?
CTA
交付前需完成以下检查:
- : 忙碌的读者能否在60秒内获取价值?
Clarity - : 每个版块是否包含具体指导或证据?
Specificity - : 风格是否符合行业和角色限制?
Relevance - : 针对Fintech/员工主导的内容,是否包含法务/经理审核步骤?
Compliance - : 风格是否与过往刊期(如有)保持一致?
Consistency - : 是否仅包含一个可衡量的行动号召,不多不少?
CTA
Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)
Phase 5:自我审核环节(必填)
After completing the draft, evaluate:
- Does the subject line A option create genuine curiosity without being clickbait?
- Does the hook deliver a problem + stakes in the first 2 sentences?
- Is the core insight something subscribers couldn't get from a generic AI prompt?
- Does the playbook have steps that are specific to this audience, not generic "tips"?
- Is the CTA actually measurable — i.e., can they track whether it worked?
- For fintech/employee contexts: is there an explicit approval checkpoint?
Flag any issue: "The playbook steps are too generic for a Series B SaaS audience — they read as beginner content. Revised to assume existing process maturity."
完成草稿后,需评估以下内容:
- 主题选项A是否能真正引发好奇心,而非标题党?
- 开篇钩子是否在前两句话中呈现了问题+影响?
- 核心见解是否是订阅者无法通过通用AI提示词获得的内容?
- 操作指南的步骤是否针对该受众定制,而非通用“小贴士”?
- CTA是否真正可衡量——即能否追踪其效果?
- 针对Fintech/员工场景:是否包含明确的审批节点?
标记任何问题:"The playbook steps are too generic for a Series B SaaS audience — they read as beginner content. Revised to assume existing process maturity."
Iteration Protocol
迭代流程
After delivering the draft:
- Ask: "Does the hook earn the read? Does the playbook feel actionable for your audience?"
- If hook is weak → rewrite using a different angle (data-led, story-led, or contrarian)
- If playbook is too generic → ask for a specific example from their own experience to ground it
- For next issue: "Want me to save these content themes so the next issue builds on this one?"
交付草稿后:
- 询问:"开篇钩子是否能抓住读者注意力?操作指南对您的受众来说是否具备可执行性?"
- 若钩子吸引力不足 → 改用其他角度重写(数据导向、故事导向或反常识)
- 若操作指南过于通用 → 请用户提供自身经历中的具体案例,以内容更贴合实际
- 针对下一期:"需要我保存这些内容主题,以便下一期在此基础上拓展吗?"
Output Structure
输出结构
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefinedNewsletter Issue: [Name] — Issue #[X] — [Date]
Newsletter Issue: [Name] — Issue #[X] — [Date]
Strategy: For [ICP], [cadence] to achieve [goal].
Strategy: For [ICP], [cadence] to achieve [goal].
Subject Line Options
Subject Line Options
A) [Curiosity/open loop]
B) [Specific + benefit]
C) [Contrarian/bold] Recommended: [A/B/C] — [reason]
C) [Contrarian/bold] Recommended: [A/B/C] — [reason]
A) [Curiosity/open loop]
B) [Specific + benefit]
C) [Contrarian/bold] Recommended: [A/B/C] — [reason]
C) [Contrarian/bold] Recommended: [A/B/C] — [reason]
Hook
Hook
[2-3 sentences — problem + stakes]
[2-3 sentences — problem + stakes]
Core Insight
Core Insight
[200-300 words — data, framework, or named pattern]
[200-300 words — data, framework, or named pattern]
Actionable Playbook
Actionable Playbook
- [Step]
- [Step]
- [Step]
- [Step]
- [Step]
- [Step]
CTA
CTA
[Single measurable action]
[Single measurable action]
Distribution Plan
Distribution Plan
- Send time: [Day, Time, Timezone]
- LinkedIn amplification: [Post angle / hook]
- Secondary channel: [Platform + angle]
- Send time: [Day, Time, Timezone]
- LinkedIn amplification: [Post angle / hook]
- Secondary channel: [Platform + angle]
KPI Targets
KPI Targets
- Open rate goal: [%]
- CTR goal: [%]
- Primary metric: [SQLs / subscribers / replies]
- Open rate goal: [%]
- CTR goal: [%]
- Primary metric: [SQLs / subscribers / replies]
Approval Required
Approval Required
[Yes — [who] | No]
[Yes — [who] | No]
Self-Critique Notes
Self-Critique Notes
[Issues flagged + revisions made]
---[Issues flagged + revisions made]
---Playbook Map (Deep Dives in PLAYBOOK.md
)
PLAYBOOK.md操作手册地图(深度内容请查看PLAYBOOK.md
)
PLAYBOOK.md- Sales Tech strategy:
SECTION A - HR Tech strategy:
SECTION B - Fintech strategy:
SECTION C - Operations Tech strategy:
SECTION D - Role approvals and geography tactics:
CROSS-CUTTING: UNIVERSAL FRAMEWORKS
Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com
- Sales Tech策略:
SECTION A - HR Tech策略:
SECTION B - Fintech策略:
SECTION C - Operations Tech策略:
SECTION D - 角色审批与地域策略:
CROSS-CUTTING: UNIVERSAL FRAMEWORKS
Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com