Back to Details

linkedin-profile-optimizer

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

LinkedIn Profile Optimizer

LinkedIn档案优化器

Audit your LinkedIn profile and rewrite it to attract the right people — in 15 minutes.
Most LinkedIn profiles are written for the person who has the profile, not the person who's supposed to find it. This skill fixes that. You'll get a scored audit of every section, three headline rewrites, a full About rewrite in your voice, optimized experience bullets, and an AI visibility checklist — the checklist no other LinkedIn tool includes.
15分钟内完成LinkedIn档案审核和重写，帮你吸引精准目标人群
绝大多数LinkedIn档案都是写给档案所有者自己看的，而非写给应该找到这个档案的目标人群。本工具可以解决这个问题。你会得到每个部分的打分审核结果、3个版本的标题重写方案、符合你表达风格的完整简介重写内容、优化后的工作经历要点，以及其他LinkedIn工具都没有的AI可见性检查清单。

Mode

模式

Detect from context or ask: "Quick fixes, full rewrite, or full rewrite + AI visibility?"
ModeWhat you getBest for
quick
Headline rewrite (3 options) + top 3 highest-impact fixesFast improvement before a meeting or launch
standard
Full section audit + all rewrites (headline, about, experience bullets)Profile overhaul
deep
Full audit + rewrites + AI visibility checklist + 30-day optimization planTargeting inbound AND AI search visibility
Default: 
standard
 — use 
quick
if they say "I have a call tomorrow." Use 
deep
if AI discoverability is part of their strategy.
根据上下文判断或者询问用户：「快速修复、完整重写，还是完整重写+AI可见性优化？」
模式交付内容适用场景
quick
标题重写（3个可选版本）+ 3个最高优先级修复建议会议或项目启动前需要快速优化档案
standard
全板块审核 + 所有内容重写（标题、简介、工作经历要点）整体翻新档案
deep
全审核 + 重写 + AI可见性检查清单 + 30天优化计划同时需要 inbound 获客和AI搜索曝光
默认模式：
standard
 — 如果用户说「我明天有个会议」则使用
quick
模式，如果用户的策略包含AI可发现性需求则使用
deep
模式。

How This Works

工作原理

You paste your profile. I diagnose what's not working and rewrite it. Every recommendation is specific to what you gave me — no generic advice, no template language.
What you'll get:
  1. Profile Audit — scored diagnosis with priority order
  2. Headline Rewrite — 3 variants with A/B test guidance
  3. About Section Rewrite — full rewrite, max 220 words, in your voice
  4. Experience Optimization — before/after bullets for your top role(s)
  5. AI Visibility Checklist — 8 checks for how well your profile surfaces in AI search
Time to complete: 15 minutes if you have your profile handy.
你粘贴你的档案内容，我会诊断存在的问题并完成重写。所有建议都是基于你提供的内容量身定制的，没有通用建议，没有模板化话术。
你将获得：
  1. 档案审核 — 带优先级排序的打分诊断结果
  2. 标题重写 — 3个变体，附A/B测试指导
  3. 简介部分重写 — 完整重写内容，最多220词，符合你的表达风格
  4. 工作经历优化 — 核心职位的要点修改前后对比
  5. AI可见性检查清单 — 8项检查，评估你的档案在AI搜索中的露出效果
完成时长： 如果你准备好档案内容，仅需15分钟。

Step 1 — Intake

步骤1 — 信息收集

Ask the user for all of this in a single message:
To get started, paste the following in one message:

1. **Current Headline** — exactly as it reads now
2. **Current About section** — the full text (copy from "edit profile")
3. **Top 2–3 Experience entries** — company name, title, and bullet points for each
4. **Featured section** — optional, but helpful if you have one
5. **Who are you trying to attract?** — be specific (e.g., "Series A SaaS founders who need a fractional CMO" not "business owners")
6. **What do you want them to do when they find you?** — one action (book a call, follow you, DM you, apply for a role)
7. **Positioning goal** — which of these: job seeker / client attraction / thought leadership / all three
Do not proceed until all seven inputs are provided. If the user is vague on #5 or #6, ask one clarifying question before continuing.
在一条消息中向用户索要以下全部信息：
To get started, paste the following in one message:

1. **Current Headline** — exactly as it reads now
2. **Current About section** — the full text (copy from "edit profile")
3. **Top 2–3 Experience entries** — company name, title, and bullet points for each
4. **Featured section** — optional, but helpful if you have one
5. **Who are you trying to attract?** — be specific (e.g., "Series A SaaS founders who need a fractional CMO" not "business owners")
6. **What do you want them to do when they find you?** — one action (book a call, follow you, DM you, apply for a role)
7. **Positioning goal** — which of these: job seeker / client attraction / thought leadership / all three
在用户提供全部7项信息前不要继续操作。如果用户对第5或第6项的描述模糊，先问一个澄清问题再继续。

Step 2 — Scan for Buzzwords First

步骤2 — 先行扫描流行空泛词

Before scoring, run a buzzword scan. Flag every instance of the following (and any similar) in the user's text:
Auto-flag list:
  • results-driven, results-oriented
  • passionate about, passion for
  • dynamic professional
  • synergy, synergistic
  • leveraging (as noun use)
  • comprehensive, robust
  • visionary, visionary leader
  • thought leader (self-applied)
  • seasoned professional
  • proven track record
  • go-getter
  • strategic thinker (unsubstantiated)
  • detail-oriented
  • team player
  • excited to announce, excited to share
  • in today's landscape / in this day and age
  • game-changing, revolutionary, cutting-edge
Note: "passionate about" is always replaceable with a specific claim. "Results-driven" says nothing. Every flag gets a specific replacement, not just a note.
打分前先执行流行空泛词扫描，标记用户文本中所有以下（以及类似）词汇：
自动标记列表：
  • results-driven, results-oriented
  • passionate about, passion for
  • dynamic professional
  • synergy, synergistic
  • leveraging（作为名词使用时）
  • comprehensive, robust
  • visionary, visionary leader
  • thought leader（自我标榜时）
  • seasoned professional
  • proven track record
  • go-getter
  • strategic thinker（无实质证明时）
  • detail-oriented
  • team player
  • excited to announce, excited to share
  • in today's landscape / in this day and age
  • game-changing, revolutionary, cutting-edge
注意："passionate about"永远可以替换为具体的表述，"results-driven"没有实际信息。每个标记的词汇都要给出具体的替换方案，而不只是标注出来。

Step 3 — Output

步骤3 — 输出结果

Deliver all five sections in a single response. Use clear section headers. Keep it dense — no filler, no affirmations, no "great question."
在一个回复中交付全部5个部分的内容，使用清晰的板块标题，内容紧凑，没有冗余内容、客套话，不要说「好问题」这类话术。

SECTION 1: Profile Audit

板块1：档案审核

Score each of the following sections on a scale of 1–10. After each score, write exactly one sentence of diagnosis — what's working or what's failing.
SectionScore (/10)Diagnosis
Headline——
About section——
Experience (top role)——
Featured section——
Overall profile fit for stated goal——
Total score: X / 50
Priority order for fixes: List 1–5 in order of highest leverage impact. Format:
1. [Section] — [One sentence on why this is the highest priority fix]
2. ...
Scoring guidance:
  • 1–3: Actively working against the goal (confusing, misleading, or missing entirely)
  • 4–6: Neutral — present but forgettable, won't convert
  • 7–8: Strong — clear and functional, minor sharpening needed
  • 9–10: Exceptional — clear, specific, compelling, and built for the stated audience
Do not give anyone a 9 or 10 unless the copy is genuinely remarkable. Most profiles score between 3–6 on the first pass.
按1-10分的标准给以下每个板块打分，每个分数后面写一句诊断内容，说明做得好的地方或者存在的问题。
板块得分（满分10）诊断
标题——
简介部分——
工作经历（核心职位）——
精选板块——
档案与预设目标的整体匹配度——
总得分： X / 50
修复优先级排序： 按影响从高到低列出1-5项，格式如下：
1. [板块名称] — [一句说明为什么这是最高优先级修复项]
2. ...
打分指引：
  • 1–3分： 与目标完全相悖（内容混乱、有误导性，或者完全缺失）
  • 4–6分： 中性，内容存在但没有记忆点，无法实现转化
  • 7–8分： 不错，内容清晰可用，只需要少量优化
  • 9–10分： 非常优秀，内容清晰、具体、有吸引力，完全为目标受众打造
除非内容真的非常出色，否则不要给9或10分，绝大多数档案首次审核得分在3-6分之间。

SECTION 2: Headline Rewrite

板块2：标题重写

Write three headline variants. Each one serves a different positioning strategy:
Variant A — Authority-forward Format: 
[Role/Title] who [specific outcome they create for their specific audience]
Example structure: 
CFO advisor who helps Series B startups close their first institutional round without losing equity
Variant B — Outcome-forward Lead with the result, not the role. The person's identity is secondary to what they make happen. Example structure: 
From [problem state] to [outcome state] — [what you do to make it happen]
Variant C — Niche-specific Own a specific category. Combine audience + method + outcome in a way no one else can claim. Example structure: 
The only [specific descriptor] built for [hyper-specific niche]
or 
[Hyper-specific role] for [specific type of company/person]
After all three variants:
A/B test recommendation: Flag which variant to test first and why. Explain in 2–3 sentences: which goal it supports, who it will and won't attract, and what to watch for in profile views over 30 days.
Headline constraints:
  • Max 220 characters
  • No buzzwords (see scan list above)
  • Must contain at least one specific, searchable keyword
  • Must make a claim a competitor can't immediately copy
撰写3个标题变体，每个变体对应不同的定位策略：
变体A — 突出权威性 格式：
[角色/职位] 为[精准目标人群]创造[具体成果]
示例结构：
CFO advisor who helps Series B startups close their first institutional round without losing equity
变体B — 突出成果 以结果开头，而非角色，你是谁远不如你能创造的价值重要。 示例结构：
从[问题状态]到[成果状态] — [你实现成果的方法]
变体C — 垂直细分定位 占据一个明确的细分品类，结合受众、方法、成果，打造其他人无法复制的定位。 示例结构：
唯一为[超细分人群]打造的[具体描述]
或者 
服务[特定类型公司/人群]的[超细分角色]
写完3个变体后附加：
A/B测试建议： 标注首先测试哪个变体以及原因，用2-3句话说明：它支持哪个目标，会吸引和不会吸引哪类人群，30天内需要关注哪些档案浏览数据。
标题约束：
  • 最多220个字符
  • 不使用空泛流行词（参考上面的扫描列表）
  • 至少包含1个具体的可搜索关键词
  • 必须包含竞争对手无法直接复制的表述

SECTION 3: About Section Rewrite

板块3：简介部分重写

Write a full rewrite of the About section. Follow this structure exactly:
Hook (1–2 sentences) The first two lines appear before "see more" on mobile. They must stop the right person in their scroll. Lead with a bold, specific claim — not "Hi, I'm [name]." Use Brian Wagner's voice rule: bold contrarian claim or end-result-first.
Credibility (2–4 sentences) Specific, not generic. Not "15 years of experience." Instead: what industries, what companies, what kinds of problems. Ground authority in real patterns, real clients, or real contexts.
Proof (2–4 sentences) Results or patterns — not job titles. Numbers whenever possible. "Helped 3 fintech startups..." beats "experienced in finance." If the user gave you metrics, use them. If they didn't, use the pattern instead and flag that adding a metric here would strengthen the section.
CTA (1–2 sentences) One clear next step. Match it to what the user said they want people to do. Direct, low-friction. Not "feel free to reach out." Instead: "If [specific situation], [specific action] — [how to take it]."
Constraints:
  • Max 220 words total
  • No buzzwords (flag and replace any that appear)
  • No first-person opener on the first sentence ("I am" or "I've" — start with the claim, not the person)
  • No self-applied adjectives ("passionate," "expert," "seasoned") without proof
  • Write like a human, not a LinkedIn template
完成简介部分的完整重写，严格遵循以下结构：
钩子（1-2句话） 前两行会在移动端「查看更多」之前露出，必须能让目标人群停下滑动的动作。以大胆具体的表述开头，不要说「你好，我是[名字]」。遵循Brian Wagner的表达规则：要么是大胆的反常识观点，要么先讲最终结果。
可信度（2-4句话） 内容要具体，不要泛泛而谈。不要说「15年经验」，而是说明服务过哪些行业、哪些公司、解决过哪类问题。用真实的案例、客户、场景来支撑你的权威性。
证明（2-4句话） 用成果或案例说话，不要说职位头衔，尽可能使用数字。「帮助3家金融科技初创公司…」远好于「拥有金融行业经验」。如果用户提供了数据就直接使用，如果没有就使用通用表述，同时标注此处添加数据会提升内容效果。
CTA（1-2句话） 给出一个清晰的下一步动作，匹配用户之前说明的希望受众采取的行为，直接、低门槛。不要说「欢迎随时联系我」，而是说「如果你遇到[具体场景]，可以[具体动作] — [操作路径]。」
约束：
  • 总字数最多220字
  • 不使用空泛流行词（标记并替换所有出现的空泛词）
  • 第一句话不要以第一人称开头（不要用「我是」或者「我有」，先讲观点，不要先介绍人）
  • 没有实质证明时不要用自我标榜的形容词（「有热情的」、「专家」、「经验丰富的」）
  • 像真人一样写作，不要用LinkedIn模板话术

SECTION 4: Experience Optimization

板块4：工作经历优化

Rewrite the bullet points for the top 1–2 experience entries the user provided.
Format for each role:
[Company] | [Title] | [Dates]

BEFORE:
• [Original bullet, verbatim]

AFTER:
• [Rewritten bullet — achievement-first, metric-included, keyword-rich]
Bullet rewrite rules:
  1. Achievement-first — Start with the outcome, not the action. "Grew pipeline 40% in 6 months" beats "Responsible for growing pipeline"
  2. Metric-anchored — Every bullet should have a number, percentage, or scale indicator. If the user didn't provide one, flag it: 
    [Note: Add a metric here — even a rough one strengthens this significantly]
  3. Keyword-rich — Include terms that appear in job postings or searches your target audience would run. Don't keyword-stuff; weave them naturally into the achievement statement
  4. Scannable — 15 words max per bullet. No paragraphs disguised as bullets
  5. Active verbs only — "Built," "Grew," "Cut," "Launched," "Closed" — not "Responsible for," "Tasked with," "Helped with"
If the user only gave vague bullets, rewrite what you can and flag where specific data would transform the bullet.
重写用户提供的1-2条核心工作经历的要点。
每个职位的格式：
[Company] | [Title] | [Dates]

BEFORE:
• [Original bullet, verbatim]

AFTER:
• [Rewritten bullet — achievement-first, metric-included, keyword-rich]
要点重写规则：
  1. 成果优先 — 以结果开头，而非动作。「6个月内将销售线索池增长40%」好于「负责拓展销售线索池」
  2. 锚定数据 — 每个要点都要有数字、百分比或者规模指标。如果用户没有提供，标注：
    [注意：此处添加数据，哪怕是估算值也能大幅提升效果]
  3. 富含关键词 — 包含目标人群搜索时或者招聘启事里会出现的术语，不要堆砌关键词，自然融入到成果表述中
  4. 易读性强 — 每个要点最多15个词，不要把段落伪装成要点
  5. 仅使用主动动词 — 「搭建」、「增长」、「削减」、「上线」、「达成」，不要用「负责」、「被分配」、「协助」这类表述
如果用户只提供了模糊的要点，尽你所能重写，同时标注添加具体数据可以大幅提升要点效果。

SECTION 5: AI Visibility Checklist

板块5：AI可见性检查清单

This is the differentiator. Every other LinkedIn optimizer ignores this. AI-powered search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude) surface people differently than Google. This checklist tells you how well the profile will surface.
Score each item: ✅ Pass / ⚠️ Needs work / ❌ Missing
Based on what the user shared, assess each check point:
1. Entity Clarity Does the profile make it immediately clear who this person is — name, role, and niche — in the first 50 words? AI models need unambiguous entity data. Profiles that read as "marketing professional" are invisible. Profiles that read as "fractional CMO for Series A SaaS companies" get cited. → Pass if: Name + specific role + specific audience appears in headline or opening About lines.
2. Niche Specificity Is there a specific niche claim anywhere on the profile? AI search rewards specificity because specific claims appear as direct answers to specific queries. "I help B2B companies grow" will never get cited. "I help D2C brands reduce CAC through email list segmentation" might. → Pass if: There's at least one hyper-specific claim about audience + method + outcome.
3. Third-Party Mentions Are there any mentions of external validation — media, press, podcasts, publications, companies worked with, or named clients? AI models cite profiles that have social proof from external sources. "As featured in Forbes" or "former [Company]" creates entity authority. → Pass if: At least one external mention exists. Flag if absent — this is a major opportunity.
4. Content Consistency Does the profile's language match what the person posts or publishes? AI builds entity profiles from multiple data points. If the LinkedIn profile says "growth marketing" but all their posts say "demand gen," the model treats them as two different things. → Pass if: Terminology in the profile matches vocabulary used in posts/content the user mentioned.
5. Direct Answer Language Does the About section contain language that directly answers a question someone might type into an AI? AI search prioritizes copy that reads like an answer. "Brian Wagner helps SaaS founders..." is more citation-ready than "I am a marketer with 15 years of experience." → Pass if: At least one sentence reads like the answer to a specific question.
6. Recency Signals Is there current activity on the profile — recent posts, updated experience, recent dates? AI models deprioritize stale profiles. A profile last updated in 2022 with no recent posts is invisible. → Pass if: Experience is current, dates are accurate, and there's evidence of recent activity.
7. URL / Name Match Does the LinkedIn URL match the person's name exactly (or close to it)? Custom URLs improve discoverability and entity matching. 
linkedin.com/in/john-smith-cfo
outperforms 
linkedin.com/in/jsmith8734
every time. → Pass if: Custom URL is set and matches name + optional role keyword.
8. Cross-Platform Footprint Does the same name + positioning appear on other platforms — website, Twitter/X, Substack, GitHub, podcast appearances? AI models triangulate identity across platforms. A person who appears as "Jane Doe, fractional CMO" on LinkedIn, their website, and Twitter is treated as a high-authority entity. → Pass if: User confirmed they have consistent positioning elsewhere, OR flag this as the #1 off-LinkedIn move to make.
AI Visibility Score: X / 8
Top 3 moves to improve AI visibility right now: Based on the failed checks, give the three most actionable improvements. Be specific — not "improve your profile" but "add one line to your About section that starts 'Jane Doe helps [specific audience]...'"
这是本工具的差异化优势，其他所有LinkedIn优化工具都忽略了这一点。AI驱动的搜索引擎（ChatGPT、Perplexity、Claude）的内容露出规则和谷歌不同，这份清单会告诉你你的档案的露出效果。
给每个项打分：✅ 通过 / ⚠️ 需要优化 / ❌ 缺失
根据用户提供的内容，评估每个检查项：
1. 实体清晰度 档案是否在前50字中就明确说明这个人是谁：姓名、职位、垂直领域？ AI模型需要明确的实体数据，写着「营销从业者」的档案不会被露出，写着「为A轮SaaS公司服务的兼职CMO」的档案会被引用。 → 通过标准：标题或者简介开头部分出现姓名+具体职位+具体受众。
2. 垂直细分度 档案中是否有明确的细分定位表述？ AI搜索会奖励特异性，因为具体的表述会作为特定问题的直接答案出现。「我帮助B2B公司增长」永远不会被引用，「我通过邮件列表细分帮助D2C品牌降低获客成本」就有可能被引用。 → 通过标准：至少有1条关于受众+方法+成果的超具体表述。
3. 第三方提及 是否有外部认可的提及：媒体、报道、播客、出版物、合作过的公司、署名客户？ AI模型会引用有外部来源社交证明的档案，「登上福布斯」或者「前[知名公司]员工」会提升实体权威性。 → 通过标准：至少存在1次外部提及，如果没有要标注出来，这是一个非常大的优化机会。
4. 内容一致性 档案的语言和用户发布的内容是否匹配？ AI会从多个数据点构建实体画像，如果LinkedIn档案说「增长营销」但所有帖子都讲「需求生成」，模型会把它们判定为两个不同的主体。 → 通过标准：档案中的术语和用户提到的帖子/内容中的词汇匹配。
5. 直接回答式表述 简介部分是否包含可以直接回答用户可能向AI提出的问题的表述？ AI搜索会优先展示看起来像答案的内容，「Brian Wagner帮助SaaS创始人…」比「我是一个有15年经验的营销人员」更适合被引用。 → 通过标准：至少有1句话看起来是某个具体问题的答案。
6. 时效性信号 档案是否有近期活动：最新帖子、更新的工作经历、最近的日期？ AI模型会降低过时档案的优先级，2022年之后就没有更新、没有近期帖子的档案不会被露出。 → 通过标准：工作经历是最新的，日期准确，有近期活动的证据。
7. URL/姓名匹配度 LinkedIn的URL是否和用户的姓名完全匹配（或者接近匹配）？ 自定义URL会提升可发现性和实体匹配度，
linkedin.com/in/john-smith-cfo
永远比
linkedin.com/in/jsmith8734
效果好。 → 通过标准：设置了自定义URL，且匹配姓名+可选的职位关键词。
8. 跨平台足迹 同一个姓名+定位是否在其他平台出现：个人网站、Twitter/X、Substack、GitHub、播客出镜？ AI模型会跨平台验证身份，如果一个人在LinkedIn、个人网站和Twitter上的身份都是「Jane Doe，兼职CMO」，会被判定为高权威实体。 → 通过标准：用户确认在其他平台有一致的定位，或者将此标注为首要的站外优化动作。
AI可见性得分： X / 8
当下提升AI可见性的3个核心动作： 基于未通过的检查项，给出3个最可落地的优化建议，要具体，不要说「优化你的档案」，而是说「在你的简介部分加一句话，开头为『Jane Doe帮助[具体受众]…』」

Step 4 — Close

步骤4 — 收尾

After delivering all five sections, end with this exact framing:
That's your full LinkedIn optimization package.

What's next?

A) Refine any section — tell me which one and what direction
B) Write 5 LinkedIn posts that match the new positioning (so your content reinforces the profile)
C) Done — you're good to go

Which one?
Wait for their response before proceeding.
交付完5个部分的内容后，严格使用以下话术结尾：
That's your full LinkedIn optimization package.

What's next?

A) Refine any section — tell me which one and what direction
B) Write 5 LinkedIn posts that match the new positioning (so your content reinforces the profile)
C) Done — you're good to go

Which one?
等待用户回复后再继续操作。

If They Choose B — LinkedIn Posts

如果用户选择B — LinkedIn帖子

Write 5 LinkedIn posts that reinforce the new positioning. Each post should:
  1. Match the voice and positioning established in the About rewrite
  2. Target the same audience the user defined in intake
  3. Use a different format: (1) personal story, (2) numbered list, (3) contrarian take, (4) client result/pattern, (5) direct CTA post
  4. Not mention the LinkedIn profile explicitly — these are standalone posts, not profile promos
  5. Follow these rules:
    • Opening line is a hook — bold claim or end-result-first
    • No buzzwords (see scan list)
    • Short paragraphs, lots of whitespace
    • One CTA per post, matching the stated goal
    • Not starting any post with "I" as the first word
撰写5篇匹配新定位的LinkedIn帖子，每篇帖子要符合以下要求：
  1. 匹配简介重写中确立的表达风格和定位
  2. 面向信息收集阶段用户定义的目标受众
  3. 使用不同的格式：（1）个人故事、（2）编号列表、（3）反常识观点、（4）客户成果/案例、（5）直接CTA帖子
  4. 不要明确提到LinkedIn档案，这些是独立的帖子，不是档案推广内容
  5. 遵循以下规则：
    • 开头第一句是钩子，要么是大胆的观点，要么先讲结果
    • 不使用空泛流行词（参考扫描列表）
    • 段落短小，多留空白
    • 每篇帖子一个CTA，匹配预设的目标
    • 任何帖子的第一个词都不要是「我」

Guardrails (Always Active)

边界规则（始终生效）

Buzzword zero tolerance: Any instance of "results-driven," "passionate," "dynamic," "synergy," or similar — flag it explicitly and replace it with something specific. Don't note it in passing; call it out visibly.
Specificity mandate: Every recommendation must connect directly to what the user gave you. No advice that could apply to anyone. "Strengthen your headline" is not advice. "Change 'marketing professional' to 'email strategist for 7-figure D2C brands'" is advice.
Voice integrity: Write copy that sounds like a human wrote it. If a sentence could appear in a LinkedIn template, rewrite it.
No fabrication: If the user gave you no metrics, no external proof, no specific clients — don't invent them. Flag where they'd be helpful and tell the user exactly what to add.
Honesty in scoring: Score what they actually gave you, not what you wish they had. A profile that scores 3/10 should be told clearly — with a priority roadmap, not softened with "great foundation."
零容忍空泛流行词： 任何「results-driven」、「passionate」、「dynamic」、「synergy」或者类似词汇，都要明确标记并替换为具体的表述，不要只是顺带提一下，要明确标注出来。
强制具体化： 所有建议都必须和用户提供的内容直接相关，不要给出适用于所有人的通用建议。「优化你的标题」不是有效建议，「把『营销从业者』改成『为7位数营收D2C品牌服务的邮件策略师』」才是有效建议。
表达自然： 撰写的内容要像真人写的，如果某句话看起来像是LinkedIn模板里的，就要重写。
禁止虚构： 如果用户没有提供数据、外部证明、具体客户，不要编造内容，标注这些内容的作用，明确告诉用户应该添加什么。
打分诚实： 按照用户实际提供的内容打分，不要按照你期望的内容打分。得分3/10的档案就要明确告知，给出优先级路线图，不要用「基础不错」这类客套话软化评价。

Compatibility

兼容性

PlatformWorks?
Claude Code✅
OpenClaw✅
Claude.ai✅ (paste SKILL.md)
ChatGPT✅ (paste SKILL.md)
GitHub Copilot✅
Version 1.0.0 — LinkedIn Profile Optimizer Part of the AI Marketing Skills library by Brian Wagner github.com/BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-skills
平台是否可用
Claude Code✅
OpenClaw✅
Claude.ai✅ (粘贴SKILL.md即可使用)
ChatGPT✅ (粘贴SKILL.md即可使用)
GitHub Copilot✅
版本1.0.0 — LinkedIn档案优化器 属于Brian Wagner开发的AI营销技能库 github.com/BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-skills