nature-portfolio-playbook

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Nature Portfolio Playbook

Nature Portfolio投稿手册

Overview

概述

Use this skill when the venue decision itself is still live, or when a manuscript already targets
Nature
,
Nature Methods
, or
Nature Biotechnology
and needs venue-specific framing before a heavy revision pass.
This skill is about fit and policy. It does not replace
scientific-writing
,
manuscript-optimizer
, or
submission-audit
.
当期刊选择尚未确定,或者手稿已瞄准
Nature
Nature Methods
Nature Biotechnology
,且需要在大规模修订前进行期刊专属框架调整时,可使用本技能。
本技能聚焦于适配性与政策合规,不能替代
scientific-writing
manuscript-optimizer
submission-audit
工具。

When To Use

使用场景

Use this skill when:
  • the user asks whether a story fits
    Nature
    ,
    Nature Methods
    , or
    Nature Biotechnology
  • the paper has a
    Nature
    -style tone but the actual venue is undecided
  • the contribution could be framed as an
    Article
    ,
    Resource
    ,
    Analysis
    , or short-format methods report
  • a manuscript is close to submission and needs a Nature Portfolio-specific preflight
Do not use this skill when:
  • the task is generic sentence-level editing
  • the venue is a conference or a non-Nature journal
  • the manuscript structure itself is still unstable and needs
    manuscript-optimizer
    first
在以下场景中使用本技能:
  • 用户询问研究内容是否适合
    Nature
    Nature Methods
    Nature Biotechnology
  • 论文具备
    Nature
    风格基调,但尚未确定具体投稿期刊
  • 研究成果可被归类为
    Article
    Resource
    Analysis
    或短篇方法报告
  • 手稿接近投稿阶段,需要针对Nature Portfolio进行专属预检
请勿在以下场景使用本技能:
  • 仅需通用句子级编辑的任务
  • 投稿目标为会议或非Nature系列期刊
  • 手稿结构仍不稳定,需先使用
    manuscript-optimizer
    工具

Venue Routing

期刊选择指南

Flagship
Nature

旗舰刊
Nature

Default to
Nature
only when the paper makes a broad conceptual advance that matters outside the immediate specialty and can be explained to non-specialists without heavy field-specific scaffolding.
Use these framing defaults:
  • prioritize broad readership over specialist density
  • keep title and abstract low-jargon
  • preserve the non-specialist-friendly summary paragraph expectation
  • if fit is uncertain, explicitly test whether the broad-readership case is real before optimizing prose too far
仅当研究取得了超越特定领域的广泛概念性进展,且无需过多领域专属背景知识即可向非专业人士解释时,才优先考虑
Nature
遵循以下框架原则:
  • 优先覆盖广泛读者群体,而非仅聚焦专业人士
  • 标题与摘要尽量减少专业术语
  • 保留面向非专业读者的摘要总结段落
  • 若适配性存疑,在过度优化文字前,先明确验证其是否真正符合广泛读者群体的需求

Nature Methods

Nature Methods

Prefer
Nature Methods
when the central contribution is a method, assay, platform, computational approach, or resource whose main claim is enabling power.
Before calling a story
Nature Methods
-fit, check that the manuscript can support all of these:
  • a clear technical advance over available approaches
  • validation and benchmarking against credible baselines or alternatives
  • enough detail or protocol access for reproducibility
  • demonstrated general utility, not just one narrow showcase
  • a compelling biological or biomedical application that shows why the method matters
当核心贡献为方法、检测技术、平台、计算方法或资源,且主要价值在于赋能能力时,优先选择
Nature Methods
在判定研究适合
Nature Methods
之前,需确认手稿满足以下所有条件:
  • 相较于现有方法具备明确的技术突破
  • 针对可信基准或替代方案进行了验证与基准测试
  • 提供足够的细节或协议访问途径以确保可重复性
  • 证明具备通用实用性,而非仅适用于单一狭窄场景
  • 展示了具有说服力的生物或生物医学应用案例,以体现该方法的重要性

Nature Biotechnology

Nature Biotechnology

Prefer
Nature Biotechnology
when the paper's value is not just technical novelty but biotechnology significance: enabling capability, translational relevance, engineering depth, platform utility, or community-scale resource value.
Before calling a story
Nature Biotechnology
-fit, check that the manuscript can make legible:
  • why the advance matters for biotechnology or medicine, not just for one specialist benchmark
  • why the story is substantial enough for a full article rather than a narrower methods report
  • whether the paper is truly an
    Article
    or would be better framed as a
    Resource
当论文的价值不仅在于技术新颖性,更在于生物技术层面的意义:赋能能力、转化相关性、工程深度、平台实用性或社区级资源价值时,优先选择
Nature Biotechnology
在判定研究适合
Nature Biotechnology
之前,需确认手稿能够清晰呈现:
  • 该进展为何对生物技术或医学具有重要意义,而非仅在单一专业基准测试中表现优异
  • 研究内容足够充实,适合作为完整文章而非更狭窄的方法报告
  • 论文应归类为
    Article
    还是更适合作为
    Resource

Article-Type Check

文章类型检查

Do this early. Do not treat article type as formatting cleanup.
  • Article
    : full research story with multiple linked claims and a substantial evidence chain
  • Resource
    : community-useful dataset, platform, atlas, database, or screening asset whose lasting value is broad reuse
  • Analysis
    : integrative or comparative analytical study when the core contribution is the analytical insight rather than a new experimental method
  • short-format method/report categories: use only when the story is tighter, more self-contained, and the journal explicitly supports that format
If the manuscript keeps oscillating between
method paper
and
resource paper
, resolve that before rewriting the abstract or Results.
尽早进行此项检查,切勿将文章类型视为格式整理工作。
  • Article
    :包含多个关联研究结论和大量证据链的完整研究成果
  • Resource
    :对社区有用的数据集、平台、图谱、数据库或筛选资源,其长期价值在于广泛复用
  • Analysis
    :整合性或比较性分析研究,核心贡献为分析见解而非新实验方法
  • 短篇方法/报告类:仅适用于内容更紧凑、独立完整且期刊明确支持该格式的研究
若手稿在“方法论文”与“资源论文”之间摇摆不定,需先解决此问题,再重写摘要或结果部分。

Nature Portfolio Preflight

Nature Portfolio投稿预检

Run this before calling a draft submission-ready:
  1. Reporting standards
    • confirm whether a reporting summary will be required
    • make sure the manuscript and supplement already contain the information that summary will demand
  2. Data and code availability
    • check that repository names, accession IDs, download links, and access restrictions are ready to disclose
    • do not wait until after acceptance to figure out the data/code statement
  3. Protocol and reproducibility readiness
    • for methods papers, ensure the usable protocol path is clear: supplement, protocol repository, or public method record
  4. Image integrity and raw data
    • ensure unprocessed source images and raw blot/gel material can be produced if requested
    • remove any figure-preparation habit that could look like selective enhancement
  5. AI and attribution
    • disclose qualifying use of generative AI tools where the journal requires it
    • do not treat AI-made images or undisclosed AI-written content as safe by default
  6. Related-manuscript and preprint disclosures
    • disclose preprints, overlapping submissions, related manuscripts, and conference-proceedings history when relevant
在判定草稿可提交前,完成以下检查:
  1. 报告标准
    • 确认是否需要提交报告摘要
    • 确保手稿及补充材料已包含报告摘要所需的全部信息
  2. 数据与代码可用性
    • 确认已准备好披露存储库名称、登录ID、下载链接及访问限制
    • 切勿等到接收后再确定数据/代码声明
  3. 实验方案与可重复性准备
    • 对于方法类论文,确保可用的实验方案路径清晰:补充材料、方案存储库或公开方法记录
  4. 图像完整性与原始数据
    • 确保在被要求时可提供未处理的源图像及原始印迹/凝胶材料
    • 移除任何可能被视为选择性增强的图像处理习惯
  5. AI使用与署名
    • 在期刊要求的情况下,披露符合条件的生成式AI工具使用情况
    • 默认情况下,切勿认为AI生成的图像或未披露的AI撰写内容是安全的
  6. 相关手稿与预印本披露
    • 在相关情况下,披露预印本、重叠投稿、相关手稿及会议论文历史

Working Rule

工作流程规则

Use this decision order:
  1. choose audience and venue family
  2. choose article type
  3. check whether the evidence package matches the venue promise
  4. only then optimize framing and prose
遵循以下决策顺序:
  1. 确定受众与期刊类别
  2. 选择文章类型
  3. 检查证据材料是否符合期刊要求
  4. 最后再优化框架与文字

Official Source Pointers

官方参考来源

Keep these Nature Portfolio pages as the primary references:
  • Nature
    formatting guide
  • Nature
    editorial criteria and processes
  • Nature Methods
    aims, content, and editorial-policies pages
  • Nature Biotechnology
    aims, content, and editorial-policies pages
  • Nature Portfolio policies on reporting standards, image integrity, AI, and preprints/conference proceedings
将以下Nature Portfolio页面作为主要参考资料:
  • Nature
    格式指南
  • Nature
    编辑标准与流程
  • Nature Methods
    目标、内容与编辑政策页面
  • Nature Biotechnology
    目标、内容与编辑政策页面
  • Nature Portfolio关于报告标准、图像完整性、AI使用及预印本/会议论文的政策