Back to Details

authority-first-headlines

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Authority-First Headlines Skill

权威优先标题技能

Purpose

目的

Rewrite titles, headlines, repository descriptions, homepage hero lines, LinkedIn headlines, article titles, and section openers so they lead with credible authority before explaining the content.
Use this when a title sounds like a generic description instead of a reason to care.
重写标题、大标题、仓库描述、首页主打语、LinkedIn标题、文章标题和章节开头，使它们在解释内容之前先以可信的权威性开头。
当标题听起来像泛泛的描述而非让人关心的理由时，请使用此技能。

Core Pattern

核心模式

Authority -> Outcome -> Mechanism -> Reader Promise
Examples of authority:
  • A measurable result
  • A recognized institution
  • A senior audience
  • A hard operating context
  • A respected company, university, publication, or framework
  • A concrete proof point such as "used by 20+ engineers"
  • A rare achievement, ranking, certification, or adoption signal
权威 -> 结果 -> 机制 -> 读者承诺
权威的示例：
  • 可衡量的结果
  • 知名的机构
  • 资深受众
  • 严苛的运作环境
  • 受尊敬的公司、大学、出版物或框架
  • 具体证明点，如“被20多位工程师使用”
  • 罕见的成就、排名、认证或采用信号

Rewrite Rules

重写规则

  1. Lead with proof before explanation.
    • Weak: "A tool for setting up AI development environments."
    • Stronger: "The AI workstation setup method adapted from senior engineering workflows."
  2. Prefer specific authority over vague authority.
    • Weak: "Trusted by professionals."
    • Stronger: "Used by 20+ engineers and technical leaders."
  3. Borrowed authority must be truthful and traceable.
    • Acceptable: "Adapted from practices learned from a senior engineering lead, then customized for my own workflow."
    • Not acceptable: "Google's official workflow" unless it actually is official.
  4. Do not overclaim ownership of institutional authority.
    • Say "inspired by," "adapted from," "used in," "learned from," or "based on public guidance from" when appropriate.
    • Avoid implying endorsement.
  5. Add curiosity when possible.
    • Weak: "How to prioritize automation."
    • Stronger: "The 770-hour automation opportunity hidden behind a 41-hour roadmap."
  1. 先给出证明，再解释。
    • 弱：“一个用于搭建AI开发环境的工具。”
    • 更强：“改编自资深工程工作流的人工智能工作站搭建方法。”
  2. 具体权威优于模糊权威。
    • 弱：“深受专业人士信任。”
    • 更强：“被20多位工程师和技术负责人使用。”
  3. 借用的权威必须真实且可追溯。
    • 可接受：“改编自资深工程负责人的实践，并根据我自己的工作流程进行了定制。”
    • 不可接受：“Google官方工作流程”，除非它确实是官方的。
  4. 不要过度声称拥有机构权威。
    • 在合适时使用“灵感来自”、“改编自”、“用于”、“学习自”或“基于来自……的公开指南”。
    • 避免暗示背书。
  5. 尽可能增加好奇心。
    • 弱：“如何对自动化进行优先级排序。”
    • 更强：“隐藏在41小时路线图背后的770小时自动化机会。”

Headline Templates

标题模板

  • [Authority proof] + [result] + [reader promise]
  • [Recognized source/framework] + [practical application]
  • [Unexpected contrast] + [outcome] + [how-to promise]
  • [Senior audience adopted X] + Here's how it works
  • [Hard constraint] + [surprising result] + [repeatable method]
  • [权威证明] + [结果] + [读者承诺]
  • [知名来源/框架] + [实际应用]
  • [意想不到的对比] + [结果] + [操作指南承诺]
  • [资深受众采用了X] + 接下来看看它是如何运作的
  • [严格的限制] + [令人惊讶的结果] + [可重复的方法]

Checklist

检查清单

  • Does the title answer "why should I trust this?"
  • Does it contain a concrete proof point if available?
  • Does it avoid false endorsement?
  • Does it make the reader curious?
  • Does it imply a useful method, not just a finished artifact?
  • 标题是否回答了“我为什么应该相信这个？”
  • 是否包含具体的证明点（如果可用）？
  • 是否避免了虚假背书？
  • 是否让读者感到好奇？
  • 是否暗示了一种有用的方法，而不仅仅是成品？