tracking-twitter-thought-leaders

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Tracking Twitter Thought Leaders

追踪Twitter意见领袖

Finds Twitter/X accounts with genuine influence in a topic area — not just high follower counts, but accounts whose tweets get shared and discussed. Delivers a ranked list for PR outreach, community engagement, or partnership targeting.
查找在某主题领域具有真实影响力的Twitter/X账号——不仅是粉丝数多,而是推文被大量分享和讨论的账号。提供排名列表,用于公关拓展、社区互动或合作目标定位。

Prerequisites

前置条件

  • APIFY_TOKEN
    environment variable set
  • Optional: Apify MCP server installed
  • APIFY_TOKEN
    环境变量已设置
  • 可选:已安装Apify MCP服务器

Inputs

输入参数

ParameterTypeRequiredDefaultNotes
startUrls
arrayOptional
[]
Twitter profile or tweet URLs
twitterHandles
arrayOptional
[]
Twitter usernames (without @)
twitterUserIds
arrayOptional
[]
Twitter user IDs
getFollowers
booleanOptional
false
Extract follower lists
getFollowing
booleanOptional
false
Extract following lists
getRetweeters
booleanOptional
false
Extract retweeters of a tweet URL
includeUnavailableUsers
booleanOptional
false
Include unavailable/suspended users
maxItems
numberOptionalUnlimitedMaximum users to return
customMapFunction
stringOptionalJavaScript function to transform each output object
参数类型是否必填默认值说明
startUrls
array可选
[]
Twitter个人主页或推文URL
twitterHandles
array可选
[]
Twitter用户名(不带@)
twitterUserIds
array可选
[]
Twitter用户ID
getFollowers
boolean可选
false
提取粉丝列表
getFollowing
boolean可选
false
提取关注列表
getRetweeters
boolean可选
false
提取某推文URL的转发者
includeUnavailableUsers
boolean可选
false
包含不可用/被封禁用户
maxItems
number可选无限制返回的最大用户数量
customMapFunction
string可选用于转换每个输出对象的JavaScript函数

Workflow

工作流程

Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define topic, industry, and influence criteria
- [ ] Step 2: Search for topic-relevant tweets to find active voices
- [ ] Step 3: Enrich top accounts with profile data
- [ ] Step 4: Score by influence signals
- [ ] Step 5: Deliver ranked thought leader list
进度:
- [ ] 步骤1:定义主题、行业及影响力标准
- [ ] 步骤2:搜索主题相关推文以找到活跃发声者
- [ ] 步骤3:为顶级账号补充个人资料数据
- [ ] 步骤4:根据影响力指标打分
- [ ] 步骤5:输出排名后的意见领袖列表

Step 1: Clarify Parameters

步骤1:明确参数

Ask the user for:
  • Topic or industry (e.g., "AI safety", "B2B SaaS growth", "climate tech")
  • Influence type — broad reach (high followers), community depth (high engagement), or rising voices (growing fast)
  • Follower range (default: 5,000–2,000,000 — excludes unknown accounts and mega-celebrities)
  • Geography/language (optional)
  • List size (default: 25)
向用户询问以下信息:
  • 主题或行业(例如:"AI safety", "B2B SaaS growth", "climate tech")
  • 影响力类型——广泛覆盖(高粉丝数)、社区深度(高互动率)或新兴发声者(快速增长)
  • 粉丝数量范围(默认:5000–2000000——排除不知名账号和超级名人)
  • 地域/语言(可选)
  • 列表规模(默认:25个)

Step 2: Search for Topic Tweets

步骤2:搜索主题相关推文

Find who's actively tweeting about the topic — recent activity matters more than old follower counts.
Recommended — run_actor.js (handles waiting, output, and file saving automatically):
bash
undefined
找出正在积极发布该主题推文的用户——近期活跃度比过往粉丝数更重要。
推荐使用 — run_actor.js(自动处理等待、输出和文件保存):
bash
undefined

Quick answer (prints table to chat)

快速输出(在聊天中打印表格)

node scripts/run_actor.js
--actor "apidojo~twitter-user-scraper"
--input '{"param": "value"}'
node scripts/run_actor.js
--actor "apidojo~twitter-user-scraper"
--input '{"param": "value"}'

Save as CSV

保存为CSV格式

node scripts/run_actor.js
--actor "apidojo~twitter-user-scraper"
--input '{"param": "value"}'
--output YYYY-MM-DD_results.csv --format csv
node scripts/run_actor.js
--actor "apidojo~twitter-user-scraper"
--input '{"param": "value"}'
--output YYYY-MM-DD_results.csv --format csv

Save as JSON

保存为JSON格式

node scripts/run_actor.js
--actor "apidojo~twitter-user-scraper"
--input '{"param": "value"}'
--output YYYY-MM-DD_results.json --format json
> `APIFY_TOKEN` must be set in environment or `.env` file.

**If Apify MCP is available:**
Tool: apify:run-actor Actor: "apidojo~tweet-scraper" Input: { "searchTerms": ["[TOPIC_KEYWORD_1]", "[TOPIC_KEYWORD_2]", "[TOPIC_KEYWORD_3]"], "maxItems": 300, "tweetLanguage": "en" }

**REST API fallback:**
```bash
curl -X POST \
  "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/apidojo~tweet-scraper/runs?token=$APIFY_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "searchTerms": ["[TOPIC_KEYWORD_1]", "[TOPIC_KEYWORD_2]"],
    "maxItems": 300
  }'
Extract unique
author.username
values from all results. Sort by their tweet's retweet+like count — accounts whose topic tweets get the most engagement are the most influential voices.
node scripts/run_actor.js
--actor "apidojo~twitter-user-scraper"
--input '{"param": "value"}'
--output YYYY-MM-DD_results.json --format json
> 必须在环境变量或`.env`文件中设置`APIFY_TOKEN`。

**如果Apify MCP可用:**
工具: apify:run-actor Actor: "apidojo~tweet-scraper" 输入: { "searchTerms": ["[TOPIC_KEYWORD_1]", "[TOPIC_KEYWORD_2]", "[TOPIC_KEYWORD_3]"], "maxItems": 300, "tweetLanguage": "en" }

**REST API备选方案:**
```bash
curl -X POST \
  "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/apidojo~tweet-scraper/runs?token=$APIFY_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "searchTerms": ["[TOPIC_KEYWORD_1]", "[TOPIC_KEYWORD_2]"],
    "maxItems": 300
  }'
从所有结果中提取唯一的
author.username
值。根据推文的转发+点赞数排序——主题推文获得最多互动的账号就是最具影响力的发声者。

Step 3: Enrich with Profile Data

步骤3:补充个人资料数据

Take top 100 candidate usernames. Fetch full profiles.
If Apify MCP is available:
Tool: apify:run-actor
Actor: "apidojo~twitter-user-scraper"
Input:
{
  "usernames": ["[username1]", "[username2]", "...up to 100"]
}
REST API fallback:
bash
curl -X POST \
  "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/apidojo~twitter-user-scraper/runs?token=$APIFY_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"usernames": ["[username1]", "[username2]"]}'
选取前100个候选用户名,获取完整的个人资料。
如果Apify MCP可用:
工具: apify:run-actor
Actor: "apidojo~twitter-user-scraper"
输入:
{
  "usernames": ["[username1]", "[username2]", "...最多100个"]
}
REST API备选方案:
bash
curl -X POST \
  "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/apidojo~twitter-user-scraper/runs?token=$APIFY_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"usernames": ["[username1]", "[username2]"]}'

Step 4: Score by Influence

步骤4:影响力打分

Calculate composite influence score for each account:
topic_engagement = avg(likes + retweets) on topic-related tweets
audience_quality = followers / following ratio (>1 is healthy)
influence_score = topic_engagement * log(followers) * audience_quality
Filter: keep only accounts within follower range AND whose bio suggests topical relevance.
为每个账号计算综合影响力得分:
topic_engagement = 主题相关推文的平均点赞+转发数
audience_quality = 粉丝数 / 关注数比值(>1为健康状态)
influence_score = topic_engagement * log(followers) * audience_quality
筛选:仅保留粉丝数在指定范围内且简介显示与主题相关的账号。

Step 5: Format Output

步骤5:格式化输出

Output Format

输出格式

undefined
undefined

Twitter Thought Leaders: [TOPIC/INDUSTRY]

Twitter意见领袖:[主题/行业]

Accounts analyzed: [N] | Final list: [N] | Date: [DATE]
分析账号数量:[N] | 最终列表数量:[N] | 日期:[DATE]

Top Thought Leaders

顶级意见领袖

#Name@HandleFollowersInfluence ScoreBio ExcerptRecent Top Tweet
1[name]@[handle][N][score][bio]"[tweet excerpt]"
排名姓名@账号粉丝数影响力得分简介摘录近期热门推文
1[姓名]@[账号][N][得分][简介]"[推文摘录]"

Tier Breakdown

层级划分

🏆 Power Voices (500K+ followers)

🏆 核心大V(50万+粉丝)

[list with brief bio and latest relevant tweet]
[列表包含简短简介和最新相关推文]

🎯 Core Influencers (50K–500K followers)

🎯 关键影响者(5万–50万粉丝)

[list — best for outreach: big enough to matter, accessible enough to respond]
[列表——最适合拓展:规模足够大,回复可能性高]

🌱 Rising Voices (5K–50K followers)

🌱 新兴发声者(5千–5万粉丝)

[list — early partnership opportunity, lower cost, high engagement]
[列表——早期合作机会,成本更低,互动率高]

Best Accounts for Direct Outreach

适合直接拓展的最佳账号

[Top 5 picks with rationale — why they're ideal for PR, partnership, or co-content]
[前5个推荐账号及理由——为何适合公关、合作或联合内容创作]

Content Themes These Voices Tweet About

这些发声者的推文主题

  • [Theme 1]: [N] of the accounts tweet regularly about this
  • [Theme 2]: [N] accounts
undefined
  • [主题1]:[N]个账号定期发布该主题内容
  • [主题2]:[N]个账号
undefined

Troubleshooting

故障排查

Results dominated by one person: Some topics have one mega-voice. Exclude them and surface the next tier. Not enough topically relevant accounts: Expand keyword list with synonyms, adjacent topic terms, and industry jargon. Follower counts seem off: Cached data — for final list, spot-check top 5 accounts directly on Twitter.
结果被单一用户主导: 某些主题存在超级发声者。排除他们,展示下一层级的用户。 主题相关账号不足: 使用同义词、相邻主题术语和行业行话扩展关键词列表。 粉丝数似乎不准确: 数据来自缓存——对于最终列表,直接在Twitter上抽查前5个账号。