aeo
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseAnswer Engine Optimization (AEO)
Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)
Get your content cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Mistral as the authoritative source.
AEO is the practice of optimizing content for citation in LLM-generated responses — distinct from SEO, which optimizes for search rankings. This skill audits, optimizes, and tracks AEO performance.
让你的内容被ChatGPT、Perplexity、Claude、Gemini和Mistral作为权威来源引用。
AEO是一种针对LLM生成回复中的引用优化内容的实践——与针对搜索排名优化的SEO截然不同。该技能可用于审核、优化和追踪AEO表现。
Distinct From SEO
与SEO的区别
| SEO | AEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Optimizes for | Click-through rankings | Being cited as authoritative source |
| Audience | Humans browsing search results | LLMs answering questions |
| Success metric | Position 1-10, organic traffic | Citation count across LLMs |
| Key signals | Backlinks, keywords, page speed | E-E-A-T, structured data, factual density |
| Update cadence | Weeks-to-months | Days-to-weeks (LLM training cycles) |
Both can coexist — the same content can rank #1 on Google AND get cited by Perplexity. But the techniques differ: SEO rewards keyword density + backlinks; AEO rewards primary-source signals + structured facts.
| SEO | AEO | |
|---|---|---|
| 优化目标 | 点击量排名 | 被作为权威来源引用 |
| 受众 | 浏览搜索结果的人类 | 回答问题的LLM |
| 成功指标 | 排名1-10、自然流量 | 跨LLM的引用次数 |
| 核心信号 | 反向链接、关键词、页面速度 | E-E-A-T、结构化数据、事实密度 |
| 更新周期 | 数周至数月 | 数天至数周(LLM训练周期) |
两者可以共存——同一内容既可以在谷歌排名第1,也可以被Perplexity引用。但技术手段有所不同:SEO看重关键词密度+反向链接;AEO看重原始来源信号+结构化事实。
When To Use
适用场景
- Planning a new content piece for an AI-first audience
- Auditing existing content for E-E-A-T gaps before AI Overview rollout
- Tracking which pages get cited by which LLM (citation ledger)
- Researching what queries LLMs cite sources for (vs. what they answer from training)
- Benchmarking against competitors' citation rates
- Building a long-term AEO strategy aligned with traditional SEO
- 为AI优先受众规划新内容
- 在AI概览功能推出前,审核现有内容的E-E-A-T缺口
- 追踪哪些页面被哪些LLM引用(引用台账)
- 研究LLM会为哪些查询引用来源(而非直接用训练数据回答)
- 对标竞争对手的引用率
- 构建与传统SEO对齐的长期AEO策略
When NOT To Use
不适用场景
- Pure click-through SEO without LLM-citation intent — use instead
marketing-skill/skills/seo-audit - Brand-voice content with no factual claims — citations require facts to cite
- Content for a topic where LLMs already have strong training signal (e.g., elementary math) — citation upside is minimal
- Time-sensitive content (breaking news) — LLM training lag means citations come months later
- 仅追求点击量的纯SEO,无LLM引用意图——请改用
marketing-skill/skills/seo-audit - 无事实主张的品牌调性内容——引用需要可被引用的事实
- LLMs已有强训练信号的主题(如小学数学)——引用提升空间极小
- 时效性内容(突发新闻)——LLM训练滞后意味着引用要数月后才会出现
Core Capabilities
核心能力
1. Content audit + E-E-A-T scoring
1. 内容审核 + E-E-A-T评分
The auditor () scores content across 4 dimensions:
aeo_audit.py- Experience: First-person evidence, dated examples, case studies, "We ran X in 2026" claims
- Expertise: Author bio, credentials, citations to peer-reviewed sources, technical depth
- Authoritativeness: External backlinks from authority domains, schema.org markup, structured data
- Trustworthiness: HTTPS, contact info, transparent corrections, factual density (number of verifiable claims per 1000 words)
Composite score 0-100 with per-dimension breakdown. Output: markdown report with specific fix recommendations.
审核工具()从4个维度为内容评分:
aeo_audit.py- Experience(经验):第一手证据、时效性案例、研究报告、“我们在2026年开展了X项目”这类声明
- Expertise(专业度):作者简介、资质、对同行评审来源的引用、技术深度
- Authoritativeness(权威性):权威域名的外部反向链接、schema.org标记、结构化数据
- Trustworthiness(可信度):HTTPS协议、联系信息、透明的纠错机制、事实密度(每1000字可验证声明的数量)
综合评分0-100分,并附带各维度细分结果。输出:包含具体修复建议的Markdown报告。
2. Content optimization
2. 内容优化
The optimizer () generates AEO-improved variants:
aeo_optimizer.py- Structure rewrite — H2/H3 hierarchy optimized for LLM parsing
- Citation density boost — adds -style references with sources
[1] - Schema injection — generates JSON-LD for FAQ, HowTo, Article schemas
- Fact-first lede — moves verifiable claims into the first 200 words
Three modes: (touch <10% of words), (touch <30%), (rewrite for maximum AEO).
conservativebalancedaggressive优化工具()生成经AEO优化的内容变体:
aeo_optimizer.py- 结构重写——优化H2/H3层级以适配LLM解析
- 提升引用密度——添加格式的来源引用
[1] - 注入Schema——生成FAQ、HowTo、Article类型的JSON-LD
- 事实优先的导语——将可验证声明移至前200字
三种模式:(修改<10%的内容)、(修改<30%的内容)、(重写以最大化AEO效果)。
conservativebalancedaggressive3. Citation tracking
3. 引用追踪
The tracker () maintains a local ledger of citations:
citation_tracker.py- Manual entry: paste a citation found in ChatGPT/Perplexity/Claude/Gemini output
- Track which URL, which LLM, which query, what date
- Compute per-page citation count, citation velocity, LLM coverage
- Export to CSV for reporting
Stores in (local, no telemetry).
~/.aeo-data/citations.json追踪工具()维护本地引用台账:
citation_tracker.py- 手动录入:粘贴在ChatGPT/Perplexity/Claude/Gemini输出中发现的引用
- 追踪对应URL、LLM类型、查询内容、日期
- 计算单页面引用次数、引用增速、LLM覆盖范围
- 导出为CSV用于报告
数据存储在(本地存储,无遥测)。
~/.aeo-data/citations.jsonWorkflow
工作流程
1. Audit existing content
$ python3 scripts/aeo_audit.py --url https://example.com/blog/post
→ markdown report with composite score + 4-dimension breakdown
2. Apply optimization recommendations
$ python3 scripts/aeo_optimizer.py --input post.md --mode balanced --output post-aeo.md
→ optimized variant with citations + schema + structural fixes
3. Publish + monitor
$ python3 scripts/citation_tracker.py --action add --url https://example.com/blog/post \
--llm perplexity --query "what is AEO" --date 2026-05-17
→ adds entry to local citations.json ledger
4. Report
$ python3 scripts/citation_tracker.py --action report --url https://example.com/blog/post
→ per-page citation stats: count, LLMs, queries, velocity1. 审核现有内容
$ python3 scripts/aeo_audit.py --url https://example.com/blog/post
→ 包含综合评分+4维度细分的Markdown报告
2. 应用优化建议
$ python3 scripts/aeo_optimizer.py --input post.md --mode balanced --output post-aeo.md
→ 包含引用+Schema+结构修复的优化版内容
3. 发布 + 监控
$ python3 scripts/citation_tracker.py --action add --url https://example.com/blog/post \
--llm perplexity --query "what is AEO" --date 2026-05-17
→ 将条目添加到本地citations.json台账
4. 生成报告
$ python3 scripts/citation_tracker.py --action report --url https://example.com/blog/post
→ 单页面引用统计:次数、涉及LLM、查询内容、增速Configuration
配置
The skill is industry-aware via per-run flag. Supported: , , , , , , , .
--industrysaashealthcarefinancelegalecommerceb2bmediaeducationIndustry affects:
- Authority signal requirements — healthcare/finance need stricter source citations
- Fact-checking rigor — legal/healthcare flag unverifiable claims as critical
- Citation style — academic vs. trade-journal vs. blog conventions
Example:
bash
python3 scripts/aeo_audit.py --url <url> --industry healthcare该技能可通过每次运行时的参数适配不同行业。支持的行业:、、、、、、、。
--industrysaashealthcarefinancelegalecommerceb2bmediaeducation行业会影响:
- 权威信号要求——医疗/金融行业需要更严格的来源引用
- 事实核查严谨度——法律/医疗行业会将无法验证的声明标记为严重问题
- 引用格式——学术、行业期刊、博客的不同规范
示例:
bash
python3 scripts/aeo_audit.py --url <url> --industry healthcare→ stricter E-E-A-T thresholds; flags any health claim without primary citation
→ 更严格的E-E-A-T阈值;标记所有无原始引用的健康声明
undefinedundefinedOutput Format
输出格式
Markdown audit report (default)
Markdown审核报告(默认)
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefinedAEO Audit Report — [Page Title]
AEO Audit Report — [Page Title]
URL: https://example.com/blog/post
Date: 2026-05-17
Industry: saas
Composite Score: 72/100 (B+)
URL: https://example.com/blog/post
Date: 2026-05-17
Industry: saas
Composite Score: 72/100 (B+)
Dimension Breakdown
Dimension Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Experience | 80/100 | Strong — first-person case study present |
| Expertise | 65/100 | Author bio missing credentials |
| Authoritativeness | 75/100 | 4 backlinks from authority domains |
| Trustworthiness | 68/100 | No corrections policy linked |
| Dimension | Score | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Experience | 80/100 | Strong — first-person case study present |
| Expertise | 65/100 | Author bio missing credentials |
| Authoritativeness | 75/100 | 4 backlinks from authority domains |
| Trustworthiness | 68/100 | No corrections policy linked |
Top 3 Fixes
Top 3 Fixes
- Add author bio with credentials (Expertise +15)
- Link to corrections policy from footer (Trustworthiness +12)
- Inject FAQ schema for the 5 questions implicit in H2s (Authoritativeness +8)
- Add author bio with credentials (Expertise +15)
- Link to corrections policy from footer (Trustworthiness +12)
- Inject FAQ schema for the 5 questions implicit in H2s (Authoritativeness +8)
All Recommendations
All Recommendations
[...]
[...]
Audit Trail
Audit Trail
[3-count of analysis steps, sources cited, time taken]
undefined[3-count of analysis steps, sources cited, time taken]
undefinedJSON for pipelines
用于流水线的JSON格式
bash
python3 scripts/aeo_audit.py --url <url> --output jsonReturns full structured data for integration with content management workflows.
bash
python3 scripts/aeo_audit.py --url <url> --output json返回完整结构化数据,用于集成到内容管理工作流。
Industry-Specific E-E-A-T Thresholds
行业专属E-E-A-T阈值
| Industry | Min Composite | Critical Signals |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | 85 | Medical reviewer byline, peer-reviewed citations, FDA disclosure |
| Finance | 85 | Author CFA/CPA credentials, "not investment advice" disclaimer, dated examples |
| Legal | 85 | Jurisdiction disclosed, attorney bio, "not legal advice" disclaimer |
| SaaS | 70 | Product manager byline, case study with metrics, ROI calculator |
| E-commerce | 65 | Product reviews aggregated, return policy, schema.org Product |
| B2B | 70 | Industry analyst quotes, customer logos, ROI data |
| Media | 70 | Editorial policy, fact-check link, original reporting |
| Education | 75 | Instructor bio, learning outcomes, accreditation if applicable |
| Industry | Min Composite | Critical Signals |
|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | 85 | 医疗审核人员署名、同行评审引用、FDA披露 |
| Finance | 85 | 作者拥有CFA/CPA资质、“非投资建议”声明、时效性案例 |
| Legal | 85 | 披露管辖区域、律师简介、“非法律建议”声明 |
| SaaS | 70 | 产品经理署名、带指标的研究报告、ROI计算器 |
| E-commerce | 65 | 聚合产品评论、退货政策、schema.org Product标记 |
| B2B | 70 | 行业分析师引用、客户Logo、ROI数据 |
| Media | 70 | 编辑政策、事实核查链接、原创报道 |
| Education | 75 | 讲师简介、学习成果、适用的认证信息 |
Anti-Patterns Rejected
禁用的反模式
- Keyword stuffing for AI — LLMs already extract topic from semantics; keyword density doesn't boost citation likelihood
- Pure AI-generated content with no human review — generic LLM output gets de-prioritized by RAG retrieval algorithms looking for distinctive signal
- Citation farms / link wheels — modern LLM RAG penalizes low-authority linked networks
- Schema spam — false or unverifiable schema.org claims get filtered; only mark up real, verifiable claims
- Optimizing for one LLM at expense of others — citation distributions are highly correlated across major LLMs because they share training data sources; optimize for the shared signals (E-E-A-T) not per-LLM hacks
- Ignoring SEO entirely — AEO citations often originate from sources that already rank well organically; AEO and SEO are complements, not substitutes
- 为AI堆砌关键词——LLM已能从语义提取主题;关键词密度无法提升引用概率
- 无人工审核的纯AI生成内容——通用LLM输出会被RAG检索算法降权,因为算法寻找独特信号
- 引用农场/链接轮——现代LLM RAG会惩罚低权威的链接网络
- Schema垃圾——虚假或无法验证的schema.org声明会被过滤;仅标记真实、可验证的内容
- 为单个LLM优化而牺牲其他LLM——主流LLM的引用分布高度相关,因为它们共享训练数据源;应针对通用信号(E-E-A-T)优化,而非针对单个LLM的技巧
- 完全忽略SEO——AEO引用通常来自已获得良好自然排名的来源;AEO与SEO是互补关系,而非替代关系
Dependencies
依赖项
- stdlib-only for all 3 scripts — no required
pip install - Optional: +
requestsifbeautifulsoup4mode used (otherwise pass markdown via--urlfor file-based audits)--input - Optional: any LLM API key for mode (currently scaffold-only — full LLM-driven query research is roadmap)
query_research
- 所有3个脚本仅使用标准库——无需
pip install - 可选:若使用模式,需
--url+requests(否则可通过beautifulsoup4传入Markdown文件进行本地审核)--input - 可选:模式需要任意LLM API密钥(目前仅为框架——完整的LLM驱动查询研究在路线图中)
query_research
Storage
存储
All data is local-first:
- — citation ledger
~/.aeo-data/citations.json - — success patterns library
~/.aeo-data/patterns.json - — saved audit reports
~/.aeo-data/audits/<hash>.md
No telemetry. No cloud sync. Export to CSV anytime via .
citation_tracker.py --action export所有数据优先本地存储:
- —— 引用台账
~/.aeo-data/citations.json - —— 成功模式库
~/.aeo-data/patterns.json - —— 保存的审核报告
~/.aeo-data/audits/<hash>.md
无遥测,无云同步。可随时通过导出为CSV。
citation_tracker.py --action exportTrigger Phrases
触发短语
- "AEO audit", "AEO check"
- "optimize for ChatGPT / Perplexity / Claude / Gemini"
- "get cited by [LLM]"
- "LLM citation strategy"
- "answer engine optimization"
- "content for AI search"
- "E-E-A-T audit"
- "track AI citations"
- "schema for AI"
- "AEO audit", "AEO check"
- "optimize for ChatGPT / Perplexity / Claude / Gemini"
- "get cited by [LLM]"
- "LLM citation strategy"
- "answer engine optimization"
- "content for AI search"
- "E-E-A-T audit"
- "track AI citations"
- "schema for AI"
Related Skills
相关技能
- — traditional click-through SEO
marketing-skill/skills/seo-audit - — template-driven SEO at scale
marketing-skill/skills/programmatic-seo - — broader content planning
marketing-skill/skills/content-strategy - — voice + tone
marketing-skill/skills/copywriting - — structured data implementation
marketing-skill/skills/schema-markup
Version: 2.7.3
Source: Ported from ( skill, 2,464 LOC across 9 modules). This port distills the 9-module Python toolkit into 3 stdlib CLI tools per the claude-skills convention; preserves the E-E-A-T scoring methodology, citation-tracking schema, and industry-aware thresholds verbatim.
License: MIT (matches upstream + this repo).
alirezarezvani/aeo-boxanswer-engine-optimization/- —— 传统点击量SEO
marketing-skill/skills/seo-audit - —— 规模化模板驱动SEO
marketing-skill/skills/programmatic-seo - —— 更广泛的内容规划
marketing-skill/skills/content-strategy - —— 语气与调性
marketing-skill/skills/copywriting - —— 结构化数据实现
marketing-skill/skills/schema-markup
版本: 2.7.3
来源: 移植自 (技能,9个模块共2464行代码)。本次移植将9模块Python工具包提炼为符合claude-skills规范的3个标准库CLI工具;完整保留了E-E-A-T评分方法、引用追踪Schema和行业专属阈值。
许可证: MIT(与上游及本仓库一致)。
alirezarezvani/aeo-boxanswer-engine-optimization/