wiki-explore

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Personal Wiki — Explore

个人维基 — 探索

Discover cross-domain connections, analogies, and tensions across the wiki.

探索维基中的跨领域关联、类比与矛盾。

How It Works

工作原理

1. Read the full inventory

1. 读取完整目录

Read

wiki/index.md

to get the complete list of all wiki pages across all categories (Sources, Entities, Concepts, Synthesis).

读取

wiki/index.md

以获取所有分类（来源、实体、概念、综合）下的全部维基页面列表。

2. Read concept and entity pages

2. 读取概念与实体页面

Read all pages in

wiki/concepts/

and

wiki/entities/

. If the wiki is very large (100+ pages), read a representative sample that covers the broadest range of domains and tags.

读取

wiki/concepts/

和

wiki/entities/

下的所有页面。如果维基内容非常庞大（超过100个页面），则读取具有代表性的样本，确保覆盖最广泛的领域和标签。

3. Analyze for connections

3. 分析关联

Scan the content for three types of cross-domain connections:

Analogies Same pattern appearing in different domains. Look for:

Structural similarities (e.g. feedback loops in biology AND economics)
Shared mechanisms (e.g. network effects in social media AND epidemiology)
Parallel frameworks (e.g. evolution in biology AND market competition)

Tensions Where different domains or sources disagree on the same underlying question. Look for:

Contradictory claims about similar phenomena across fields
Different assumptions that lead to conflicting conclusions
Unresolved debates where different disciplines take opposing sides

Connection Map Surprising links between concepts that aren't currently wikilinked. Look for:

Concepts from different domains that share terminology or underlying principles
Entities that bridge multiple fields but aren't linked across those pages
Ideas that appear in different contexts but haven't been connected

扫描内容以寻找三种类型的跨领域关联：

类比不同领域中出现的相同模式。需关注：

结构相似性（例如：生物学与经济学中的反馈循环）
共享机制（例如：社交媒体与流行病学中的网络效应）
平行框架（例如：生物学中的进化与市场竞争）

矛盾不同领域或来源对同一核心问题存在分歧的情况。需关注：

不同领域对相似现象的矛盾主张
导致结论冲突的不同假设
不同学科持对立观点的未解决争论

关联图谱 当前未建立维基链接的概念间的意外关联。需关注：

不同领域中共享术语或底层原理的概念
横跨多个领域但未在对应页面建立链接的实体
出现在不同语境但尚未建立关联的想法

Output Format

输出格式

Present findings in chat — do not save to the wiki.

Group by connection type:

在对话中呈现发现结果 — 请勿保存到维基。

按关联类型分组：

Analogies

类比

For each analogy found:

The two (or more) concepts/domains involved
Brief explanation of the structural similarity
Which wiki pages contain the relevant information:
```
[[Page A]]
```
,
```
[[Page B]]
```

对于每个发现的类比：

涉及的两个（或多个）概念/领域
结构相似性的简要说明
包含相关信息的维基页面：
```
[[页面A]]
```
、
```
[[页面B]]
```

Tensions

矛盾

For each tension found:

The conflicting claims or assumptions
Which domains/sources take which side
The wiki pages involved:
```
[[Page A]]
```
,
```
[[Page B]]
```

对于每个发现的矛盾：

相互冲突的主张或假设
各领域/来源所持的立场
涉及的维基页面：
```
[[页面A]]
```
、
```
[[页面B]]
```

Unexpected Links

意外关联

For each surprising connection:

What the connection is
Why it's non-obvious
The wiki pages that could be linked:
```
[[Page A]]
```
↔
```
[[Page B]]
```

When useful, include a Mermaid diagram showing the connection map:

mermaid

graph LR
  A[Concept A] -->|analogy| B[Concept B]
  C[Concept C] -->|tension| D[Concept D]
  A -.->|unexpected| C

对于每个意外关联：

关联内容是什么
为何它并不明显
可建立链接的维基页面：
```
[[页面A]]
```
↔
```
[[页面B]]
```

必要时，可包含展示关联图谱的Mermaid图表：