seo-geo
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseAI Search / GEO Optimization (February 2026)
AI搜索 / GEO优化(2026年2月)
Key Statistics
关键数据
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| AI Overviews reach | 1.5 billion users/month across 200+ countries | |
| AI Overviews query coverage | 50%+ of all queries | Industry data |
| AI-referred sessions growth | 527% (Jan-May 2025) | SparkToro |
| ChatGPT weekly active users | 900 million | OpenAI |
| Perplexity monthly queries | 500+ million | Perplexity |
| 指标 | 数值 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|
| AI Overviews覆盖用户 | 每月15亿+,覆盖200+国家 | |
| AI Overviews查询覆盖占比 | 所有查询的50%以上 | 行业数据 |
| AI引流会话量增长率 | 527%(2025年1-5月) | SparkToro |
| ChatGPT周活跃用户 | 9亿 | OpenAI |
| Perplexity月查询量 | 5亿+ | Perplexity |
Critical Insight: Brand Mentions > Backlinks
核心洞察:品牌提及 > 反向链接
Brand mentions correlate 3× more strongly with AI visibility than backlinks.
(Ahrefs December 2025 study of 75,000 brands)
| Signal | Correlation with AI Citations |
|---|---|
| YouTube mentions | ~0.737 (strongest) |
| Reddit mentions | High |
| Wikipedia presence | High |
| LinkedIn presence | Moderate |
| Domain Rating (backlinks) | ~0.266 (weak) |
Only 11% of domains are cited by both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews for the same query — platform-specific optimization is essential.
品牌提及与AI可见性的相关性是反向链接的3倍。
(Ahrefs 2025年12月针对75000个品牌的研究)
| 信号 | 与AI引用的相关性 |
|---|---|
| YouTube提及 | ~0.737(最强) |
| Reddit提及 | 高 |
| Wikipedia收录 | 高 |
| LinkedIn曝光 | 中等 |
| 域名评级(反向链接) | ~0.266(弱) |
仅11%的域名会在同一查询下同时被ChatGPT和Google AI Overviews引用——平台专属优化至关重要。
GEO Analysis Criteria (Updated)
GEO分析标准(更新版)
1. Citability Score (25%)
1. 可引用性评分(25%)
Optimal passage length: 134-167 words for AI citation.
Strong signals:
- Clear, quotable sentences with specific facts/statistics
- Self-contained answer blocks (can be extracted without context)
- Direct answer in first 40-60 words of section
- Claims attributed with specific sources
- Definitions following "X is..." or "X refers to..." patterns
- Unique data points not found elsewhere
Weak signals:
- Vague, general statements
- Opinion without evidence
- Buried conclusions
- No specific data points
AI引用的最佳段落长度:134-167词
强信号:
- 包含具体事实/数据、清晰可引用的句子
- 独立完整的回答模块(无需上下文即可提取)
- 段落前40-60词给出直接答案
- 主张附带具体来源标注
- 采用“X是……”或“X指的是……”格式的定义
- 独有的、未在其他地方出现的数据点
弱信号:
- 模糊、笼统的表述
- 无证据支撑的观点
- 结论被隐藏
- 无具体数据点
2. Structural Readability (20%)
2. 结构可读性(20%)
92% of AI Overview citations come from top-10 ranking pages, but 47% come from pages ranking below position 5 — demonstrating different selection logic.
Strong signals:
- Clean H1→H2→H3 heading hierarchy
- Question-based headings (matches query patterns)
- Short paragraphs (2-4 sentences)
- Tables for comparative data
- Ordered/unordered lists for step-by-step or multi-item content
- FAQ sections with clear Q&A format
Weak signals:
- Wall of text with no structure
- Inconsistent heading hierarchy
- No lists or tables
- Information buried in paragraphs
92%的AI Overviews引用来自排名前10的页面,但47%来自排名5名之后的页面——这表明AI的内容选择逻辑与传统搜索不同。
强信号:
- 清晰的H1→H2→H3标题层级
- 基于问题的标题(匹配查询模式)
- 短段落(2-4句)
- 用于对比数据的表格
- 用于步骤说明或多内容项的有序/无序列表
- 采用清晰问答格式的FAQ板块
弱信号:
- 无结构的大段文字
- 不一致的标题层级
- 无列表或表格
- 信息被埋在段落中
3. Multi-Modal Content (15%)
3. 多模态内容(15%)
Content with multi-modal elements sees 156% higher selection rates.
Check for:
- Text + relevant images
- Video content (embedded or linked)
- Infographics and charts
- Interactive elements (calculators, tools)
- Structured data supporting media
包含多模态元素的内容被AI选中的概率高出156%。
检查要点:
- 文字+相关图片
- 嵌入或链接的视频内容
- 信息图和图表
- 交互元素(计算器、工具)
- 支持媒体的结构化数据
4. Authority & Brand Signals (20%)
4. 权威性与品牌信号(20%)
Strong signals:
- Author byline with credentials
- Publication date and last-updated date
- Citations to primary sources (studies, official docs, data)
- Organization credentials and affiliations
- Expert quotes with attribution
- Entity presence in Wikipedia, Wikidata
- Mentions on Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn
Weak signals:
- Anonymous authorship
- No dates
- No sources cited
- No brand presence across platforms
强信号:
- 带有资质说明的作者署名
- 发布日期和最后更新日期
- 引用一手来源(研究、官方文档、数据)
- 机构资质与关联信息
- 带署名的专家引用
- 在Wikipedia、Wikidata中的实体收录
- 在Reddit、YouTube、LinkedIn上的提及
弱信号:
- 匿名作者
- 无日期标注
- 无来源引用
- 跨平台无品牌曝光
5. Technical Accessibility (20%)
5. 技术可访问性(20%)
AI crawlers do NOT execute JavaScript — server-side rendering is critical.
Check for:
- Server-side rendering (SSR) vs client-only content
- AI crawler access in robots.txt
- llms.txt file presence and configuration
- RSL 1.0 licensing terms
AI爬虫不执行JavaScript——服务端渲染至关重要。
检查要点:
- 服务端渲染(SSR)vs 纯客户端内容
- robots.txt中AI爬虫的访问权限
- llms.txt文件的存在与配置
- RSL 1.0许可条款
AI Crawler Detection
AI爬虫检测
Check for these AI crawlers:
robots.txt| Crawler | Owner | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| GPTBot | OpenAI | ChatGPT web search |
| OAI-SearchBot | OpenAI | OpenAI search features |
| ChatGPT-User | OpenAI | ChatGPT browsing |
| ClaudeBot | Anthropic | Claude web features |
| PerplexityBot | Perplexity | Perplexity AI search |
| CCBot | Common Crawl | Training data (often blocked) |
| anthropic-ai | Anthropic | Claude training |
| Bytespider | ByteDance | TikTok/Douyin AI |
| cohere-ai | Cohere | Cohere models |
Recommendation: Allow GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot for AI search visibility. Block CCBot and training crawlers if desired.
在robots.txt中检查以下AI爬虫:
| 爬虫名称 | 所属方 | 用途 |
|---|---|---|
| GPTBot | OpenAI | ChatGPT网页搜索 |
| OAI-SearchBot | OpenAI | OpenAI搜索功能 |
| ChatGPT-User | OpenAI | ChatGPT浏览功能 |
| ClaudeBot | Anthropic | Claude网页功能 |
| PerplexityBot | Perplexity | Perplexity AI搜索 |
| CCBot | Common Crawl | 训练数据抓取(通常被拦截) |
| anthropic-ai | Anthropic | Claude模型训练 |
| Bytespider | ByteDance | TikTok/Douyin AI |
| cohere-ai | Cohere | Cohere模型训练 |
建议: 允许GPTBot、OAI-SearchBot、ClaudeBot、PerplexityBot以提升AI搜索可见性。如需保护数据,可拦截CCBot及其他训练类爬虫。
llms.txt Standard
llms.txt标准
The emerging llms.txt standard provides AI crawlers with structured content guidance.
Location: (root of domain)
/llms.txtFormat:
undefined新兴的llms.txt标准为AI爬虫提供结构化的内容指引。
存放位置: 域名根目录下的
/llms.txt格式:
undefinedTitle of site
网站标题
Brief description
简短描述
Main sections
主要板块
- Page title: Description
- Another page: Description
- 页面标题: 描述
- 另一页面: 描述
Optional: Key facts
可选:关键事实
- Fact 1
- Fact 2
**Check for:**
- Presence of `/llms.txt`
- Structured content guidance
- Key page highlights
- Contact/authority information
---- 事实1
- 事实2
**检查要点:**
- `/llms.txt`文件是否存在
- 是否包含结构化内容指引
- 是否突出关键页面
- 是否包含联系/权威性信息
---RSL 1.0 (Really Simple Licensing)
RSL 1.0(简易许可协议)
New standard (December 2025) for machine-readable AI licensing terms.
Backed by: Reddit, Yahoo, Medium, Quora, Cloudflare, Akamai, Creative Commons
Check for: RSL implementation and appropriate licensing terms.
2025年12月推出的新标准,用于机器可读的AI许可条款。
支持方: Reddit、Yahoo、Medium、Quora、Cloudflare、Akamai、Creative Commons
检查要点: RSL协议的实施情况及许可条款是否恰当。
Platform-Specific Optimization
平台专属优化
| Platform | Key Citation Sources | Optimization Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Google AI Overviews | Top-10 ranking pages (92%) | Traditional SEO + passage optimization |
| ChatGPT | Wikipedia (47.9%), Reddit (11.3%) | Entity presence, authoritative sources |
| Perplexity | Reddit (46.7%), Wikipedia | Community validation, discussions |
| Bing Copilot | Bing index, authoritative sites | Bing SEO, IndexNow |
| 平台 | 主要引用来源 | 优化重点 |
|---|---|---|
| Google AI Overviews | 排名前10的页面(92%) | 传统SEO+段落优化 |
| ChatGPT | Wikipedia(47.9%)、Reddit(11.3%) | 实体收录、权威来源 |
| Perplexity | Reddit(46.7%)、Wikipedia | 社区验证、讨论内容 |
| Bing Copilot | Bing索引、权威站点 | Bing SEO、IndexNow |
Output
输出成果
Generate with:
GEO-ANALYSIS.md- GEO Readiness Score: XX/100
- Platform breakdown (Google AIO, ChatGPT, Perplexity scores)
- AI Crawler Access Status (which crawlers allowed/blocked)
- llms.txt Status (present, missing, recommendations)
- Brand Mention Analysis (presence on Wikipedia, Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn)
- Passage-Level Citability (optimal 134-167 word blocks identified)
- Server-Side Rendering Check (JavaScript dependency analysis)
- Top 5 Highest-Impact Changes
- Schema Recommendations (for AI discoverability)
- Content Reformatting Suggestions (specific passages to rewrite)
生成文件,包含:
GEO-ANALYSIS.md- GEO就绪度评分:XX/100
- 平台细分评分(Google AIO、ChatGPT、Perplexity各自得分)
- AI爬虫访问状态(允许/拦截的爬虫列表)
- llms.txt状态(存在、缺失、优化建议)
- 品牌提及分析(在Wikipedia、Reddit、YouTube、LinkedIn上的曝光情况)
- 段落级可引用性(识别出的134-167词最佳段落)
- 服务端渲染检查(JavaScript依赖分析)
- Top 5高影响优化建议
- Schema推荐(提升AI可发现性)
- 内容重排建议(需改写的具体段落)
Quick Wins
快速优化项
- Add "What is [topic]?" definition in first 60 words
- Create 134-167 word self-contained answer blocks
- Add question-based H2/H3 headings
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add publication/update dates
- Implement Person schema for authors
- Allow key AI crawlers in robots.txt
- 在前60词中添加“什么是[主题]?”的定义
- 创建134-167词的独立完整回答模块
- 添加基于问题的H2/H3标题
- 包含带来源的具体数据
- 添加发布/更新日期
- 为作者实现Person schema
- 在robots.txt中允许核心AI爬虫访问
Medium Effort
中等难度优化项
- Create file
/llms.txt - Add author bio with credentials + Wikipedia/LinkedIn links
- Ensure server-side rendering for key content
- Build entity presence on Reddit, YouTube
- Add comparison tables with data
- Implement FAQ sections (structured, not schema for commercial sites)
- 创建文件
/llms.txt - 添加带资质的作者简介及Wikipedia/LinkedIn链接
- 确保核心内容采用服务端渲染
- 在Reddit、YouTube上建立品牌实体曝光
- 添加带数据的对比表格
- 新增FAQ板块(结构化,商业站点无需添加FAQ schema)
High Impact
高影响优化项
- Create original research/surveys (unique citability)
- Build Wikipedia presence for brand/key people
- Establish YouTube channel with content mentions
- Implement comprehensive entity linking (sameAs across platforms)
- Develop unique tools or calculators
- 开展原创研究/调研(提升独家可引用性)
- 为品牌/核心人物建立Wikipedia收录
- 创建YouTube频道并植入品牌提及
- 实现全面的实体链接(跨平台sameAs关联)
- 开发独家工具或计算器