seo-geo

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

AI Search / GEO Optimization (February 2026)

AI搜索 / GEO优化(2026年2月)

Key Statistics

关键数据

MetricValueSource
AI Overviews reach1.5 billion users/month across 200+ countriesGoogle
AI Overviews query coverage50%+ of all queriesIndustry data
AI-referred sessions growth527% (Jan-May 2025)SparkToro
ChatGPT weekly active users900 millionOpenAI
Perplexity monthly queries500+ millionPerplexity
指标数值来源
AI Overviews覆盖用户每月15亿+,覆盖200+国家Google
AI Overviews查询覆盖占比所有查询的50%以上行业数据
AI引流会话量增长率527%(2025年1-5月)SparkToro
ChatGPT周活跃用户9亿OpenAI
Perplexity月查询量5亿+Perplexity

Critical Insight: Brand Mentions > Backlinks

核心洞察:品牌提及 > 反向链接

Brand mentions correlate 3× more strongly with AI visibility than backlinks. (Ahrefs December 2025 study of 75,000 brands)
SignalCorrelation with AI Citations
YouTube mentions~0.737 (strongest)
Reddit mentionsHigh
Wikipedia presenceHigh
LinkedIn presenceModerate
Domain Rating (backlinks)~0.266 (weak)
Only 11% of domains are cited by both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews for the same query — platform-specific optimization is essential.

品牌提及与AI可见性的相关性是反向链接的3倍。 (Ahrefs 2025年12月针对75000个品牌的研究)
信号与AI引用的相关性
YouTube提及~0.737(最强)
Reddit提及
Wikipedia收录
LinkedIn曝光中等
域名评级(反向链接)~0.266(弱)
仅11%的域名会在同一查询下同时被ChatGPT和Google AI Overviews引用——平台专属优化至关重要。

GEO Analysis Criteria (Updated)

GEO分析标准(更新版)

1. Citability Score (25%)

1. 可引用性评分(25%)

Optimal passage length: 134-167 words for AI citation.
Strong signals:
  • Clear, quotable sentences with specific facts/statistics
  • Self-contained answer blocks (can be extracted without context)
  • Direct answer in first 40-60 words of section
  • Claims attributed with specific sources
  • Definitions following "X is..." or "X refers to..." patterns
  • Unique data points not found elsewhere
Weak signals:
  • Vague, general statements
  • Opinion without evidence
  • Buried conclusions
  • No specific data points
AI引用的最佳段落长度:134-167词
强信号:
  • 包含具体事实/数据、清晰可引用的句子
  • 独立完整的回答模块(无需上下文即可提取)
  • 段落前40-60词给出直接答案
  • 主张附带具体来源标注
  • 采用“X是……”或“X指的是……”格式的定义
  • 独有的、未在其他地方出现的数据点
弱信号:
  • 模糊、笼统的表述
  • 无证据支撑的观点
  • 结论被隐藏
  • 无具体数据点

2. Structural Readability (20%)

2. 结构可读性(20%)

92% of AI Overview citations come from top-10 ranking pages, but 47% come from pages ranking below position 5 — demonstrating different selection logic.
Strong signals:
  • Clean H1→H2→H3 heading hierarchy
  • Question-based headings (matches query patterns)
  • Short paragraphs (2-4 sentences)
  • Tables for comparative data
  • Ordered/unordered lists for step-by-step or multi-item content
  • FAQ sections with clear Q&A format
Weak signals:
  • Wall of text with no structure
  • Inconsistent heading hierarchy
  • No lists or tables
  • Information buried in paragraphs
92%的AI Overviews引用来自排名前10的页面,但47%来自排名5名之后的页面——这表明AI的内容选择逻辑与传统搜索不同。
强信号:
  • 清晰的H1→H2→H3标题层级
  • 基于问题的标题(匹配查询模式)
  • 短段落(2-4句)
  • 用于对比数据的表格
  • 用于步骤说明或多内容项的有序/无序列表
  • 采用清晰问答格式的FAQ板块
弱信号:
  • 无结构的大段文字
  • 不一致的标题层级
  • 无列表或表格
  • 信息被埋在段落中

3. Multi-Modal Content (15%)

3. 多模态内容(15%)

Content with multi-modal elements sees 156% higher selection rates.
Check for:
  • Text + relevant images
  • Video content (embedded or linked)
  • Infographics and charts
  • Interactive elements (calculators, tools)
  • Structured data supporting media
包含多模态元素的内容被AI选中的概率高出156%
检查要点:
  • 文字+相关图片
  • 嵌入或链接的视频内容
  • 信息图和图表
  • 交互元素(计算器、工具)
  • 支持媒体的结构化数据

4. Authority & Brand Signals (20%)

4. 权威性与品牌信号(20%)

Strong signals:
  • Author byline with credentials
  • Publication date and last-updated date
  • Citations to primary sources (studies, official docs, data)
  • Organization credentials and affiliations
  • Expert quotes with attribution
  • Entity presence in Wikipedia, Wikidata
  • Mentions on Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn
Weak signals:
  • Anonymous authorship
  • No dates
  • No sources cited
  • No brand presence across platforms
强信号:
  • 带有资质说明的作者署名
  • 发布日期和最后更新日期
  • 引用一手来源(研究、官方文档、数据)
  • 机构资质与关联信息
  • 带署名的专家引用
  • 在Wikipedia、Wikidata中的实体收录
  • 在Reddit、YouTube、LinkedIn上的提及
弱信号:
  • 匿名作者
  • 无日期标注
  • 无来源引用
  • 跨平台无品牌曝光

5. Technical Accessibility (20%)

5. 技术可访问性(20%)

AI crawlers do NOT execute JavaScript — server-side rendering is critical.
Check for:
  • Server-side rendering (SSR) vs client-only content
  • AI crawler access in robots.txt
  • llms.txt file presence and configuration
  • RSL 1.0 licensing terms

AI爬虫不执行JavaScript——服务端渲染至关重要。
检查要点:
  • 服务端渲染(SSR)vs 纯客户端内容
  • robots.txt中AI爬虫的访问权限
  • llms.txt文件的存在与配置
  • RSL 1.0许可条款

AI Crawler Detection

AI爬虫检测

Check
robots.txt
for these AI crawlers:
CrawlerOwnerPurpose
GPTBotOpenAIChatGPT web search
OAI-SearchBotOpenAIOpenAI search features
ChatGPT-UserOpenAIChatGPT browsing
ClaudeBotAnthropicClaude web features
PerplexityBotPerplexityPerplexity AI search
CCBotCommon CrawlTraining data (often blocked)
anthropic-aiAnthropicClaude training
BytespiderByteDanceTikTok/Douyin AI
cohere-aiCohereCohere models
Recommendation: Allow GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot for AI search visibility. Block CCBot and training crawlers if desired.

在robots.txt中检查以下AI爬虫:
爬虫名称所属方用途
GPTBotOpenAIChatGPT网页搜索
OAI-SearchBotOpenAIOpenAI搜索功能
ChatGPT-UserOpenAIChatGPT浏览功能
ClaudeBotAnthropicClaude网页功能
PerplexityBotPerplexityPerplexity AI搜索
CCBotCommon Crawl训练数据抓取(通常被拦截)
anthropic-aiAnthropicClaude模型训练
BytespiderByteDanceTikTok/Douyin AI
cohere-aiCohereCohere模型训练
建议: 允许GPTBot、OAI-SearchBot、ClaudeBot、PerplexityBot以提升AI搜索可见性。如需保护数据,可拦截CCBot及其他训练类爬虫。

llms.txt Standard

llms.txt标准

The emerging llms.txt standard provides AI crawlers with structured content guidance.
Location:
/llms.txt
(root of domain)
Format:
undefined
新兴的llms.txt标准为AI爬虫提供结构化的内容指引。
存放位置: 域名根目录下的
/llms.txt
格式:
undefined

Title of site

网站标题

Brief description
简短描述

Main sections

主要板块

  • Page title: Description
  • Another page: Description
  • 页面标题: 描述
  • 另一页面: 描述

Optional: Key facts

可选:关键事实

  • Fact 1
  • Fact 2

**Check for:**
- Presence of `/llms.txt`
- Structured content guidance
- Key page highlights
- Contact/authority information

---
  • 事实1
  • 事实2

**检查要点:**
- `/llms.txt`文件是否存在
- 是否包含结构化内容指引
- 是否突出关键页面
- 是否包含联系/权威性信息

---

RSL 1.0 (Really Simple Licensing)

RSL 1.0(简易许可协议)

New standard (December 2025) for machine-readable AI licensing terms.
Backed by: Reddit, Yahoo, Medium, Quora, Cloudflare, Akamai, Creative Commons
Check for: RSL implementation and appropriate licensing terms.

2025年12月推出的新标准,用于机器可读的AI许可条款。
支持方: Reddit、Yahoo、Medium、Quora、Cloudflare、Akamai、Creative Commons
检查要点: RSL协议的实施情况及许可条款是否恰当。

Platform-Specific Optimization

平台专属优化

PlatformKey Citation SourcesOptimization Focus
Google AI OverviewsTop-10 ranking pages (92%)Traditional SEO + passage optimization
ChatGPTWikipedia (47.9%), Reddit (11.3%)Entity presence, authoritative sources
PerplexityReddit (46.7%), WikipediaCommunity validation, discussions
Bing CopilotBing index, authoritative sitesBing SEO, IndexNow

平台主要引用来源优化重点
Google AI Overviews排名前10的页面(92%)传统SEO+段落优化
ChatGPTWikipedia(47.9%)、Reddit(11.3%)实体收录、权威来源
PerplexityReddit(46.7%)、Wikipedia社区验证、讨论内容
Bing CopilotBing索引、权威站点Bing SEO、IndexNow

Output

输出成果

Generate
GEO-ANALYSIS.md
with:
  1. GEO Readiness Score: XX/100
  2. Platform breakdown (Google AIO, ChatGPT, Perplexity scores)
  3. AI Crawler Access Status (which crawlers allowed/blocked)
  4. llms.txt Status (present, missing, recommendations)
  5. Brand Mention Analysis (presence on Wikipedia, Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn)
  6. Passage-Level Citability (optimal 134-167 word blocks identified)
  7. Server-Side Rendering Check (JavaScript dependency analysis)
  8. Top 5 Highest-Impact Changes
  9. Schema Recommendations (for AI discoverability)
  10. Content Reformatting Suggestions (specific passages to rewrite)

生成
GEO-ANALYSIS.md
文件,包含:
  1. GEO就绪度评分:XX/100
  2. 平台细分评分(Google AIO、ChatGPT、Perplexity各自得分)
  3. AI爬虫访问状态(允许/拦截的爬虫列表)
  4. llms.txt状态(存在、缺失、优化建议)
  5. 品牌提及分析(在Wikipedia、Reddit、YouTube、LinkedIn上的曝光情况)
  6. 段落级可引用性(识别出的134-167词最佳段落)
  7. 服务端渲染检查(JavaScript依赖分析)
  8. Top 5高影响优化建议
  9. Schema推荐(提升AI可发现性)
  10. 内容重排建议(需改写的具体段落)

Quick Wins

快速优化项

  1. Add "What is [topic]?" definition in first 60 words
  2. Create 134-167 word self-contained answer blocks
  3. Add question-based H2/H3 headings
  4. Include specific statistics with sources
  5. Add publication/update dates
  6. Implement Person schema for authors
  7. Allow key AI crawlers in robots.txt
  1. 在前60词中添加“什么是[主题]?”的定义
  2. 创建134-167词的独立完整回答模块
  3. 添加基于问题的H2/H3标题
  4. 包含带来源的具体数据
  5. 添加发布/更新日期
  6. 为作者实现Person schema
  7. 在robots.txt中允许核心AI爬虫访问

Medium Effort

中等难度优化项

  1. Create
    /llms.txt
    file
  2. Add author bio with credentials + Wikipedia/LinkedIn links
  3. Ensure server-side rendering for key content
  4. Build entity presence on Reddit, YouTube
  5. Add comparison tables with data
  6. Implement FAQ sections (structured, not schema for commercial sites)
  1. 创建
    /llms.txt
    文件
  2. 添加带资质的作者简介及Wikipedia/LinkedIn链接
  3. 确保核心内容采用服务端渲染
  4. 在Reddit、YouTube上建立品牌实体曝光
  5. 添加带数据的对比表格
  6. 新增FAQ板块(结构化,商业站点无需添加FAQ schema)

High Impact

高影响优化项

  1. Create original research/surveys (unique citability)
  2. Build Wikipedia presence for brand/key people
  3. Establish YouTube channel with content mentions
  4. Implement comprehensive entity linking (sameAs across platforms)
  5. Develop unique tools or calculators
  1. 开展原创研究/调研(提升独家可引用性)
  2. 为品牌/核心人物建立Wikipedia收录
  3. 创建YouTube频道并植入品牌提及
  4. 实现全面的实体链接(跨平台sameAs关联)
  5. 开发独家工具或计算器