Loading...
Loading...
Found 12 Skills
Structural feedback on a legal writing draft (memo, brief, paper, exam essay) — organization, analysis depth, clarity, citation form. NEVER rewrites the draft. Use when the user says "feedback on my memo", "read my draft", or "critique my brief".
Structured scholarly-work evaluation for papers, proposals, literature reviews, methods sections, evidence quality, citation support, and research-writing feedback.
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
Use when "writing articles", "blog posts", "content creation", "research writing", "technical writing", or asking about "outlining", "citations", "improving hooks", "writing feedback"
Adversarial reading methodology for narrative fiction — find what doesn't work, not confirm what does. Focus-area driven with dedicated resources per area. Use when reviewing drafts, evaluating prose quality, or assessing changes at any stage.
This skill should be used when the user asks for efficient communication, task reports, file-operation summaries, research discussion, study-note synthesis, planning, writing feedback, or responses that need conclusion-first structure, concrete evidence, risk disclosure, and useful next steps.
Advisory copy-edit of prose — reports grammar, logic and flow issues as suggestions without rewriting the text. Use when asked to proofread or copy-edit an article, email, doc or post, or 'проверь грамматику', and the author wants to keep control of the wording. Do not use for removing AI voice and markers (awesome-humanize-en) or for rewriting and de-bloating Markdown in place (awesome-document-style).
Review a draft for big-picture issues in argument, structure, stakes, evidence, and payoff. Use when a piece needs developmental editing, a top-level diagnosis, or substantial restructuring before sentence polish.
Reads your writing from a loving, supportive, but not-quite-getting-it perspective. Surfaces where you've lost the general reader.
Review copy as an intended reader encountering it for the first time, with no access to the writer's unstated context. Identify confusing language, missing setup, assumed knowledge, broken expectations, trust-eroding or off-putting moments, and points where the reader may stop. Use for cold reads, fresh-eyes reviews, first-time-reader perspectives, reader-journey checks, or feedback on what feels confusing, missing, alienating, or hard to follow.
Reads your writing through the meanest, least-charitable lens. Challenges every claim, questions every assumption, pokes holes in the logic. Use for later drafts when you want hard feedback.
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Use when the user wants to write blog posts, articles, newsletters, tutorials, case studies, thought leadership pieces, or any long-form content that benefits from research and structured feedback.