Loading...
Loading...
Found 6 Skills
Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.
Audit an existing test suite for anti-patterns — tautological mock round-trips, weak assertions (toBeDefined / assertNotNull), implementation coupling, flaky timing, snapshot rubber-stamping, and tests claiming guarantees they cannot provide — and report a keep / tighten / rewrite / delete verdict per test.
Test suite audit coordinator (L2). Delegates to 5 workers (Business Logic, E2E, Value, Coverage, Isolation). Aggregates results, creates Linear task in Epic 0.
Deep formal test smell audit based on academic research taxonomy (testsmells.org). Detects 19 categorized smell types — conditional logic, mystery guests, sensitive equality, eager tests, and more — with calibrated severity and research-backed remediation. Use for comprehensive test suite health assessments. For a quick pragmatic review, use test-anti-patterns instead. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), evaluating assertion quality specifically (use assertion-quality), or finding test duplication and boilerplate (use exp-test-maintainability).
Audit and harden a repository test suite so tests carry their weight. Use when the user asks whether tests are useful, flaky, duplicated, slow, under-covering critical behavior, missing contract/regression coverage, or when a codebase needs a test strategy before major refactors, releases, security work, or production hardening.
Audit REA CI and test suites for correctness, fixture drift, false passes, and measured performance; use for suite or workflow investigations and efficiency changes, rather than ordinary feature testing or a single test failure.