Loading...
Loading...
Found 140 Skills
Skill for researching best practices. Triggered when you need to understand methodologies, tools, and best practices in a specific field. Trigger words: research, learn about, what methods are there, best practices.
[Hyper] Optimize an existing Codex skill through baseline-first experiments, binary evals, optional guards, and one-mutation-at-a-time iteration. Use for skill autoresearch, measured trigger/workflow improvement, self-optimizing a skill, benchmarking skill changes, or resuming skill experiment artifacts.
Explore and analyze GitHub repositories related to a research topic. Reads deep-research output, discovers repos from multiple sources, deeply analyzes code, and produces integration blueprints.
AI-assisted academic research workflows for literature review, paper writing, peer review, and research pipelines
Self-directed iterative improvement system for Codex that cycles through modify, verify, retain/discard indefinitely
13 deep research & systematic reviews skills. Trigger: systematic reviews, multi-source synthesis, comprehensive literature surveys. Design: multi-step research protocols with quality assessment and evidence grading.
Convert a completed paper into presentation slides (Beamer LaTeX) or poster. Extract key figures, tables, equations, and create a narrative flow for oral presentation. Identified gap in existing tools — designed from best practices.
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.
Debug experiment code with structured error analysis. Categorize errors, apply targeted fixes with retry logic, and use reflection to prevent recurring issues. Use when experiment code fails or produces incorrect results.
Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.4: LaTeX output formatting hardening — mandatory apa7 class, text justification fix, table column width formula, bilingual abstract centering, standardized font stack, PDF must compile from LaTeX. Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.
Generate academic research proposals for PhD applications. Use when user asks to "write a research proposal", "create PhD proposal", "generate research plan", "撰写研究计划", "写博士申请", "doctoral proposal", or mentions specific research topics for PhD application. Supports STEM, humanities, and social sciences with field-specific adaptations. Follows Nature Reviews-style academic writing conventions. Supports both English and Chinese output based on user preference.
Perform common Git operations safely with sandbox-aware failure handling. Use whenever the user wants to inspect or modify git state, especially for cherry-pick, merge, rebase, commit, branch, stash, or worktree workflows. Always use this skill when the user mentions a Git failure, conflict, cherry-pick, merge issue, worktree, branch checkout problem, lock file, permission denied, operation not permitted, or any case where a sandboxed agent might confuse an environment restriction with a real code conflict. Be proactive: if the task smells like Git state or Git write behavior, use this skill even if the user did not explicitly ask for a 'Git' workflow.