Loading...
Loading...
Found 7 Skills
You MUST use this before any creative work — creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements, and design before implementation.
Conducts structured interviews to derive technical requirements from business requirements. Requires completed business-requirements.yaml as input. Asks targeted technical questions about architecture, technology stack, data model, APIs, security, testing, and deployment. Generates technical-requirements.yaml output.
Transform raw brain dumps (dictated freestyle) into structured implementation artifacts. Use when user has messy ideas, scattered thoughts, or dictated stream-of-consciousness about something they want to build. Produces contracts and implementation specs written to ./docs/ideation/{project-name}/.
Use before any non-instant feature work, refactor, behavior change, or requirements-shaping conversation where user intent is not yet locked. Extracts and confirms the decisions that planning will depend on, especially when the user knows what they want but has not fully thought through edge cases, scope boundaries, or expected behavior. Output is CONTEXT.md.
Use quando o usuário quer transformar uma captura de `specs/inbox/`, uma oportunidade, um problema ou um item existente em backlog pronto para especificação, inclusive por transição automática. Pesquisa duplicatas e referências, cria ou atualiza `specs/backlog/`, faz perguntas adaptativas, aplica o MCR-10 e produz um brief testável. Para apenas guardar um texto sem perguntas use specsfy-01-inbox; não use para escrever spec.md, tarefas, testes ou implementação.
Full Lifecycle Management of Issue Pool (Development Paradigm v1 Planning Phase). The core is an issue-driven process: users throw in ideas casually, and you turn vague issues into actionable tasks—what you deliver is "problem definition", not "solution implementation"; the carrier is a single markdown file named ISSUES.md at the root of the repository, without introducing kanban or new formats. Five actions: Record (add original content to the pool + relevance check), Merge (merge homogeneous requirements), Break Down (discuss and decompose, guide users to reveal the real needs behind the proposed solutions), Transfer (deliver outputs), Pending (if the issue is still vague after two rounds of discussion, record the bottlenecks and put it back into the pool, and avoid making fake plans to wrap up). The only criterion for judging during Transfer is "whether it can be delivered in one version": If yes → simple task, write a paragraph plus 3~5 acceptance criteria under the pool entry; If no → complex plan, place it in docs/plan/ and write the framework plan content following the seven steps in references/plan-writing.md (explain "why to do it / what constitutes completion / what steps to take", without involving fields or interfaces), the end must remain vague, and break down the next batch only after delivering one batch. When users say "record an issue", "add/summarize issues", "break down an issue / decompose"
Explore user intent, requirements, and design options through collaborative dialogue before implementation. Use before building new features, components, or systems — whenever the user describes something to build and design decisions are involved. Triggers: "brainstorm", "help me design", "think through the requirements", "头脑风暴", "设计方案", "梳理需求". Not for bug fixes, config changes, or tasks with an obvious implementation path.