Loading...
Loading...
Found 29 Skills
Stage 2 code quality review. Triggers: 'quality review', 'check code quality', or /review stage 2. Requires spec-review to have passed first. Checks SOLID, DRY, security, and test quality. Do NOT use for spec compliance — use spec-review instead.
This skill should be used when the user asks to review, proofread, check, or evaluate content. It provides comprehensive text review (grammar, logic, compliance) and version evaluation (A/B testing, comparison analysis). Text review automatically adds AI disclaimer at the end.
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze skill quality", "evaluate this skill", "review skill quality", "check my skill", or "generate quality report". Evaluates local skills across description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity.
Checklist covering accuracy, style, accessibility, and localization requirements for documentation releases.
Assess documentation quality across readability, consistency, audience fit, and prose clarity. Produces a scored review with actionable findings. This skill should be used before releases, during doc reviews, or when documentation feels unclear or inconsistent.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "apply skill improvements", "update skill from plan", "execute improvement plan", "fix skill issues", "implement skill recommendations", or mentions applying improvements from quality review reports. Reads improvement-plan-{name}.md files generated by skill-quality-reviewer and intelligently merges and executes the suggested changes to improve Claude Skills quality.
Stage 1 spec compliance review. Triggers: /review stage 1. Verifies implementation matches design specification — functional completeness, TDD compliance, and test coverage. Do NOT use for code quality checks — use quality-review instead. Do NOT use for debugging.
一个全面、结构化的特性开发工作流程，包含代码库探索、架构设计、质量审查和实现等专门阶段。在构建需要以下条件的新特性时使用：（1）在做出更改之前了解现有代码库，（2）通过系统性的提问澄清模糊的需求，（3）在实现之前设计周到的架构，（4）通过多维度的代码审查确保质量。非常适合涉及多个文件、需要架构决策、包含复杂集成或需求有些不明确的功能特性。
Pre-commit code quality review workflow. Use before committing changes to verify code quality, security, testing coverage, and adherence to project conventions. Supports both automated checking and interactive review modes.
Review Playwright tests for quality. Use when user says "review tests", "check test quality", "audit tests", "improve tests", "test code review", or "playwright best practices check".
Performs comprehensive codebase audit checking architecture, tech debt, security vulnerabilities, test coverage, documentation, dependencies, and maintainability. Use when auditing a project, assessing codebase health, running security scans, checking for vulnerabilities, reviewing code quality, analyzing tech debt, or asked to audit/analyze the entire codebase.