Loading...
Loading...
Found 26 Skills
Auto-assembles review panel using deterministic rules, dispatches agents against plan file, collects verdicts.
[Planning] Self-review plan for validity, correctness, and best practices
Use when the user says "/plan-review", "plan review", or "PRD review" and provides a plan file path that needs critical review and iterative refinement with Codex.
Inline adversarial plan review — 3 sequential checks (Feasibility, Completeness, Scope & Alignment) performed by the calling LLM in its own context. No subagents spawned. Call after saving a plan. Returns GATE_PASS or GATE_FAIL with blocking issues.
Carmack-level plan review via RepoPrompt or Codex. Use when reviewing Flow epic specs or design docs. Triggers on /flow-next:plan-review.
CEO/Founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Adapted from gstack/plan-ceo-review (Garry Tan, MIT license).
Debate implementation plans between Claude Code and Codex CLI. After Claude Code creates a plan, invoke this skill to have Codex review it. Both AIs debate through multiple rounds until reaching full consensus before implementation begins.
Use when another skill or agent needs a review panel assembled, retained, or converged — invoked by /review-loop, /plan-review, and code-reviewer, not directly by users.
Use when reviewing a plan before implementation begins. Not for autonomous plan analysis — use plan-review agent instead. Challenges scope, walks through architecture/quality/tests/performance interactively with mandatory user checkpoints and opinionated recommendations.
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
Use when the user asks to run Gemini CLI for code review, plan review, or big context (>200k) processing. Ideal for comprehensive analysis requiring large context windows. Uses Gemini 3 Pro by default for state-of-the-art reasoning and coding.
Advisory plan review - validates plan correctness and identifies gaps before implementation. Works on any task with research and plan sections.