Loading...
Loading...
Found 57 Skills
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
peer-review a plan, design, or implementation, find the one critical risk, list other gaps, propose a fix for the critical risk, and update the plan. Triggers: peer review a plan, review an implementation, assess a design, check a proposal for gaps.
Simulate peer review by constructing reviewer personas from Zotero sources. Identifies relevant perspectives, retrieves full texts, builds reviewer profiles, and generates focused reviews on theory/methods and findings.
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.
Educator peer review management for Canvas LMS. Tracks completion rates, analyzes comment quality, flags problematic reviews, sends targeted reminders, and generates instructor-ready reports. Trigger phrases include "peer review status", "how are peer reviews going", "who hasn't reviewed", "review quality", or any peer review follow-up task.
Simulate a tough but constructive peer review of an AI research artifact. Use when the user asks for a review, critique, feedback on a paper or draft, or wants to identify weaknesses before submission.
Request peer review with proper context and preparation. Structures review requests with clear description of changes and testing status.
Use when reviewing academic papers, proposals, experiments, claims, related work, novelty, methodology, or manuscripts as a severe but fair peer reviewer before submission.
You must use this when critiquing academic manuscripts, evaluating methodological rigor, or providing structured reviewer feedback.
Get a second opinion from Gemini on code, architecture, debugging, or security. Uses gemini-coach CLI with AI-to-AI prompting for clear, actionable analysis. Trigger with 'ask gemini', 'gemini review', 'second opinion', 'peer review', or 'consult gemini'.
Expert knowledge of academic writing standards for peer-reviewed papers, including citation integrity, style compliance, clarity, and scientific writing best practices. Use when reviewing or editing academic manuscripts, papers, or research documentation.
Chinese-first research paper writing, revision, polishing, section drafting, rebuttal, peer-review response, thesis prose improvement, and manuscript argument planning. Use when the user asks to write or revise论文正文, abstracts, introductions, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, related work, responses to reviewers, LaTeX/Overleaf text, or academic prose. Preserve formulas, English paper titles, terms, citations, and measured results.