Loading...
Loading...
Found 10 Skills
Revise papers based on reviewer feedback. Map reviewer concerns to specific sections, apply targeted edits, run additional experiments if needed, and verify improvements. Use after receiving peer review with revision requests.
Expert guidance for writing high-quality academic and research papers. Use when the user wants to write, structure, revise, or improve academic papers, research articles, conference papers, or technical reports. Provides comprehensive support for all stages from planning to final polish.
Write point-by-point rebuttals to reviewer comments. Extract concerns from reviews, generate evidence-based responses, and format as a structured rebuttal document. Use after receiving peer review feedback.
Mechanize Pattern 15 — the seven-pass adversarial review protocol for academic manuscripts. Spawns 7 forked subagents in parallel (abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, citations), then synthesizes a prioritized revision checklist. Use for submission-ready or R&R-stage papers where single-pass review isn't enough.
Chinese-first research paper writing, revision, polishing, section drafting, rebuttal, peer-review response, thesis prose improvement, and manuscript argument planning. Use when the user asks to write or revise论文正文, abstracts, introductions, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, related work, responses to reviewers, LaTeX/Overleaf text, or academic prose. Preserve formulas, English paper titles, terms, citations, and measured results.
Write, revise, and polish SCI journal papers based on LaTeX paper projects. Defaults to AI autonomous mode, and also supports human-machine collaboration where only review plans are output; provides author-stylized writing, numerical fact verification, multi-round logical tree review, and a closed-loop PDF/Word rendering workflow. ⚠️ Not applicable: Format/style parameter-only modifications, pure reference management, image processing, non-paper writing tasks.
Runs a two-pass paper reflection loop with a Researcher pass and a Writer pass. Use when the user asks to reflect on a paper, improve a draft, run a research-agent and writer-agent review, critique the paper before submission, find both technical and writing issues, or produce a revision plan. The Researcher pass checks claims, citations, evidence, venue fit, missing related work, and reviewer risk; the Writer pass checks framing, structure, abstract, related work, prose, tables/figures, and response clarity. Outputs a merged action plan with evidence, priority, owner, and next skill to run.
Drafts or revises a publication-ready research paper from RESEARCH.md, producing paper.md and refs.bib. Builds a clear claim-evidence narrative, writes in professional academic style, marks ungrounded claims [UNGROUNDED] and unverified citations [UNVERIFIED] inline, then auto-invokes review. Trigger phrases: "write paper", "draft paper", "revise paper", "start writing".
Use when the user wants to write, structure, or revise academic paper sections, improve notation consistency, or refine figures and tables. Triggers on phrases like "write the abstract", "structure the methods", "improve this section", "notation consistency", "figure refinement", or "paper structure".
Prevents defensive writing throughout the entire paper-writing, revision, condensing, and experiment-organization workflow. Treats a paper as an academic press release rather than a project summary, experiment log, or self-censorship report: identifies the work's most publishable value and builds the most favorable, complete, and persuasive narrative around it. Avoids giving equal weight to every aspect, volunteering weaknesses, writing experiments as a chronological log, or attacking the work on the reviewers' behalf. Trigger terms: paper polishing, paper revision, writing an abstract, writing an introduction, writing a conclusion, condensing a paper, rebuttal, responding to reviewer comments, organizing experiments, AI-sounding papers, defensive writing, feeling insecure.