Loading...
Loading...
Found 6 Skills
Analyze propositions from multiple expert perspectives. Dynamically generates 4-6 relevant expert roles, then performs validation, comprehensive analysis, or debate-style examination. Use when user wants to examine ideas critically, find blindspots, or explore different viewpoints on a topic.
Adopt multiple expert personas sequentially for complex problem analysis from diverse perspectives. Single-agent only — do NOT spawn sub-agents.
Multi-perspective adversarial review. 4 Agents are spawned in parallel (full mode), each identifying issues from different perspectives, and the main thread makes a comprehensive ruling. Trigger methods: /story-review, /审查, "审查一下", "帮我审一下"
Use when facing hard architectural decisions, multiple valid approaches exist, need diverse perspectives before committing, or want M-of-N synthesis on complex problems
Multi-perspective deliberation on a question. Use when the user says "get perspectives on", "multiple viewpoints", "council on this", "devil's advocate", "stress test this idea", "red team this", "poke holes in", "second opinion on", "what am I missing", or wants multi-perspective analysis of a decision, design, or strategy.
Run a structured multi-perspective council on a hard decision, design choice, debugging question, strategy problem, or tradeoff. Use when the user wants multiple viewpoints, explicit cross-examination, and a compact final verdict.