Loading...
Loading...
Found 9 Skills
Audit MEMORY.md against the memory discipline — oversized sections, settled multi-session patterns that belong in knowledge/concepts/, stacked chronicle blocks, stale entries. Produces a move plan as a table for approval, then executes the approved moves atomically. Use when the SessionStart hook reports a tripped cap, when PreCompact blocks on an oversized cache, or when the user says "/memory-kit:memory-audit", "audit memory", "проверь память", "почисти память". Refuses only when no cap is tripped AND no settled-pattern candidate exists.
Periodic evidence-based self-audit of the whole agent system — the orchestrator, its docs/SSOTs, rules, memory, subagents, tools, infra and the work it claims to have delivered — followed by immediate cheap-safe fixes and a ranked backlog. Use when the user says 'аудит системы', 'проверь себя', 'самопроверка', 'system audit', 'audit yourself', 'health check', 'что у нас накопилось', 'система раздулась', 'проверь что работает а что на бумаге', 'gap-анализ', 'что удалить', or on cadence triggers (every ~10 sessions, before a milestone, after a big refactor, when memory hits its caps, when onboarding this repo to a new agent). Seven lenses: delivery reality · knowledge drift · operational layer · layer telemetry (did it ever fire) · tools & infra · domain gaps · anti-bloat subtraction. Not for reviewing a single diff (use a diff-review pass) and not for probing a running product (use /memory-kit:qa-sweep).
Adopt the Memory Kit in THIS repository — scaffold the memory layers, decide how the kit coexists with Claude Code's native auto memory, and install safe permission rails. Use when the user says "/memory-kit:setup", "set up the memory kit", "adopt the kit here", "настрой кит", or when a session starts in a repo where the kit plugin is installed but no .claude/memory/MEMORY.md exists.
Interactive walkthrough of the Memory Kit system using the user's actual project files. Use when the user says "/memory-kit:tour", "give me a tour", "покажи как это работает", or right after /memory-kit:setup.
End-of-session ritual — audit today's patterns against accumulated memory, propose promotions, refresh MEMORY.md, and write the session handoff. Use when the user says "/memory-kit:close-session", "закрой сессию", "закрываем", "we're done for today", "wrap up".
Persistent memory system for Claude Code. Two-layer architecture (hot cache + knowledge wiki), safety hooks, /close-day end-of-day synthesis. Zero external dependencies.
Cross-check the agent's own answer with independent reviewers before bringing it to the user. Use when the user says 'second opinion', 'sanity check', 'cross-check', 'am I missing something', 'stress-test', 'devil's advocate', 'run a full review', 'this is important', 'high-stakes', 'help me choose between', 'critique this', or similar. Three review styles: Devil's Advocate (single critique), Boardroom Debate (parallel multi-reviewer validation), Round-Table (multi-round brainstorm for choosing between paths). Not for factual lookups — use WebSearch for those.
End-of-session adversarial review loop. Assemble the session's work into a role-assigned, self-contained brief, then run independent reviewers in parallel — an isolated code-reader (the idea-validator agent) that reads the ACTUAL files and web-checks technology currency, plus an external-family model if you have one — synthesize where they agree vs diverge, apply the cheap-safe fixes immediately, record a measurable plan for the rest, and CHALLENGE reviewer claims you disagree with (never blind-accept). Use at the close of a substantive coding or design session, when the user says "session review", "review my session", "stress-test this session", or types /session-review. Skip for trivial one-off edits.
Run a multi-lens agent QA sweep of the RUNNING product: spawn `qa` agents (one per lens — user-flow · edge-state · honesty · contract · ux-critique), collect their structured findings, integrator-verify the load-bearing ones, and land verified findings as backlog tickets + a run record in the project's qa/ folder. Use whenever the user asks to QA, test, or probe the product from the user's side — "qa sweep", "test the UI", "walk the flows", "find inconsistencies", "check how this looks to a client" — and proactively after integrating any large UI slice, before a milestone, or when a manual walk found one bug and siblings are likely. Trigger even when the user names only one angle (e.g. "check the API errors") — pick the matching lens subset. NOT for unit testing (your test suite does that) and NOT a replacement for the integrator's own acceptance walk.