Loading...
Loading...
Found 11 Skills
AI-first application patterns, LLM testing, prompt management
Visualize whether skills, rules, and agent definitions are actually followed — auto-generates scenarios at 3 prompt strictness levels, runs agents, classifies behavioral sequences, and reports compliance rates with full tool call timelines
LLM prompt injection playbook. Use when testing AI/LLM applications for direct injection, indirect injection via RAG/browsing, tool abuse, data exfiltration, MCP security risks, and defense bypass techniques.
LLM and AI testing patterns — mock responses, evaluation with DeepEval/RAGAS, structured output validation, and agentic test patterns (generator, healer, planner). Use when testing AI features, validating LLM outputs, or building evaluation pipelines.
LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.
DeepEval evaluation workflow for AI agents and LLM applications. TRIGGER when the user wants to evaluate or improve an AI agent, tool-using workflow, multi-turn chatbot, RAG pipeline, or LLM app; add evals; generate datasets or goldens; use deepeval generate; use deepeval test run; add tracing or @observe; send results to Confident AI; monitor production; run online evals; inspect traces; or iterate on prompts, tools, retrieval, or agent behavior from eval failures. AI agents are the primary use case. Covers Python SDK, pytest eval suites, CLI generation, tracing, Confident AI reporting, and agent-driven improvement loops. DO NOT TRIGGER for unrelated generic pytest, non-AI test setup, or non-DeepEval observability work unless the user asks to compare or migrate to DeepEval.
Redirect — testing-patterns was split into 5 focused sub-skills. Use when looking for testing-patterns, writing tests, or test automation. Redirects to testing-unit, testing-e2e, testing-integration, testing-llm, or testing-perf.
Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.
Use when creating, running, debugging, or documenting skill-optimizer workbench evals; working with agent skill cases, suites, graders, traces, Docker workspaces, OpenRouter model matrices, or the skill-optimizer SDK/CLI.
External NeMo-RL end-to-end validation workflow for Megatron-Bridge model/provider changes, including downstream compatibility checks, external RL lifecycle behavior, Megatron policy setup, HF import/export, checkpoint/resume, non-colocated vLLM refit, delta weight transfer, optional LoRA/generation variants, and questions such as "does this model work in NeMo-RL", "run NeMo-RL e2e", or "external RL loop validation". Covers running NeMo-RL Megatron policy jobs from a Bridge checkout, choosing GRPO/SFT/checkpoint/non-colocated refit variants, setting PYTHONPATH so NeMo-RL imports the local Bridge tree, and reporting pass/fail evidence.
Evaluate, test, and track an AG2 Agent offline. Build a Suite of tasks, run the agent with run_agent, and grade answers with prebuilt scorers (final_answer_matches, tool_called, no_tool_errors, token_budget) or a custom @scorer — including the agent_judge LLM judge. Read the RunResult scorecard (pass_rate, score_stats, value_counts), gate it in CI with deterministic TestConfig cassettes, persist to store_dir and diff runs to catch regressions, and grade existing traces with evaluate_traces. Use when the user wants to evaluate, test, grade, or benchmark an agent, build a CI or regression gate, or score correctness, tool use, cost, or quality. To compare builds head-to-head or on a leaderboard, see ag2-eval-comparison.