Loading...
Loading...
Found 44 Skills
Diagnoses and fixes flaky tests by identifying root causes (timing issues, shared state, randomness, network dependencies) and provides stabilization strategies. Use for "flaky tests", "test stability", "intermittent failures", or "test debugging".
Fixes flaky tests by analyzing failure patterns from Tuist test insights, identifying root causes, and applying targeted corrections. Can be invoked with a specific test case URL (e.g. `https://tuist.dev/{account}/{project}/tests/test-cases/{id}`) or without arguments to discover and fix all flaky tests in the project.
Diagnose and fix tests that pass in isolation but fail when run concurrently. Covers shared state isolation and resource conflicts. References condition-based-waiting for timing issues.
Fixes a specific flaky test by analyzing its failure patterns from Tuist, identifying the root cause, and applying a targeted correction. Typically invoked with a Tuist test case URL in the format such as `https://tuist.dev/{account}/{project}/tests/test-cases/{id}`.
Comprehensive testing doctrine for software and AI systems — covers positive patterns, anti-patterns, gates for coding agents writing tests, CI discipline, and an LLM/agent evaluation primer. Use when authoring or reviewing tests, adding mocks, deciding test placement, generating tests via agents, debugging flaky CI, designing eval suites for LLM features, or rebuilding a brittle test suite. Contains 12 positive patterns (selector hierarchy, table-driven, builders, real-system gates), 25 anti-patterns across Brittleness, Flakiness, Mock-misuse, Process, and AI-specific families, 7 mandatory gates for agents writing tests, flaky-test taxonomy with quarantine workflow, contract / property / mutation testing patterns, and an oracle-ladder primer for LLM-as-judge and agent eval. Language-agnostic — pseudo-code only. Don't use for general code review, library-specific debugging unrelated to tests, non-testing CI pipeline design, or production observability.
Executes real-user QA sessions through public interfaces using personas, journeys, exploratory charters, test tours, edge-case probes, CFR checks, and browser evidence. Reads qa-report artifacts from <qa-output-path>/qa/ when present, captures issues/screenshots/reports under the same output tree, and classifies bugs by user impact. Use when validating a release candidate, migration, refactor, or user-facing change against production-like behavior. Do not use for AI implementation audits, task-status reconciliation, CI gate runs, integration/security/performance templates, or flaky-test triage; use agent-output-audit for those.
Build Cypress test suites in TypeScript: E2E tests, component tests, custom commands, cy.intercept network control, cy.session login, Cypress Cloud, and CI integration. Covers retry-ability, the command queue, cross-origin flows with cy.origin, and data-driven testing with fixtures. Use when: "write E2E test in Cypress," "Cypress page object / custom command," "cy.," "cy.intercept," "Cypress component test," "Cypress Cloud," "cypress.config.ts." Not for: Playwright suites — use playwright-automation; flaky-test healing or quarantine — use test-reliability; bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — use selector-drift-recovery; Selenium-to-Cypress conversion — use test-migration. Related: playwright-automation, ci-cd-integration, visual-testing, unit-testing, test-reliability.
Design CI/CD pipelines that run test suites. Covers GitHub Actions and GitLab CI templates, parallelism and sharding, artifact management, flaky-test quarantine, test-result publishing, coverage quality gates, OIDC keyless deploy, and copy-paste workflows for Playwright, Jest, and multi-stage pipelines. Use when: "CI/CD," "GitHub Actions," "pipeline," "test in CI," "GitLab CI," "continuous integration," "test automation pipeline," "shard tests in CI." Not for: per-test flaky healing at runtime — use test-reliability; go/no-go release decisions and smoke-test checklists — use release-readiness; test-result dashboards and trend reporting — use qa-metrics. Related: playwright-automation, qa-metrics, test-reliability, coverage-analysis, release-readiness.
Design, implement, and validate Rust tests, including unit, integration, doctest, compile-fail, property, fuzz, benchmark, coverage, async, concurrency, process, daemon, IPC, terminal, platform, and hardware-facing test strategies. Use when users ask for Rust test architecture, flaky-test diagnosis, coverage gates, benchmarks, trybuild, cargo-nextest, real-process tests, or failure-path verification.
Add, fix, or harden tests for the current change, issue, or failing suite. Use when the user says "test it", asks for coverage, regression tests, BDD evidence mapping, flaky-test stabilization, or CI test gaps. Name quality regime A/B/C first — wrong evidence is vibes. Prefer existing runners; if none exists, ask with options via the question tool. Pair with fix-it / diagnose-bug / check-readiness when tests prove a repair or readiness gate.
Risk-based quality engineering test strategy for software delivery. Use when defining or updating test strategy, selecting unit/integration/contract/E2E/performance/security coverage, setting CI quality gates and suite budgets, managing flaky tests and test data, and operationalizing observability-first debugging and release criteria.
Use when CI tests fail on main branch after PR merge, or when investigating flaky test failures in CI environments