Loading...
Loading...
Found 24 Skills
Phase 1 of the feature workflow — Draft a design document for the new feature, which serves as the sole input for subsequent implementation and acceptance. First gather evidence (read architecture docs, review relevant code, grep to prevent term conflicts, check archives), then write a complete first draft in one go (including YAML frontmatter + three-layer structure + test design), submit it to the user for overall review, and iterate until approval. After approval, extract {slug}-checklist.yaml from {slug}-design.md for use in the next two phases. Trigger scenarios: "Start designing the solution", "Write design doc", "Prepare to implement XX", with the prerequisite that you already know what to do, who it's for, and how to define success.
Turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. Use when planning new features, designing architecture, or making significant changes to the codebase.
Collaborative design phase for feature lifecycle: explore requirements, discuss trade-offs, produce design document. Use when starting a new feature that needs design before implementation. Use for "design feature", "let's think through", "explore approaches", or "/feature-design". Do NOT use for simple bug fixes or tasks that don't need design discussion.
One-stop skill for the project architecture center — draft new architecture documents, refresh existing architecture documents, or conduct an architecture health check. Automatically determine the mode based on user input: `new` (draft)/ `update` (refresh to the latest code status)/ `check` (view only, generate issue list). The `check` mode has three sub-goals: consistency within a single feature design, alignment between design and code, and consistency among multiple documents under `easysdd/architecture/`. Single-target rule — only modify one document or check one target at a time. Trigger scenarios: User says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "refresh the architecture directory", "write down the structure of this module", "conduct an architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan match the code?", "are there conflicts among several documents in the architecture folder?", or when it is found in the feature-design / feature-acceptance / implement phase that an architecture action needs to be performed first before proceeding.
Discussion entry when ideas are still vague — first conduct triage through 1-2 rounds of dialogue to determine which downstream process this discussion should eventually go to: if the idea is clear enough, proceed directly to feature-design; if the direction of a small requirement is set, continue the discussion within the feature and document it in `{slug}-brainstorm.md`; if a large requirement cannot fit into a single feature, hand it over to roadmap for decomposition. The role of AI is a thinking partner, not a recorder — dig out the real problem the user wants to solve, proactively evaluate when the user brings a solution, and propose alternative directions when necessary. Trigger scenarios: when the user says "I have an idea that's not clear yet", "Let's brainstorm first", "I want to do something but it's still vague", "Let's talk about this area", "The function direction is still undecided", or when the user comes with a specific solution but wants to hear other ideas first. Bugs (go to issue) and refactoring (go to refactor) are not handled here.
Execute implementation tasks from design documents using markdown checkboxes. Use when (1) implementing features from feature-design-assistant output, (2) resuming interrupted work, (3) batch executing tasks. Triggers on 'start implementation', 'run tasks', 'resume'.
Draft or update requirement documents under `codestable/requirements/` for the project — use **user stories + plain language** to describe a capability's "reason for existence, solution approach, and boundaries", so non-technical readers can quickly understand the highlights of the system. Layered with architecture: requirement is the "problem space" (why this capability is needed), while architecture is the "solution space" (what structure is used to implement it). Two modes: new (draft a new requirement doc from scratch), update (refresh an existing doc based on new materials or implementation changes). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: the user says "fill in a requirement doc", "write down the requirements for this capability", "update the requirements directory", or during the feature-design phase, it is found that there is no corresponding requirement for the capability to be implemented this time.
Organize reusable programming patterns / library usages / technical skills that answer "To do this kind of thing, the correct approach is this" into a prescriptive reference library, which can be retrieved and reused as needed during feature-design and issue-analyze phases. Three types: pattern (design patterns, programming idioms), library (usage and pitfalls of a certain library/framework), technique (specific operation skills / command recipes). Trigger scenarios: When the user says "record a trick", "this usage is worth recording", "tricks", "record library usage", or when a skill worth archiving is discovered during feature-design / issue-analyze phases and actively pushed. Refer to `codestable/reference/system-overview.md` for how to distinguish it from learning / decisions / explore.
One-stop skill for the project architecture center — draft new architecture documents, refresh existing ones, or conduct an architecture health check. Automatically determine the mode based on user input: `new` (draft)/ `update` (refresh to latest code status)/ `check` (review without modification, generate issue list). The `check` mode has three sub-objectives: consistency within a single feature design, alignment between design and code, and consistency among multiple documents under `codestable/architecture/`. Single-target rule — only modify one document or check one target at a time. Trigger scenarios: User says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "refresh the architecture directory", "write down this module structure", "conduct an architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan match the code?", "are there conflicts among several documents in the architecture folder?", or when an architecture action is required before proceeding during the feature-design / feature-acceptance / implement phases.
Resolve implementation ambiguities before planning begins. Two modes: Discussion mode surfaces gray areas with concrete options for greenfield work. Assumptions mode reads the codebase, forms evidence-based opinions, and asks the user to correct only what's wrong (brownfield work). Use for "discuss ambiguities", "resolve gray areas", "clarify before planning", "assumptions mode", "what are the gray areas", "before we plan". Do NOT use for broad design exploration (use feature-design) or for planning itself (use feature-plan).
Break a design document into wave-ordered implementation tasks with domain agent assignments. Use after /feature-design produces a design doc. Use for "plan feature", "break down design", "create tasks", or "/feature-plan". Do NOT use without a design doc or for simple single-task work.
Draft or update requirement documents under `easysdd/requirements/` for the project — describe a capability's "reason for existence, solution approach, and boundaries" using **user stories + plain language**, so non-technical readers can quickly grasp the key highlights of the system. Layered with architecture: requirement is the "problem space" (why this capability is needed), while architecture is the "solution space" (what structure is used to implement it). Two modes: new (draft a new requirement doc from scratch), update (refresh an existing doc based on new materials or implementation changes). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: when the user says "fill in a requirement doc", "write down the requirements for this capability", "update the requirements directory", or when it is found during the feature-design phase that there is no corresponding requirement for the capability to be implemented this time.