Loading...
Loading...
Found 12 Skills
Review tweet drafts in Claude Code against 8 voice rules. Scores 1-10, breaks down every rule, and rewrites anything that scores below 7.
Use when the user needs workflow orchestration such as branching, concurrency, approvals, waiting and resume, runtime stream, restart-safe execution, mixed sync/async function or module orchestration, event-driven fan-out, process-clarity refactors that make stages explicit, performance-oriented refactors that collapse split requests, or explicit draft-review-revise style multi-stage flows. The user does not need to say TriggerFlow explicitly.
Review and send Telegram response drafts, manage follow-ups for unanswered outbound messages. Use when the user says "/tg-responder review", "/tg-responder status", "/tg-responder follow-ups", "check telegram drafts", "review pending messages", "telegram inbox", "who hasn't replied", or "follow up".
Read as a specified first-time reader persona and report the felt experience. Use for skill-only workflows when a draft needs persona-bound reader-response signal instead of analytical critique.
This skill provides the 12 critical story questions for screenplay evaluation. Covers concept, theme, audience reaction, beginning, ending, rising tensions, characters, protagonist, motivation, antagonist, and believability. Use when: evaluating a screenplay draft, identifying story weaknesses, preparing for rewrites, or validating fundamentals before submission.
Eva Brief is an independent entry for commercial brief breakdown. It is only used when users explicitly request to break down brand briefs, brand cooperation requirements, generate commercial constraint cards, check existing commercial drafts against briefs, or migrate the structure of benchmark samples for the same product. It only generates brief analysis, selling point pools, commercial constraint cards, or revision handover materials, and does not directly write complete commercial drafts, titles, openings, or full text; general requests such as "how to write a commercial draft / how to present product selling points / help me create commercial content" should be redirected to Eva's main creation workflow. Trigger methods: /eva-brief, eva-brief, commercial brief, brand brief, brand cooperation requirement, help me break down the brief, create commercial constraint card, check against brief, can this commercial draft be submitted, check commercial draft, commercial sample of the same product, brand reference sample.
Adversarial reading methodology for narrative fiction — find what doesn't work, not confirm what does. Focus-area driven with dedicated resources per area. Use when reviewing drafts, evaluating prose quality, or assessing changes at any stage.
Review and finalize multiple pending drafts in a batch session: read context, edit, or discard.
Review a draft for big-picture issues in argument, structure, stakes, evidence, and payoff. Use when a piece needs developmental editing, a top-level diagnosis, or substantial restructuring before sentence polish.
Adversarial critique of a research draft or paper using an isolated critic context. The critic must have no access to the current conversation history — context isolation, not model identity, is what makes the review independent. Use when a draft is complete or partially complete, after each writing round, or when `write` invokes it automatically. Returns FATAL/MAJOR/MINOR issues, a structured score (0–10), and a PROCEED/REFINE/PIVOT recommendation. Caps at 4 rounds. Trigger phrases: "review paper", "critique draft", "check citations", "adversarial review".
Convene a panel of reviewers to analyze a draft from multiple perspectives, then synthesize their feedback into consensus findings, productive tensions, and prioritized recommendations.
Reads your writing through the meanest, least-charitable lens. Challenges every claim, questions every assumption, pokes holes in the logic. Use for later drafts when you want hard feedback.