Loading...
Loading...
Found 25 Skills
Comprehensive checklist and process for reviewing documentation quality including voice, tone, structure, completeness, and technical accuracy.
Review an Elastic agent skill against official documentation for accuracy, completeness, and coverage gaps. Use when a writer wants to review, audit, or validate a skill from a repository of agent skills.
Remove telltale signs of AI-generated 'slop' writing from README files and documentation. Make your docs sound authentically human.
Review documentation changes for compliance with the Metabase writing style guide. Use when reviewing pull requests, files, or diffs containing documentation markdown files.
Reviews and proofreads blog posts, articles, documentation, communications, emails, and any other write-ups to improve conciseness, legibility, clarity, and tone. Fixes typos, grammar issues, redundancies, run-on sentences, and punctuation errors. Use when the user asks to proofread, review, edit, or improve a piece of writing, or when they share text and ask for feedback, corrections, or a revised version.
Review documentation for quality, clarity, SEO, and technical correctness. Optimized for Docus/Nuxt Content but works with any Markdown documentation. Use when asked to: "review docs", "check documentation", "audit docs", "validate documentation", "improve docs quality", "analyze documentation", "check my docs", "review my documentation pages", "validate MDC syntax", "check for SEO issues", "analyze doc structure". Provides actionable recommendations categorized by priority (Critical, Important, Nice-to-have).
Review a pull request or a branch against the repository's standards — skill frontmatter and body, docs and bilingual pairs, Agent Notes, and scripts — and report blockers separately from suggestions, prioritizing correctness and required behavior over style.
Use before starting implementation - research repository documentation, codebase patterns, and external resources to inform the approach
Comprehensive repository analysis using Explore agents, web search, and Context7 to investigate codebase structure, technology stack, configuration, documentation quality, and provide actionable insights. Use this skill when asked to analyze, audit, investigate, or report on a repository or codebase. | Exploreエージェント、Web検索、Context7を用いた包括的なリポジトリ分析。コードベース構造、技術スタック、設定、ドキュメント品質を調査し、実用的な洞察を提供。リポジトリやコードベースの分析、監査、調査、レポート作成を依頼された場合に使用。
Applies the Diataxis framework to create or improve technical documentation. Use when being asked to write high quality tutorials, how-to guides, reference docs, or explanations, when reviewing documentation quality, or when deciding what type of documentation to create. Helps identify documentation types using the action/cognition and acquisition/application dimensions.
Audit claude-skills repository documentation with systematic 9-phase review: standards compliance, official docs verification via Context7/WebFetch, code examples accuracy, cross-file consistency, and version drift detection. Auto-fixes unambiguous issues with severity classification. Use when: investigating skill issues, major package updates detected (e.g., v1.x → v2.x), skill not verified >90 days, before marketplace submission, or troubleshooting outdated API patterns, contradictory examples, broken links, version drift.
Execute a comprehensive Flutter Project Health Audit. Analyzes tech stack, architecture, state management, testing, code quality, CI/CD, and documentation. Produces a Google Docs-ready report with section scores and weighted overall score. Use when the user asks to audit a Flutter project, run a health check, evaluate project quality, or assess technical debt. Triggers on: 'flutter audit', 'health audit', 'project audit', 'flutter health', 'tech debt assessment', 'project quality check'.