Loading...
Loading...
Found 22 Skills
This skill should be used to refine brainstorm or plan documents before proceeding to the next workflow step. It applies when a brainstorm or plan document exists and the user wants to improve it.
Review legal documents as an experienced attorney. Analyzes contracts, ToS, privacy policies, NDAs, and corporate docs section-by-section. Identifies risks, gaps, and unfavorable terms with specific replacement text for problematic clauses.
[BETA] Stress-test an existing implementation plan and selectively strengthen weak sections with targeted research. Use when a plan needs more confidence around decisions, sequencing, system-wide impact, risks, or verification. Best for Standard or Deep plans, or high-risk topics such as auth, payments, migrations, external APIs, and security. For structural or clarity improvements, prefer document-review instead.
Review contracts for concerning clauses, extract key terms, compare to standard terms, and flag unusual provisions. Use when user needs contract review, legal document analysis, or agreement evaluation.
This skill should be used when the user provides a strategy, plan, or decision document and wants to surface hidden assumptions and blind spots using the Known/Unknown 4-quadrant framework. Trigger on "known unknown", "4분면 분석", "blind spots", "뭘 놓치고 있지", "뭘 모르는지 모르겠어", "전략 점검", "전략 분석", "assumption check", "가정 점검", "quadrant analysis", "what am I missing". Strategy-level blind spot analysis with hypothesis-driven questioning. For requirement clarification use vague; for content-vs-form reframing use metamedium.
验证研究报告中所有声明的引用准确性、来源质量和格式规范性。确保每个事实性声明都有可验证的来源，并提供来源质量评级。当最终确定研究报告、审查他人研究、发布或分享研究之前使用此技能。
Generate technical design documents using a standard template and save them to a group Yuque knowledge base. For group use — stores designs in group repos with review workflow. Requires group Token.
Review requirements or plan documents using parallel persona agents that surface role-specific issues. Use when a requirements document or plan document exists and the user wants to improve it.
Interactive Intent approval. Review sections and mark status (locked/reviewed/draft). Use /intent-review <path> to review a specific file, or /intent-review to review Intent in current directory.
Review and annotate documents/contracts — output annotated docx with comments or tracked changes. Core: contract review (risk clauses, rights imbalance, vague wording, missing clauses); also general document review (grammar, logic, formatting). 批阅文档/合同 — 审阅任意文档并以批注或修订模式输出带标注的 docx。 核心场景：合同/协议审查（风险条款、权利义务、模糊表述、缺失条款）， 也支持通用文档审阅（语法、逻辑、格式）。 Trigger when: user asks to "审阅", "批阅", "批注", "review", "审查合同", "review contract", "review agreement", "annotate document", "check contract", "合同审查", "文档批注", or provides a document (.docx) for review.
Check the consistency and authenticity risks of citations and references in NSFC proposal text (read-only): Verify the existence of bibkey, format issues such as BibTeX fields and DOI, and generate structured input for the host AI to evaluate item-by-item whether the text expression actually cites the literature; by default, only an audit report is output, and the proposal or .bib file is not directly modified (unless the user explicitly requests it).
Universal context reviewer: delegates arbitrary context (plans, decisions, documents, architecture proposals) to external agents (Codex + Gemini) for independent review with debate protocol. Context always passed via files.