Loading...
Loading...
Found 57 Skills
Benchmarks a competitor's developer relations motion from publicly observable signals - documentation and quickstart quality, open-source repository health, community size and responsiveness, Q&A tag activity, content cadence by format, event presence, hiring signals - and returns a gap plan with a close, ignore or counter verdict per row. Use whenever the user asks for a devrel competitive benchmark, a developer experience comparison, "how do we compare to <competitor> for developers", "what is <competitor> doing in devrel", a community size or content cadence comparison, or a docs comparison against rivals - even if they only say "why do they get more developers". Not for measuring your own program alone - use samber/developer-relations-skills@devrel-metrics.
Designs and runs a recurring developer meetup or user group - purpose and host model, format menu, cadence, a standing speaker pipeline, in-kind venue and food sponsors with their conduct limits, no-show planning, the attendee-to-co-organizer ladder, and a health scorecard. Use whenever someone mentions starting a developer meetup or user group, dying meetup attendance, finding meetup speakers, getting a venue or pizza sponsor, how often to meet, RSVPs who never show, or handing the meetup over - even if they only say "we want to do local events". Covers independent, vendor-backed and company-staffed groups. Not for speaking at a conference - use samber/developer-relations-skills@conference-cfp-submission.
Builds a company's open-source sponsorship portfolio - which projects and maintainers to fund, through which allocation model, at what amount each, and how to prove it worked. Use whenever a company, OSPO, DevRel lead or engineering leader asks which open-source projects to sponsor, how much to budget for open-source funding, whether sponsoring maintainers is worth it, how to run an employee-nominated FOSS fund, how to fund dependencies at scale, how to pick a sponsorship tier on a maintainer's ladder, or how to measure the return on money paid to maintainers - even if they only say they want to give back. Not the maintainer side of raising sponsorship - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-sponsors-fundraising. Not event sponsorship.
Builds the tracking plan that instruments developer-relations surfaces - docs, blog, repositories, package registries, community venues, and off-web appearances - with an event taxonomy, an identity spine, link-tagging discipline, source-confidence labelling, and funnel views. Use when the user says "devrel tracking plan", "docs analytics", "utm discipline", "event taxonomy for our docs", "our GitHub numbers don't match analytics", "how do we instrument the developer funnel", "join docs traffic to signups", or wants to know why devrel numbers disagree between tools. Instrumentation layer only - which KPIs deserve a target belongs to samber/developer-relations-skills@devrel-metrics.
Designs a maintainer-side open-source sponsorship program - the tier ladder and its pricing for individual and corporate sponsors, rewards that stay deliverable at ten times the sponsor count, funding-goal and sustainability framing, and the invoice-and-entity path a company needs before it can pay. Use whenever a maintainer asks how to get sponsors or funding for a project, sets up or fixes GitHub Sponsors, Open Collective or FUNDING.yml, writes sponsor tiers, rewards or a sponsorship page, wonders why nobody sponsors a widely used project, considers sponsorware, or wants a company to fund maintenance work - even if they only say the project is unsustainable. Not the company side - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-sponsors-brand-strategy.
Splits a developer relations budget across pillars - events, content, community, tooling, education, OSS sponsorship - into line items that each carry a cash cost, an hours cost, a pre-set return threshold, a review date and a reallocation rule, plus a ranked cut list. Use whenever someone asks how to plan or split a devrel budget, how much to spend on events versus content versus community, whether a line item is worth its money, how to defend a devrel budget at review, or what to cut first when the budget shrinks - even if they only say "we spend too much on conferences". Not the metrics framework (samber/developer-relations-skills@devrel-metrics) or one event's ROI (samber/developer-relations-skills@developer-event-sponsorship).
Builds a prioritized keyword list for technical search queries (error strings, "how to X in Y" tasks, integration intents, comparisons, migrations) mined from docs search logs, support tickets, issue trackers and first-party query data rather than keyword-tool volume. Use whenever the user asks what developers actually search for, wants keywords for a developer tool, API, SDK or docs site, an error-message keyword list, demand sizing for a technical topic, or which docs pages to create from search demand - even if they never say "keyword". Does not write the pages. Do NOT use for on-page or docs-site SEO - use samber/developer-relations-skills@docs-seo.
Decides what a company open-sources and what stays proprietary, names the strategic motive for each side of the line, says who owns the decision, and states what the company commits never to close. Use whenever someone asks "should we open source this?", "what should we open source", "where do we draw the open-core line", "which features stay paid", "who signs off on open sourcing this", or wants a company-level open source strategy rather than a plan for one project - even if they frame it as a licensing question. Produces an asset-by-asset open/closed verdict, a value-capture and irreversibility check, a public non-reversal commitment and a re-evaluation trigger. Not license selection - use samber/developer-relations-skills@oss-license-strategy.
Cuts a developer audience into a few named, sized and ranked segments - the two dimensions worth cutting on, a size range with a confidence tier, the user/champion/approver/buyer split inside each, a weighted score, one primary and one secondary segment, and a written anti-segment. Use whenever someone asks who their developers actually are, which developer audience to serve first, how big a language ecosystem or persona is, whether to target hobbyists or enterprise platform teams, who signs when the developer is not the buyer, or why content reaches everyone and converts nobody - even if they only say "who is this for". Not the journey map - use samber/developer-relations-skills@developer-journey-map.
Designs the go-to-market motion for a developer-facing product - bottom-up self-serve adoption, developer-influenced sales, top-down with developer proof, or ecosystem-mediated distribution - plus the self-serve entry, the developer-to-buyer handoff rule and the land-and-expand path. Use whenever a founder, devrel or growth owner asks how developer adoption turns into revenue, whether to go bottom-up or hire sales, when to contact a free user, why signups are high and paid accounts flat, or how landed teams expand across an enterprise - even if they only say "our funnel is broken". Not price points - use samber/developer-relations-skills@devtools-pricing-strategy.
Turns raw commits, pull requests and tickets into release notes developers actually read - a scannable record of what shipped, what it means in practice, and what breaks. Use whenever the user mentions a changelog, CHANGELOG.md, release notes, a GitHub release body for a tag, a hosted "what's new" page, app-store release notes, Keep a Changelog, or Common Changelog, or asks what to write for a release they just cut - even when the commit history is messy and follows no commit convention. Not for version bumping, tagging or publishing pipelines. Do NOT use for a full breaking-change upgrade guide - use samber/developer-relations-skills@version-migration-guide; for a narrative release post use samber/developer-relations-skills@engineering-blog-post.
Engineers a technical demo so it survives the stage - risk triage, the fidelity tier it should run at, independently enterable checkpoints, a one-command environment reset, offline mode, a recorded fallback and rehearsed recovery lines, shipped as a demo runbook with a pre-flight checklist. Use whenever the user mentions a live demo, live coding, demo reliability or a fallback plan, "my demo broke on stage", whether to demo live or pre-record, a demo environment reset, a clean demo laptop, a demo profile or a panic button, or is preparing a talk, workshop, webinar or launch stream containing a demo - even if they only say "I'm nervous about the demo" or "what if I share the wrong screen". Not the talk's structure - use samber/developer-relations-skills@tech-talk-outline.