Loading...
Loading...
Found 60 Skills
Conducts comprehensive frontend design reviews covering UI/UX design quality, design system validation, accessibility compliance, responsive design patterns, component library architecture, and visual design consistency. Evaluates design specifications, Figma/Sketch files, design tokens, interaction patterns, and user experience flows. Identifies usability issues, accessibility violations, design system deviations, and provides actionable recommendations for improvement. Produces detailed design review reports with severity-rated findings, visual examples, and implementation guidelines. Use when reviewing frontend designs, validating design systems, ensuring accessibility compliance, evaluating component libraries, assessing responsive designs, or when users mention design review, UI/UX review, Figma review, design system validation, accessibility audit, or frontend design quality.
This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues. Triggers on requests like "review website design", "check the UI", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Detects issues with responsive design, accessibility, visual consistency, and layout breakage, then performs fixes at the source code level.
Semi-automated design quality review for Flows apps. Runs concrete repo probes (grep, lint, build) to propose a draft 1–5 score for each of the official 10 quality-guidelines questions from docs.cognite.com/cdf/flows/guides/quality-guidelines, then asks the user to confirm or override each score. Still requires the user to walk their tasks end-to-end in the running app (Step 2) since navigation and clickability feel cannot be measured statically. Writes reviews/design-review/feedback-round-<N>/design-review-report.md with an overall average and prioritized fix lists. Use when the user asks to run a Flows design review, run the design quality assessment, or run flows-design-review. Must be run AFTER flows-code-review reaches 0 Must Fix and BEFORE flows-external-app-submit.
AI-powered design review for Figma components with weighted dual-scoring system. Evaluates Style Guide Implementation (70%) and LLM Metadata Accessibility (30%). For export, hands off to atomic-design skill.
Run a structured design critique against the brief and codebase. Checks visual hierarchy, consistency, responsiveness, accessibility, and aesthetic fidelity. Use when user wants a design review, critique, QA pass, polish pass, or mentions "review" after building.
Help users run effective design reviews and critiques. Use when someone is giving design feedback, establishing design review processes, struggling to evaluate designs, or wants to improve how their team discusses design work.
Run high-signal design reviews (design critique / design crit / design feedback) by producing a Design Review Pack: review brief + requested feedback, agenda + facilitation script, feedback log prioritized by Value→Ease→Delight, decision record, and follow-up plan.
Comprehensive visual design and aesthetics evaluation. Analyzes typography, color, spacing, hierarchy, consistency, branding, and modern design trends for polished, professional interfaces.
Establish design review gates with criteria, checklists, and approval workflows.
Conducts comprehensive backend design reviews covering API design quality, database architecture validation, microservices patterns assessment, integration strategies evaluation, security design review, and scalability analysis. Evaluates API specifications (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), database schemas, service boundaries, authentication/authorization flows, caching strategies, message queues, and deployment architectures. Identifies design flaws, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and scalability issues. Produces detailed design review reports with severity-rated findings, architecture diagrams, and implementation recommendations. Use when reviewing backend system designs, validating API specifications, assessing database schemas, evaluating microservices architectures, reviewing integration patterns, or when users mention backend design review, API design validation, database design review, microservices assessment, or backend architecture evaluation.
Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. Rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what would make it a 10, then fixes the plan to get there. Works in plan mode. For live site visual audits, use /design-review. Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "design critique". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan with UI/UX components that should be reviewed before implementation.
Senior Designer review: rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what a 10 looks like, and flags AI Slop signals. Useful as a gate before merging UI work.