Loading...
Loading...
Found 4 Skills
Press a decision you just made until you can explain it to a skeptic in your own words, or surface the gap where you can't. The Feynman test aimed at a choice: understanding is cheapest to fake the moment after you decide, so a fresh critic presses for what you can't actually explain. Use right after picking an option, especially one an agent laid out without arguing for.
Apply a latticework of mental models from multiple disciplines to improve decision quality. Use this skill when the user needs to think more clearly, avoid cognitive blind spots, apply cross-disciplinary reasoning, or evaluate a complex decision from multiple angles — even if they say 'how should I think about this', 'what am I missing', 'give me a different perspective', or 'what frameworks apply here'.
Annie Duke's Decision Quality framework applied to a business decision. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Resulting Auditor, Calibrator, Pre-Mortem Analyst, Quit Strategist, Process Architect — who each apply a distinct lens from Duke's framework to evaluate whether a decision is sound regardless of outcome. The lead synthesizes into a stacking analysis: which biases are operating, which process flaws exist, and the honest Duke verdict. Use when the user says "duke this", "is this a good bet", "should I quit", "evaluate this decision", or faces any high-stakes choice under uncertainty and wants rigorous decision-process analysis. Works as a standalone analysis or after /office-hours.
Use when designing or auditing deadlines, limited seats, inventory messages, waitlists, expiring discounts, launch windows, limited editions, loss-framed copy, competition cues, checkout urgency, or scarcity claims that may create pressure to act quickly.