Loading...
Loading...
Found 15 Skills
Provide frameworks for managing and paying off personal debt effectively. Use when the user asks about debt payoff strategies (avalanche vs snowball), refinancing decisions, debt consolidation, debt-to-income ratios, or the opportunity cost of paying off debt vs investing. Also trigger when users mention 'which debt to pay first', 'should I refinance', 'credit card debt', 'student loan payoff', 'DTI for mortgage', 'balance transfer', 'good debt vs bad debt', or ask how to get out of debt faster.
Help users build and scale internal platforms and technical infrastructure. Use when someone is deciding whether to build vs buy tooling, designing developer platforms, creating shared services, or managing technical debt at scale.
Help users manage technical debt strategically. Use when someone is dealing with legacy code, planning refactoring work, deciding between rewrites vs. incremental fixes, trying to get buy-in for tech debt reduction, or balancing new features with maintenance.
Keeping codebases healthy, performant, and maintainable - refactoring, performance optimization, and technical debt managementUse when "refactor, optimize, performance, technical debt, cleanup, architecture, speed up, bundle size, memory leak, slow query, code smell, complexity, dead code, performance, refactoring, optimization, technical-debt, architecture, cleanup, bundle, memory" mentioned.
Manage technical debt by producing a Tech Debt Management Pack (debt register, scoring/prioritization, refactor vs rewrite decision memo, incremental paydown plan, migration/rollback plan, metrics, and stakeholder cadence). Use for tech debt, refactoring, legacy modernization, and migrations.
Decision-making framework for software development, Y Combinator / Silicon Valley style. Based on real principles from Paul Graham, Sam Altman, Michael Seibel, Patrick Collison, and Brian Chesky. Use when: - Developing features or products - Making technical decisions (what to do, how, when) - Prioritizing work (P0, P1, P2) - Evaluating whether to refactor or patch - Deciding on technical debt - Evaluating whether to add tests, CI/CD, or automation - Any architecture or engineering decision Triggers: development, code, feature, refactor, architecture, prioritize, technical decision, what to do first, technical debt, tests, CI/CD, sprint, backlog
Refactor codebases using Design by Typed Holes methodology - iterative, test-driven refactoring with formal hole resolution, constraint propagation, and continuous validation. Use when refactoring existing code, optimizing architecture, or consolidating technical debt through systematic hole-driven development.
Systematically evaluate architecture decisions, document trade-offs, and select appropriate patterns. This skill should be used when the user asks about 'architecture decision', 'ADR', 'design pattern selection', 'technology choice', or needs to evaluate architectural trade-offs. Keywords: architecture, ADR, patterns, trade-offs, technical debt, quality attributes, decision record.
Code quality specialist: architecture patterns, refactoring, code review, development practices. 23 methodologies.
Identify, categorize, and prioritize technical debt. Trigger with "tech debt", "technical debt audit", "what should we refactor", "code health", or when the user asks about code quality, refactoring priorities, or maintenance backlog.
Scans codebases for technical debt with AST parsing, prioritizes debt items by impact, and generates trend dashboards. Use when tracking tech debt, prioritizing refactoring, or measuring code quality trends over time.
Expert financial guidance for budgeting, investments, and retirement planning. Use for analyzing market strategies, debt management, or general personal finance questions.