Loading...
Loading...
Found 14 Skills
Identify and analyze cognitive biases including confirmation bias, anchoring, availability heuristic, and sunk cost fallacy in decision-making contexts. Use this skill when the user needs to audit a decision for bias, understand why a team keeps making the same mistakes, design debiasing interventions, or evaluate whether a conclusion is based on evidence or cognitive shortcuts — even if they say 'are we fooling ourselves', 'why do we keep getting this wrong', or 'is this analysis biased'.
Apply Kahneman and Thaler's behavioral economics principles to marketing—understand how customers actually make decisions and design experiences that work with human psychology, not against it. Use when: **Improve conversion rates** by removing friction and applying behavioral nudges; **Design pricing pages** that guide customers toward optimal choices; **Write copy that resonates** with how people actually process information; **Create urgency and scarcity** that feels authentic, not manipul...
Apply cognitive bias knowledge to product design and decision-making. Use when designing user experiences, analyzing user behavior, improving conversions, or ensuring ethical design practices.
Apply cognitive bias detection whenever the user (or Claude itself) is making an evaluation, recommendation, or decision that could be silently distorted by systematic thinking errors. Triggers on phrases like "I'm pretty sure", "obviously", "everyone agrees", "we already invested so much", "this has always worked", "just one more try", "I knew it", "the data confirms what we thought", "we can't go back now", or when analysis feels suspiciously aligned with what someone wanted to hear. Also trigger proactively when evaluating high-stakes decisions, plans with significant sunk costs, or conclusions that conveniently support the evaluator's existing position. The goal is not to paralyze — it's to flag where reasoning may be compromised so it can be corrected.
Use when making decisions under time pressure or uncertainty, preventing errors in complex procedures, designing decision rules or checklists, simplifying complex choices, or when user mentions heuristics, rules of thumb, mental models, checklists, error prevention, cognitive biases, satisficing, or needs practical decision shortcuts and systematic error reduction.
Use to detect and remove cognitive biases from reasoning. Invoke when prediction feels emotional, stuck at 50/50, or when you want to validate forecasting process. Use when user mentions scout mindset, soldier mindset, bias check, reversal test, scope sensitivity, or cognitive distortions.
Apply dual-process theory to diagnose whether judgments arise from fast intuitive (System 1) or slow analytical (System 2) processing and identify resulting cognitive biases. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why quick decisions go wrong, design choice architectures that account for cognitive defaults, audit decision processes for heuristic errors, or when they ask 'why do people misjudge probability', 'how to reduce snap-judgment errors', or 'when does intuition fail'.
Audits decisions for cognitive biases, runs premortems on plans, and reframes choices to reveal hidden assumptions. Use when evaluating decisions under uncertainty, reviewing plans for bias, assessing probability and risk, running premortems, checking for anchoring or availability bias, or analyzing why a judgment might be wrong.
Apply 25 professional mental models to solve complex problems. Use when: (1) facing multi-faceted challenges that require diverse perspectives, (2) stuck in single-minded approaches, (3) need innovative solutions, (4) making major decisions with multiple stakeholders, (5) understanding complex human behavior, or (6) seeking to break cognitive biases and adopt alternative viewpoints.
Use when asked to "thinking in bets", "make decisions under uncertainty", "think probabilistically", "avoid resulting", "separate decision quality from outcomes", or "reduce bias in decisions". Helps make explicit bets and evaluate decisions on process, not results. The Thinking in Bets framework (from Annie Duke) applies poker strategy to business and life decisions.
Activate this when users need to understand extreme events (bubbles, crashes, mass hysteria, cults, mob behavior), diagnose systemic organizational failures, or assess the risk of multiple psychological/market/institutional forces aligning in the same direction. Typical trigger signals: the phenomenon described by the user "far exceeds what any single factor can explain"; the user attempts to explain an extreme outcome with a single cause; the user is concerned about "multiple adverse factors erupting simultaneously". Not applicable to conventional single-factor decision analysis or assessment of mild incremental changes.
Understand and apply psychological concepts to create superior user experiences (UX) in frontend design.