Loading...
Loading...
Found 10 Skills
Expert quality gate decisions for iOS/tvOS: which gates matter for your project size, threshold calibration that catches bugs without blocking velocity, SwiftLint rule selection, and CI integration patterns. Use when setting up linting, configuring CI pipelines, or calibrating coverage thresholds. Trigger keywords: SwiftLint, SwiftFormat, coverage, CI, quality gate, lint, static analysis, pre-commit, threshold, warning
Git commit with enforced quality gates, proper message format, and safe push workflow
Provides SonarQube and SonarCloud integration patterns via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. Enables quality gate monitoring, issue discovery and triaging, pre-push code analysis, and rule education directly in the agent workflow. Use when the user wants to check quality gates, search for Sonar issues, analyze code snippets before committing, or understand SonarQube rules. Triggers on "sonarqube", "sonarcloud", "quality gate", "sonar issues", "analyze with sonar", "check sonar", "sonar rule", "pre-push analysis".
Use when executing multi-task plans where each task can be implemented independently by a subagent. Triggers when a plan has 3+ independent tasks, when speed of execution is important, when tasks have clear acceptance criteria suitable for delegation, or when two-stage review gates (spec compliance and code quality) are needed for iterative fix cycles.
Code quality and deviation gate between /implement and /test. Reads the task document and changed files, validates coding standards, classifies deviations (minor/medium/major), and decides whether implementation is ready for testing. Runs automatically in the auto-chain between implement and test. Also invoke manually after any implementation to catch issues before wasting a test run.
Multi-language code quality gate with auto-detection and language-specific linters. Use when user asks to "run quality checks", "quality gate", "lint all", "check everything", "pre-commit checks", or "is this code ready to commit". Use for verifying code quality across polyglot repos. Do NOT use for single-language linting (use code-linting) or comprehensive code review (use systematic-code-review).
Run parallel quality reviews (React, SOLID, Security, Simplification, Slop) on branch changes and auto-fix issues
Run a strict clean-code review with a numeric score and pass/fail gate. Use when a user asks for a code review, wants Uncle Bob-style feedback, or wants unnecessary abstractions removed with SOLID/KISS discipline.
Safely track pull request feedback, resolve review comments or merge conflicts, validate fixes, and use a read-only cross-review before committing or pushing follow-up changes.
Enforce disciplined agent development workflows with plan-first development, small-slice execution, specialized self-review roles, quality gates, and project setup. Use when starting a new project, setting up development conventions, wanting structured planning, or needing the agent to follow best practices for code quality, review, and validation.