Loading...
Loading...
Found 6 Skills
Quality review skill for verifying complex changes against criteria. Use for multi-file changes, new features, or before important commits. Skip for trivial fixes and quick iterations.
Local code review tool for self-inspection before git push. Triggered when users request phrases like "review my code", "check code changes", "review this commit", "review this", "code review", "git review", "help me check my code". Supports reviewing unstaged, staged uncommitted, and committed unpushed changes, and outputs a Markdown review report with scores.
Systematically explore and evaluate a library, tool, or GitHub repo in an isolated scratch environment. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "try", "evaluate", "explore", or "kick the tires" on a library/repo/tool, especially when they provide a GitHub URL, npm/pip package name, or repo shorthand like "owner/repo". Use it when they want real primitives, failure modes, and composability beyond quickstarts before deciding on integration. Produces runnable scratch/ scripts demonstrating key primitives, a composition script, and a Tutorial.md with honest findings. This is NOT for full integration into an existing codebase.
Review-only GitHub pull request analysis with the gh CLI. Use when asked to review a PR, provide structured feedback, or assess readiness to land. Do not merge, push, or make code changes you intend to keep.
Assesses and rates quality 0-10 with pros/cons analysis. Use when evaluating code, designs, or approaches.
Evaluates student code submissions based on conceptual mastery rather than just correctness. Use to provide high-quality educational feedback on architectural patterns and programming logic.