Loading...
Loading...
Found 39 Skills
Write a structured architecture decision document — an RFC / design doc / technical doc that records *why* a non-trivial technical choice was made, not just what was built. Follows a six-part method: contextualize for a newcomer, state the architecturally-relevant requirements, design components against them with static + dynamic diagrams, weigh every alternative by pros / cons / risks (each risk with impact, probability, mitigation, contingency), record the decision and how it was made, then conclude and communicate. Writes in the language of the request. Reach for it whenever someone is choosing between technical options or documenting one — "write an RFC", "design doc", "architecture decision", "ADR", "tradeoff analysis", "technical documentation of an implementation", "help me decide between X and Y" — even if they never say "RFC". Also fits the retrospective variant: documenting an implementation after the fact (lessons learned, version history).
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.
Expert in designing high-level enterprise solutions. Specializes in TOGAF adaptation, trade-off analysis, and aligning technology with business strategy.
Use this skill when documenting significant architectural decisions. Provides ADR templates following the Nygard format with sections for context, decision, consequences, and alternatives. Use when writing ADRs, recording decisions, or evaluating options.
Use when starting a Beat change to create spec artifacts — not for task breakdown, implementation, or exploration
Helps engineering managers break down knowledge silos and build sustainable documentation and collaboration practices — produces a four-root-cause diagnostic for silos, an Engineering Guilds framework, a minimum-viable documentation approach using ADRs, a structured onboarding model, and a cross-team request decision framework. Use when the user says "knowledge silos," "reinventing the wheel," "nobody reads docs," "onboarding is bad," "teams don't talk," "documentation culture," "cross-team friction," "information doesn't flow," or "new hires struggle to ramp up."
Use when designing new system architecture, reviewing existing designs, or making architectural decisions. Invoke for system design, architecture review, design patterns, ADRs, scalability planning.
Design software architectures with appropriate patterns for scale, maintainability, and team structure. Covers layered, hexagonal, event-driven, CQRS, and modular monolith architectures. Produces architecture decision records, component diagrams, and dependency maps. Prevents over-engineering, premature distribution, and architectural drift.
System architecture and technical design specialist. 🚨 TIER 2 SKILL - ON-DEMAND ACTIVATION 🚨 Use when user requests involve: - System architecture design and planning - Technical specifications and ADRs - Technology evaluation and selection - Scalability and performance planning - Integration architecture and API design - English: "design system", "architecture", "ADR", "tech stack", "scalability" - Swedish: "arkitektur", "systemdesign", "teknikval", "skalbarhet" Architecture Specialist (British female voice) provides: - System design and architecture patterns - Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) - Technology evaluation and trade-off analysis - Cloud and microservices architecture - Integration patterns and API design User confirmation optional but recommended for major architectural decisions.
Use when designing system architecture, choosing between monolith/microservices/serverless, planning scalability, or making technology decisions. Covers microservices, event-driven, CQRS, modular monoliths, distributed systems, and reliability patterns for production-grade software.
System architecture guidance for Python/React full-stack projects. Use during the design phase when making architectural decisions — component boundaries, service layer design, data flow patterns, database schema planning, and technology trade-off analysis. Covers FastAPI layer architecture (Routes/Services/Repositories/Models), React component hierarchy, state management, and cross-cutting concerns (auth, errors, logging). Produces architecture documents and ADRs. Does NOT cover implementation (use python-backend-expert or react-frontend-expert) or API contract design (use api-design-patterns).
Design, evaluate, and document software architecture patterns