Loading...
Loading...
Found 7 Skills
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.
Create and validate solution design documents (SDD). Use when designing architecture, defining interfaces, documenting technical decisions, analyzing system components, or working on solution-design.md files in docs/specs/. Includes validation checklist, consistency verification, and overlap detection.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze dependencies", "choose a database", "plan for scalability", "make technical decisions", or "review system design". Use for architecture decision records (ADRs), tech stack evaluation, system design reviews, dependency analysis, and generating architecture diagrams in Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII format.
Creates an Architecture Decision Record following the Nygard format to document significant technical decisions, their context, and consequences. Use when making technical choices that affect system architecture, technology selection, or development patterns.
Harness Engineering Phase 1 Step 2: Conduct in-depth analysis of project code and fill in the substantive content of each file in the docs/ knowledge base. Use this skill after the directory skeleton is created by harness-step1-create-agents-md. Immediately trigger this skill when the user says "fill document content", "improve docs/ files", "add substantive content to documents", "analyze project and write architecture document", "write ARCHITECTURE.md", or "write technical decision document". Prerequisite: The project already has AGENTS.md and the docs/ directory skeleton (created by harness-step1).
Retrieves implementation knowledge, code examples, and documentation references. Use to inform technical decision-making when the user requires specific library usage, framework patterns, or syntax details. Trigger on requests to 'search docs', 'find code examples', or 'check implementation details'.
Run structured multi-role design reviews and architecture debates for technical decisions. Use when Codex needs to compare options, pressure-test tradeoffs, recommend an MVP path, or simulate a meeting with distinct evaluation roles such as moderator, skeptic, pragmatist, minimalist, maximalist, retrieval architect, Granary workflow lead, semantic purist, lightweight contrarian, context economist, or workflow conservative.