Loading...
Loading...
Found 14 Skills
Use when the user asks for a broad codebase review, substantial PR/branch review, architecture audit, tech-debt scan, cleanup assessment, structural sanity check, or design-alignment review. Default workflow: use sub-agents when available unless specifically forbidden; do not require the user to mention sub-agents, council mode, delegation, or parallel review. Focus on cruft, duplication, weak boundaries, missed reuse, lifecycle/concurrency risks, test/roadmap drift, and code aesthetics. Do not use for narrow bug fixes, ordinary small-diff reviews, frontend visual QA, repo-onboarding docs, or OpenAI Agents SDK production-readiness review. Output evidence-backed findings first, then pressure points, design alignment, open questions, and follow-through.
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Includes tech debt analyzer, team scaling calculator, engineering metrics frameworks, technology evaluation tools, and ADR templates. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.
Use when making architecture decisions, evaluating build-vs-buy, planning tech stack, prioritizing tech debt, writing PRDs, or needing strategic technical leadership
Identify and clean up stale feature flags in a PostHog project. Use when the user wants to find unused, fully rolled out, or abandoned feature flags, review them for safety, and then disable or delete them. Covers staleness detection, dependency checking, and safe removal workflows.
Help users create technical roadmaps. Use when someone is planning engineering work, prioritizing tech debt, building architecture roadmaps, or aligning technical and product strategy.
Architecture and design review for specified files/dirs/repo. Covers tech debt, patterns, quality. Diff-only review use review-diff. Complements review-code (orchestrated).
Registro, priorización y planificación de deuda técnica: taxonomía, puntuación, informe, integración con sprint.
Code quality specialist: architecture patterns, refactoring, code review, development practices. 23 methodologies.
Performs comprehensive codebase audit checking architecture, tech debt, security vulnerabilities, test coverage, documentation, dependencies, and maintainability. Use when auditing a project, assessing codebase health, running security scans, checking for vulnerabilities, reviewing code quality, analyzing tech debt, or asked to audit/analyze the entire codebase.
/cs:cto-review <plan> — Architecture and scaling interrogation. Tech debt, scaling cliffs, team scaling, build-vs-buy.
Verify milestone achievement against its definition of done, checking requirements coverage, cross-phase integration, and end-to-end flows. Triggers include "audit milestone", "verify milestone", "check milestone", and "milestone audit". This skill reads existing phase verification files, aggregates technical debt and gaps, and spawns an integration checker for cross-phase wiring.
Guides "ship or iterate?" decisions using Shreyas Doshi's frameworks, Marty Cagan's shipping philosophy, and Tobi Lutke's reversible decision-making. Use when deciding if feature is ready, preventing perfectionism paralysis, applying one-way vs two-way door thinking, or balancing technical debt vs shipping speed.